Abstract The mere existence of competency standards for an occupation is not, in itself, enough to tell us whether they will be a help or a hindrance for education and training providers. Instead, that will depend on what sort of competency standards they are and how they are being used by the education and training providers. This paper will describe, firstly, the types of competency standards that would be a hindrance for vocational education and training providers and those that would be a help. Secondly, assuming that competency standards of the helpful type are available, the paper will outline the ways of using them that would still be detrimental to vocational education and training, and contrast this with ways of using them so as to improve the provision of vocational education and training. As against the widely held belief that competency standards require a totally new approach to vocational education and training, this paper argues that this is true only of the type of competency standards tha...
[1]
Lindsay Heywood,et al.
A guide to development of competency standards for professions
,
1992
.
[2]
Robert H. Ennis.
The Extent to Which Critical Thinking Is Subject-Specific: Further Clarification
,
1990
.
[3]
George O. Klemp.
The Meaning of Success
,
1988
.
[4]
Andrew Gonczi.
The development of competency-based assessment strategies for the professions
,
1993
.
[5]
Robert H. Ennis.
Critical Thinking and Subject Specificity: Clarification and Needed Research
,
1989
.
[6]
Andrew Gonczi,et al.
Establishing competency-based standards in the professions
,
1990
.
[7]
M. Chandler,et al.
The Cognitive Psychology of Knowledge: Basic Research Findings and Educational Implications
,
1991
.