The influence of learning style and training method on self-efficacy and learning performance in WWW homepage design training

The present study compares the relative effects of two training methods on learner's computer self-efficacy and learning performance in WWW homepage design. A field experiment was conducted by employing two classes of 10th graders. Results indicated that the behavior modeling training method yielded consistently superior performance and higher computer self-efficacy as compared with the instruction-based approach. Subjects with various learning styles performed substantially different in some learning tasks. The significant two-way interaction indicates the critical roles that gender and learning style played in interacting with training method. For learning performance, male students benefited more from the instruction-based and female students learned better in the behavior modeling condition. Concerning computer self-efficacy, female students gained more from the instruction and male students benefited more from behavior modeling approaches. For different learning style students, there exists a best-fit training approach. In addition, the best-fit training approach is task dependent. These results suggest that each individual training method has its unique merit to meet designated training objectives for learners with specific traits. Future research directions conclude the paper.

[1]  Robert P. Bostrom,et al.  Individual Differences and Conceptual Models in Training Novice Users , 1989, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[2]  Gordon W. Waugh,et al.  Assessing Computer Anxiety , 1989, Psychological reports.

[3]  Lorne Olfman,et al.  CONCEPTUAL MODELS IN TRAINING NOVICE USERS , 1987 .

[4]  Donna F. Davis,et al.  The Effect of Training Techniques and Personal Characteristics on Training End Users of Information Systems , 1990, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[5]  Jeanne Banfield Training end users , 1992 .

[6]  Richard T. Christoph,et al.  Overcoming barriers to training utilizing technology: The influence of self‐efficacy factors on multimedia‐based training receptiveness , 1998 .

[7]  R. Heinssen,et al.  Assessing computer anxiety: Development and validation of the Computer Anxiety Rating Scale , 1987 .

[8]  D. Campbell,et al.  EXPERIMENTAL AND QUASI-EXPERIMENT Al DESIGNS FOR RESEARCH , 2012 .

[9]  Robert P. Bostrom,et al.  Training End Users: An Experimental Investigation of the Roles of the Computer Interface and Training Methods , 1993, MIS Q..

[10]  A. Bandura Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory , 1985 .

[11]  James T. C. Teng,et al.  Facilitating the implementation of customer‐based inter‐organizational systems: an empirical analysis of innovation and support factors , 1994, Inf. Syst. J..

[12]  W ZmudRobert Individual Differences and MIS Success , 1979 .

[13]  R. Zmud INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES AND MIS SUCCESS: A REVIEW OF THE EMPIRICAL LITERATURE* , 1979 .

[14]  A. Bandura Principles of behavior modification , 1969 .

[15]  S. Owen,et al.  Development and Validation of the Computer Self-Efficacy Scale , 1989 .

[16]  Bernadette Szajna,et al.  Predictors of learning performance in a computer-user training environment: A path-analytic study , 1995, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact..

[17]  Huey-Wen Chou,et al.  Effects of Learning Style and Training Method on Computer Attitude and Performance in World Wide Web Page Design Training , 1999 .

[18]  Marilyn E. Gist,et al.  EFFECTS OF ALTERNATIVE TRAINING METHODS ON SELF-EFFICACY AND PERFORMANCE IN COMPUTER SOFTWARE TRAINING , 1989 .

[19]  Joseph J. Martocchio,et al.  Turning Work into Play: Implications for Microcomputer Software Training , 1993 .

[20]  Joseph D. Novak,et al.  The identification and significance of intuitive and analytic problem solving approaches among college physics students , 1974 .

[21]  F. Marton,et al.  ON QUALITATIVE DIFFERENCES IN LEARNING: I—OUTCOME AND PROCESS* , 1976 .

[22]  Jane Webster,et al.  Computer Training and Computer Anxiety in the Educational Process: an Experimental Analysis , 1990, ICIS.

[23]  G. Pask STYLES AND STRATEGIES OF LEARNING , 1976 .

[24]  D. F. Butcher,et al.  Predicting performance in an introductory computer science course , 1985, CACM.

[25]  Steven John Simon The relationship of information system training methods and cognitive ability to end user satisfaction, comprehension and skill transfer: a field experiment , 1994 .

[26]  Thomas Hill,et al.  Role of efficacy expectations in predicting the decision to use advanced technologies: The case of computers. , 1987 .

[27]  Marilyn E. Gist,et al.  THE INFLUENCE OF TRAINING METHOD AND TRAINEE AGE ON THE ACQUISITION OF COMPUTER SKILLS , 1988 .

[28]  George P. McCabe,et al.  Predicting the success of freshmen in a computer science major , 1984, CACM.

[29]  Magid Igbaria,et al.  Microcomputer applications: An empirical look at usage , 1989, Inf. Manag..

[30]  G. Hackett,et al.  The effects of mathematics task performance on math self-efficacy and task interest☆ , 1986 .

[31]  Deborah Compeau,et al.  Application of Social Cognitive Theory to Training for Computer Skills , 1995, Inf. Syst. Res..

[32]  John McGann Microcomputer applications , 1983, ACM '83.

[33]  Roger Säljö,et al.  Learning approach and outcome: Some empirical observations , 1981 .

[34]  C. A. Moore,et al.  Field-Dependent and Field-Independent Cognitive Styles and Their Educational Implications , 1977 .

[35]  R. Kelly Rainer,et al.  The Influence of Individual Differences on Skill in End-User Computing , 1992, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[36]  Jon M. Werner,et al.  Computer training through behavior modeling, self-paced, and instructional approaches : A field experiment , 1996 .

[37]  M. Posner,et al.  Information processing models--in search of elementary operations. , 1982, Annual review of psychology.

[38]  David Bawden,et al.  Review: The web page design cookbook , 1996 .

[39]  Marilyn E. Gist,et al.  THE INFLUENCE OF TRAINING METHOD ON SELF‐EFFICACY AND IDEA GENERATION AMONG MANAGERS , 1989 .

[40]  C. Cooper Theories of Group Processes , 1976 .

[41]  Lorne Olfman,et al.  The Importance of Learning Style in End-User Training , 1990, MIS Q..

[42]  James T. C. Teng,et al.  The Relationship of Information System Training Methods and Cognitive Ability to End-User Satisfaction, Comprehension, and Skill Transfer: A Longitudinal Field Study , 1996, Inf. Syst. Res..