Computer Navigation Did Not Improve Alignment in a Lower-volume Total Knee Practice

AbstractPostoperative alignment of the implanted prosthesis in computer-navigated TKA has been reported to be superior to that using the conventional technique. There is an assumption that use of computer navigation techniques can make an inexperienced or occasional TKA surgeon perform more like an expert TKA surgeon. To assess improved accuracy in recreation of mechanical alignment in TKA performed using computer navigation, a retrospective review of the experience of one of the authors (WPY) before and after using computer navigation was performed. We reviewed the radiographic results of 104 TKAs (52 computer navigation, 52 conventional technique) and found the accuracy of postoperative radiographic alignment of the implanted prosthesis was not improved by using computer navigation as judged by (1) overall limb alignment (case: varus 1.3°; control: varus 0.3°); (2) femoral component alignment (case: 90.3°; control: 90.3°); and (3) tibial component alignment (case: 89°; control: 90°). Significant factors that affected postoperative overall mechanical alignment in the current navigation series included severity of the preoperative deformity, amount of error in making bone cuts, and experience of the surgeon in using the computer navigation system. Level of Evidence: Level III, therapeutic study. See the Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

[1]  W. Breidahl,et al.  Computer-assisted knee arthroplasty versus a conventional jig-based technique. A randomised, prospective trial. , 2004, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[2]  Wojciech Widuchowski,et al.  [Total knee arthroplasty]. , 2004, Wiadomosci lekarskie.

[3]  S. Harwin,et al.  Influence of intramedullary versus extramedullary alignment guides on final total knee arthroplasty component position: a radiographic analysis. , 1998, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[4]  Y.H. Kim,et al.  Alignment and orientation of the components in total knee replacement with and without navigation support: a prospective, randomised study. , 2007, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[5]  J. Insall,et al.  The correction of knee alignment in 225 consecutive total condylar knee replacements. , 1981, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[6]  Georg Matziolis,et al.  A prospective, randomized study of computer-assisted and conventional total knee arthroplasty. Three-dimensional evaluation of implant alignment and rotation. , 2007, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[7]  Pak Lin Chin,et al.  Randomized control trial comparing radiographic total knee arthroplasty implant placement using computer navigation versus conventional technique. , 2005, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[8]  John J Callaghan,et al.  Computer-assisted surgery: a wine before its time: in the affirmative. , 2006, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[9]  G. Engh,et al.  A comparative study of extramedullary and intramedullary alignment systems in total knee arthroplasty. , 1988, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[10]  Richard L Wixson,et al.  Computer assisted navigation in total knee arthroplasty: improved coronal alignment. , 2005, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[11]  M. Janeček,et al.  Total knee arthroplasty implanted with and without kinematic navigation , 2003, International Orthopaedics.

[12]  D. Zurakowski,et al.  Alignment in total knee arthroplasty. A comparison of computer-assisted surgery with the conventional technique. , 2004, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[13]  M. Bolognesi,et al.  Computer Navigation versus Standard Instrumentation for TKA: A Single-Surgeon Experience , 2005, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[14]  Michael Nogler,et al.  Navigation Improves Accuracy of Rotational Alignment in Total Knee Arthroplasty , 2004, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[15]  M. Porter,et al.  Preliminary radiological evaluation of the Vector Vision CT-free knee module for implantation of the LCS knee prosthesis. , 2007, The Knee.

[16]  Arno Martin,et al.  Two-year Outcomes of Computed Tomography-based and Computed Tomography Free Navigation for Total Knee Arthroplasties , 2006, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[17]  M. Ritter,et al.  Postoperative alignment of total knee replacement. Its effect on survival. , 1994, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[18]  Wolfhart Puhl,et al.  Leg axis after computer-navigated total knee arthroplasty: a prospective randomized trial comparing computer-navigated and manual implantation. , 2005, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[19]  M. Ritter,et al.  Intramedullary versus extramedullary femoral alignment systems in total knee replacement. , 1993, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[20]  Computer-assisted surgery: a wine before its time: in opposition. , 2006, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[21]  P. Sharkey,et al.  Insall Award paper. Why are total knee arthroplasties failing today? , 2002, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[22]  C. Colwell,et al.  Accuracy of Intramedullary Versus Extramedullary Tibial Alignment Cutting Systems in Total Knee Arthroplasty , 1995, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[23]  C. Colwell,et al.  The Efficacy of Intramedullary Femoral Alignment in Total Knee Replacement , 1995, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[24]  D. Dennis,et al.  Intramedullary versus extramedullary tibial alignment systems in total knee arthroplasty. , 1993, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[25]  M. Kurosaka,et al.  Prosthetic alignment and sizing in computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty , 2004, International Orthopaedics.

[26]  Markus Tingart,et al.  Revision total knee arthroplasty: a comparison of postoperative leg alignment after computer-assisted implantation versus the conventional technique , 2005, Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy.

[27]  D. S. Pandher,et al.  Computer-assisted navigation increases precision of component placement in total knee arthroplasty. , 2007, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[28]  D. Banzer,et al.  Positioning of total knee arthroplasty with and without navigation support. A prospective, randomised study. , 2003, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[29]  S. Odum,et al.  Early Failures in Total Knee Arthroplasty , 2001, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[30]  B. K. Vaughn,et al.  A comparison of intramedullary and extramedullary alignment systems for tibial component placement in total knee arthroplasty. , 1991, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[31]  D. D’Lima,et al.  Improving tibial component coronal alignment during total knee arthroplasty with use of a tibial planing device. , 2007, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[32]  G. Engh,et al.  Comparative experience with intramedullary and extramedullary alignment in total knee arthroplasty. , 1990, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[33]  Jan Victor,et al.  Image-Based Computer-Assisted Total Knee Arthroplasty Leads to Lower Variability in Coronal Alignment , 2004, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[34]  R. Gustilo,et al.  Extramedullary versus intramedullary alignment guides in total knee arthroplasty. , 1995, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[35]  P. Sharkey,et al.  Why Are Total Knee Arthroplasties Failing Today? , 2002 .