Optimization of the In-silico-designed Kemp Eliminase Ke70 by Computational Design and Directed Evolution Journal of Molecular Biology

Although de novo computational enzyme design has been shown to be feasible, the field is still in its infancy: the kinetic parameters of designed enzymes are still orders of magnitude lower than those of naturally occurring ones. Nonetheless, designed enzymes can be improved by directed evolution, as recently exemplified for the designed Kemp eliminase KE07. Random mutagenesis and screening resulted in variants with >200-fold higher catalytic efficiency and provided insights about features missing in the designed enzyme. Here we describe the optimization of KE70, another designed Kemp eliminase. Amino acid substitutions predicted to improve catalysis in design calculations involving extensive backbone sampling were individually tested. Those proven beneficial were combinatorially incorporated into the originally designed KE70 along with random mutations, and the resulting libraries were screened for improved eliminase activity. Nine rounds of mutation and selection resulted in >400-fold improvement in the catalytic efficiency of the original KE70 design, reflected in both higher k(cat) values and lower K(m) values, with the best variants exhibiting k(cat)/K(m) values of >5×10(4) s(-)(1) M(-1). The optimized KE70 variants were characterized structurally and biochemically, providing insights into the origins of the improvements in catalysis. Three primary contributions were identified: first, the reshaping of the active-site cavity to achieve tighter substrate binding; second, the fine-tuning of electrostatics around the catalytic His-Asp dyad; and, third, the stabilization of the active-site dyad in a conformation optimal for catalysis.

[1]  T. Darden,et al.  Particle mesh Ewald: An N⋅log(N) method for Ewald sums in large systems , 1993 .

[2]  David Baker,et al.  An exciting but challenging road ahead for computational enzyme design , 2010, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[3]  Marco A Mena,et al.  Blue fluorescent proteins with enhanced brightness and photostability from a structurally targeted library , 2006, Nature Biotechnology.

[4]  Randy J Read,et al.  Electronic Reprint Biological Crystallography Likelihood-enhanced Fast Rotation Functions Biological Crystallography Likelihood-enhanced Fast Rotation Functions , 2003 .

[5]  P. Babbitt,et al.  Evolution of enzyme superfamilies. , 2006, Current opinion in chemical biology.

[6]  G. Scuseria,et al.  Gaussian 03, Revision E.01. , 2007 .

[7]  David Baker,et al.  Protein Structure Prediction Using Rosetta , 2004, Numerical Computer Methods, Part D.

[8]  G. Murshudov,et al.  Refinement of macromolecular structures by the maximum-likelihood method. , 1997, Acta crystallographica. Section D, Biological crystallography.

[9]  David Baker,et al.  Macromolecular modeling with rosetta. , 2008, Annual review of biochemistry.

[10]  W. Jencks,et al.  Binding energy, specificity, and enzymic catalysis: the circe effect. , 2006, Advances in enzymology and related areas of molecular biology.

[11]  D. Hilvert,et al.  Large rate accelerations in antibody catalysis by strategic use of haptenic charge , 1995, Nature.

[12]  Eric A. Althoff,et al.  Kemp elimination catalysts by computational enzyme design , 2008, Nature.

[13]  P. Kollman,et al.  Atomic charges derived from semiempirical methods , 1990 .

[14]  Kevin Cowtan,et al.  research papers Acta Crystallographica Section D Biological , 2005 .

[15]  Jasmine L. Gallaher,et al.  Alteration of enzyme specificity by computational loop remodeling and design , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[16]  P. Kollman,et al.  A well-behaved electrostatic potential-based method using charge restraints for deriving atomic char , 1993 .

[17]  Gail J. Bartlett,et al.  Analysis of catalytic residues in enzyme active sites. , 2002, Journal of molecular biology.

[18]  David Baker,et al.  Evolutionary optimization of computationally designed enzymes: Kemp eliminases of the KE07 series. , 2010, Journal of molecular biology.

[19]  Arieh Warshel,et al.  On the relationship between thermal stability and catalytic power of enzymes. , 2007, Biochemistry.

[20]  Eric A. Althoff,et al.  De Novo Computational Design of Retro-Aldol Enzymes , 2008, Science.

[21]  Dan S. Tawfik,et al.  On the magnitude and specificity of medium effects in enzyme-like catalysts for proton transfer. , 2001, The Journal of organic chemistry.

[22]  Junmei Wang,et al.  How well does a restrained electrostatic potential (RESP) model perform in calculating conformational energies of organic and biological molecules? , 2000, J. Comput. Chem..

[23]  Dan S. Tawfik,et al.  Efficient Catalysis of Proton Transfer by Synzymes , 1997 .

[24]  D. Kemp,et al.  Physical organic chemistry of benzisoxazoles. I. Mechanism of the base-catalyzed decomposition of benzisoxazoles , 1973 .

[25]  David Baker,et al.  Evaluation and ranking of enzyme designs , 2010, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[26]  Colin A. Smith,et al.  Backrub-like backbone simulation recapitulates natural protein conformational variability and improves mutant side-chain prediction. , 2008, Journal of molecular biology.

[27]  W. L. Jorgensen,et al.  Comparison of simple potential functions for simulating liquid water , 1983 .

[28]  Dan S. Tawfik,et al.  Off-the-shelf proteins that rival tailor-made antibodies as catalysts , 1996, Nature.

[29]  D. Hilvert,et al.  Nonspecific medium effects versus specific group positioning in the antibody and albumin catalysis of the base-promoted ring-opening reactions of benzisoxazoles. , 2004, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[30]  A. J. Kirby,et al.  Enzyme Mechanisms, Models, and Mimics , 1996 .

[31]  Donald Hilvert,et al.  Structural origins of efficient proton abstraction from carbon by a catalytic antibody. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[32]  Jens Meiler,et al.  New algorithms and an in silico benchmark for computational enzyme design , 2006, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[33]  A. Warshel Electrostatic Origin of the Catalytic Power of Enzymes and the Role of Preorganized Active Sites* , 1998, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[34]  E. H. Wilson Origin , 1927, Bulletin of popular information - Arnold Arboretum, Harvard University..

[35]  Z. Otwinowski,et al.  Processing of X-ray diffraction data collected in oscillation mode. , 1997, Methods in enzymology.

[36]  J. Thornton,et al.  PROCHECK: a program to check the stereochemical quality of protein structures , 1993 .

[37]  D. Kemp,et al.  Physical organic chemistry of benzisoxazoles. IV. Origins and catalytic nature of the solvent rate acceleration for the decarboxylation of 3-carboxybenzisoxazoles , 1975 .

[38]  David S. Goodsell,et al.  A semiempirical free energy force field with charge‐based desolvation , 2007, J. Comput. Chem..

[39]  Ian W. Davis,et al.  The backrub motion: how protein backbone shrugs when a sidechain dances. , 2006, Structure.

[40]  Dan S. Tawfik,et al.  The moderately efficient enzyme: evolutionary and physicochemical trends shaping enzyme parameters. , 2011, Biochemistry.

[41]  P. Kollman,et al.  An approach to computing electrostatic charges for molecules , 1984 .

[42]  Dan S. Tawfik,et al.  Incorporating Synthetic Oligonucleotides via Gene Reassembly (ISOR): a versatile tool for generating targeted libraries. , 2007, Protein engineering, design & selection : PEDS.

[43]  Tanja Kortemme,et al.  Computer-aided design of functional protein interactions. , 2009, Nature chemical biology.