Variable buoyancy control for a bottom skimming autonomous underwater vehicle

Two feedback controllers are presented that utilize data averaging and model-based estimation to offset the effects of sensor noise and achieve precise control of an autonomous underwater vehicle (AUV) variable buoyancy system (VBS). Operation of the bottom skimming AUV requires a constant reaction force between the seabed and the vehicle. While performing a mission, variable seafloor topography and a changing payload weight requires the use of a VBS to maintain the reaction force. Two traits of the VBS system that make this a challenging problem are the presence of sensor noise and fast on/off actuation relative to the sensor update rate. It was discovered that both controllers function under these conditions but the model-based controller provides more precise control of the system. This paper presents a comparison between these two control algorithms based on both simulation results and field experiments in a coastal environment.

[1]  Edwin Olson,et al.  LCM: Lightweight Communications and Marshalling , 2010, 2010 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.

[2]  David W. Clarke,et al.  Generalized predictive control - Part I. The basic algorithm , 1987, Autom..

[3]  V. Manikandan,et al.  Estimation of voltage signal analysis using Extended Kalman Filter , 2014, 2014 International Conference on Communication and Signal Processing.

[4]  S. Joe Qin,et al.  A survey of industrial model predictive control technology , 2003 .

[5]  N. Tamaru,et al.  Noise reduction for gray image using a Kalman filter , 2003, SICE 2003 Annual Conference (IEEE Cat. No.03TH8734).

[6]  Harold Franklin Jensen Variable buoyancy system metric , 2009 .

[7]  Yasuo Ariki,et al.  Noisy speech recognition using noise reduction method based on Kalman filter , 2000, 2000 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing. Proceedings (Cat. No.00CH37100).

[8]  Brian Bingham,et al.  Robotic simulation of dynamic plume tracking by Unmanned Surface Vessels , 2015, 2015 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA).

[9]  P.A. DeBitetto Fuzzy logic for depth control of unmanned undersea vehicles , 1994, Proceedings of IEEE Symposium on Autonomous Underwater Vehicle Technology (AUV'94).

[10]  Mahdi Tavakoli,et al.  Sliding mode control of a pneumatic haptic teleoperation system with on/off solenoid valves , 2011, 2011 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[11]  J. Dzielski,et al.  A Variable Buoyancy Control System for a Large AUV , 2007, IEEE Journal of Oceanic Engineering.

[12]  Mandar Chitre,et al.  Depth control of an autonomous underwater vehicle, STARFISH , 2010, OCEANS'10 IEEE SYDNEY.

[13]  S. Cecchini,et al.  Proportional mechanical ventilation through PWM driven on/off solenoid valve , 2010, 2010 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology.

[14]  Seiichiro Katsura,et al.  Scaled bilateral control using Kalman Filter based state estimation for reduction of noise effect , 2013, 2013 IEEE International Symposium on Industrial Electronics.

[15]  Thiagalingam Kirubarajan,et al.  Estimation with Applications to Tracking and Navigation , 2001 .

[16]  Anthony J. Healey,et al.  Design and Development of Low Cost Variable Buoyancy System for the Soft Grounding of Autonomous Underwater Vehicles , 2005 .