Interaction Effect of Stand Age and Diversity on Aboveground Wood Carbon Accumulation in Subtropical Mixed Forests of the Zhejiang Province (China)

Aboveground wood carbon (AWC) stocks in forest ecosystems are mediated by biotic and abiotic variables. Understanding the internal regulatory mechanisms of forests is important for future forest management and global climate change mitigation. However, how these factors affect AWC in subtropical mixed forests remains poorly understood. Using a database from the National Forest Inventory (NFI) from China, we observed the effects of climate variables (temperature and precipitation), stand structure indices (stand density and DBH coefficient of variation and diversity), stand diversity indices (taxonomic diversity, functional diversity, and phylogenetic diversity), and stand functional indices on coniferous mixed forests (CMF), coniferous–broadleaf mixed forests (CBMF), and broadleaf mixed forests (BMF). Meanwhile, we examined the AWC based on a linear mixed model and a structural equation model for each mixed forest. We found that both stand structure and stand diversity can affect the AWC through their indirect effects on the stand function, aligning with the niche complementarity effect. Stand age is an important factor affecting AWC because it interacts with stand structure and stand diversity. Our study highlights that AWC is dependent on the regulation of stand age and structure, which can be crucial for boosting high carbon stocks in subtropical forests.

[1]  M. Loreau,et al.  Multispecies forest plantations outyield monocultures across a broad range of conditions , 2022, Science.

[2]  Arshad Ali,et al.  Species evenness declines but specific functional strategy enhances aboveground biomass across strata in subtropical – Warm-temperate forests of South Korea , 2022, Forest Ecology and Management.

[3]  Arshad Ali,et al.  Big-sized trees and species-functional diversity pathways mediate divergent impacts of environmental factors on individual biomass variability in Sri Lankan tropical forests. , 2022, Journal of environmental management.

[4]  Philip Smith,et al.  The biodiversity and ecosystem service contributions and trade-offs of forest restoration approaches , 2022, Science.

[5]  Zuoqiang Yuan,et al.  Response of community diversity and productivity to canopy gap disturbance in subtropical forests , 2021, Forest Ecology and Management.

[6]  T. Eid,et al.  Species diversity and stand structural diversity of woody plants predominantly determine aboveground carbon stock of a dry Afromontane forest in Northern Ethiopia , 2021 .

[7]  Yutang Li,et al.  Mass‐ratio and complementarity effects simultaneously drive aboveground biomass in temperate Quercus forests through stand structure , 2021, Ecology and evolution.

[8]  Tianyao Lan,et al.  Spatial distribution characteristics of carbon storage density in typical mixed fir and broadleaf forests , 2021, Energy Reports.

[9]  A. Salehi,et al.  Tree-size dimension inequality shapes aboveground carbon stock across temperate forest strata along environmental gradients , 2021 .

[10]  Arshad Ali,et al.  Evolutionary diversity and species richness predict aboveground biomass better than tree size variation in local-scale tropical forest types of Nepal , 2021 .

[11]  F. Ullah,et al.  Stand structure determines aboveground biomass across temperate forest types and species mixture along a local-scale elevational gradient , 2021 .

[12]  Yutang Li,et al.  Biodiversity increased both productivity and its spatial stability in temperate forests in northeastern China. , 2021, The Science of the total environment.

[13]  Guomo Zhou,et al.  Vegetation Carbon Accumulation Driven by Stand Characteristics and Climatic Factors in Subtropical Forests of Southeastern China , 2021, Journal of Sustainable Forestry.

[14]  J. Bauhus,et al.  Biodiversity response to forest management intensity, carbon stocks and net primary production in temperate montane forests , 2021, Scientific Reports.

[15]  C. Peng,et al.  Stability in subtropical forests: The role of tree species diversity, stand structure, environmental and socio‐economic conditions , 2020, Global Ecology and Biogeography.

[16]  Xiu-ling Man,et al.  Increasing soil organic carbon and nitrogen stocks along with secondary forest succession in permafrost region of the Daxing’an mountains, northeast China , 2020 .

[17]  Fengri Li,et al.  Forest strata-dependent effects of vegetation attributes and soil nutrients on decadal changes in aboveground net carbon stock in two temperate forests , 2020 .

[18]  Yongjun Shi,et al.  Predicting Vegetation Carbon Density Distribution in different Terrains in Subtropical Forests in China , 2020 .

[19]  Kelin Wang,et al.  Stand Structure and Abiotic Factors Modulate Karst Forest Biomass in Southwest China , 2020, Forests.

[20]  Fengri Li,et al.  Soil nutrients, forest structure and species traits drive aboveground carbon dynamics in an old-growth temperate forest. , 2019, The Science of the total environment.

[21]  Mohammed A. Assen,et al.  Effects of land cover changes and slope gradient on soil quality in the Gumara watershed, Lake Tana basin of North–West Ethiopia , 2019, Modeling Earth Systems and Environment.

[22]  C. Peng,et al.  Effects of stand age, richness and density on productivity in subtropical forests in China , 2019, Journal of Ecology.

[23]  Wenhu Zhang,et al.  Carbon Storage Dynamics of Secondary Forest Succession in the Central Loess Plateau of China , 2019, Forests.

[24]  Han Y. H. Chen,et al.  Multiple abiotic and biotic drivers of aboveground biomass shift with forest stratum , 2019, Forest Ecology and Management.

[25]  Arshad Ali.  Forest stand structure and functioning: Current knowledge and future challenges , 2019, Ecological Indicators.

[26]  Bin Chen,et al.  Drivers of tree carbon storage in subtropical forests. , 2019, The Science of the total environment.

[27]  P. K. Bøcher,et al.  Topographic slope steepness and anthropogenic pressure interact to shape the distribution of tree cover in China , 2019, Applied Geography.

[28]  C. Wirth,et al.  The Future of Complementarity: Disentangling Causes from Consequences. , 2019, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[29]  Arshad Ali,et al.  Climatic water availability is the main limiting factor of biotic attributes across large-scale elevational gradients in tropical forests. , 2019, The Science of the total environment.

[30]  Hans-Jörg Vogel,et al.  Soil organic carbon storage as a key function of soils - A review of drivers and indicators at various scales , 2019, Geoderma.

[31]  R. T. Belote.  Species-Rich National Forests Experience More Intense Human Modification, but Why? , 2018, Forests.

[32]  Xiaojun Xu,et al.  Vegetation carbon stocks driven by canopy density and forest age in subtropical forest ecosystems. , 2018, The Science of the total environment.

[33]  M. Loreau,et al.  Aboveground carbon storage is driven by functional trait composition and stand structural attributes rather than biodiversity in temperate mixed forests recovering from disturbances , 2018, Annals of Forest Science.

[34]  Keping Ma,et al.  Carbon pools in China’s terrestrial ecosystems: New estimates based on an intensive field survey , 2018, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[35]  Guirui Yu,et al.  Climate change, human impacts, and carbon sequestration in China , 2018, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[36]  Liza S. Comita,et al.  Above‐ground biomass is driven by mass‐ratio effects and stand structural attributes in a temperate deciduous forest , 2018 .

[37]  Meng Wang,et al.  The China Plant Trait Database: toward a comprehensive regional compilation of functional traits for land plants. , 2017, Ecology.

[38]  Baozhang Chen,et al.  ClimateAP: an application for dynamic local downscaling of historical and future climate data in Asia Pacific , 2017 .

[39]  L. Poorter,et al.  Abiotic and biotic drivers of biomass change in a Neotropical forest , 2017 .

[40]  Arshad Ali,et al.  Community-weighted mean of leaf traits and divergence of wood traits predict aboveground biomass in secondary subtropical forests. , 2017, The Science of the total environment.

[41]  Filippo Bussotti,et al.  Positive biodiversity-productivity relationship predominant in global forests , 2016, Science.

[42]  YiChing Lin,et al.  Functional composition drives ecosystem function through multiple mechanisms in a broadleaved subtropical forest , 2016, Oecologia.

[43]  Changhui Peng,et al.  Significant effects of biodiversity on forest biomass during the succession of subtropical forest in south China , 2016 .

[44]  D. Coomes,et al.  Drivers of aboveground wood production in a lowland tropical forest of West Africa: teasing apart the roles of tree density, tree diversity, soil phosphorus, and historical logging , 2016, Ecology and evolution.

[45]  J. Bauhus,et al.  Structural diversity promotes productivity of mixed, uneven-aged forests in southwestern Germany , 2016, Oecologia.

[46]  Ellen I. Damschen,et al.  Integrative modelling reveals mechanisms linking productivity and plant species richness , 2016, Nature.

[47]  Francis K. C. Hui,et al.  Plant functional traits have globally consistent effects on competition , 2015, Nature.

[48]  I. Ercan,et al.  Journal of Modern Applied Statistical Methods Comparison of Model Fit Indices Used in Structural Equation Modeling under Multivariate Normality Comparison of Model Fit Indices Used in Structural Equation Modeling under Multivariate Normality , 2022 .

[49]  P. Balvanera,et al.  Diversity enhances carbon storage in tropical forests , 2015 .

[50]  Christopher N. Johnson,et al.  Combining paleo-data and modern exclosure experiments to assess the impact of megafauna extinctions on woody vegetation , 2015, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[51]  Han Y. H. Chen,et al.  Individual size inequality links forest diversity and above‐ground biomass , 2015 .

[52]  Markus Reichstein,et al.  Effects of climate extremes on the terrestrial carbon cycle: concepts, processes and potential future impacts , 2015, Global change biology.

[53]  Sandra Díaz,et al.  Does functional trait diversity predict above‐ground biomass and productivity of tropical forests? Testing three alternative hypotheses , 2015 .

[54]  Hans Pretzsch,et al.  Characterization of the structure, dynamics, and productivity of mixed-species stands: review and perspectives , 2015, European Journal of Forest Research.

[55]  A. Kerkhoff,et al.  Convergence of terrestrial plant production across global climate gradients , 2014, Nature.

[56]  Philippe Ciais,et al.  High carbon dioxide uptake by subtropical forest ecosystems in the East Asian monsoon region , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[57]  Yadvinder Malhi,et al.  Spatial patterns of above-ground structure, biomass and composition in a network of six Andean elevation transects , 2014 .

[58]  D. Forrester.  The spatial and temporal dynamics of species interactions in mixed-species forests: From pattern to process , 2014 .

[59]  C. Peng,et al.  Standing fine root mass and production in four Chinese subtropical forests along a succession and species diversity gradient , 2014, Plant and Soil.

[60]  R. B. Jackson,et al.  The Structure, Distribution, and Biomass of the World's Forests , 2013 .

[61]  K. Gebrehiwot,et al.  Altitudinal variation and conservation priorities of vegetation along the Great Rift Valley escarpment, northern Ethiopia , 2012, Biodiversity and Conservation.

[62]  J. Canadell,et al.  Spatial Patterns and Predictors of Forest Carbon Stocks in Western Mediterranean , 2012, Ecosystems.

[63]  Nicholas Mirotchnick,et al.  Phylogenetic diversity and the functioning of ecosystems. , 2012, Ecology letters.

[64]  Yves Rosseel,et al.  lavaan: An R Package for Structural Equation Modeling , 2012 .

[65]  R. B. Jackson,et al.  A Large and Persistent Carbon Sink in the World’s Forests , 2011, Science.

[66]  C. Messier,et al.  The effect of biodiversity on tree productivity: from temperate to boreal forests , 2011 .

[67]  C. Peng,et al.  Relationships between stand growth and structural diversity in spruce-dominated forests in New Brunswick, Canada. , 2009 .

[68]  J. Chave,et al.  Towards a Worldwide Wood Economics Spectrum 2 . L E a D I N G D I M E N S I O N S I N W O O D F U N C T I O N , 2022 .

[69]  G. Bonan.  Forests and Climate Change: Forcings, Feedbacks, and the Climate Benefits of Forests , 2008, Science.

[70]  Han Y. H. Chen,et al.  Effects of time since stand-replacing fire and overstory composition on live-tree structural diversity in the boreal forest of central Canada , 2008 .

[71]  Joseph Buongiorno,et al.  Effects of diversity of tree species and size on forest basal area growth, recruitment, and mortality , 2007 .

[72]  Linda S. Heath,et al.  Carbon sequestration in the U.S. forest sector from 1990 to 2010 , 2007 .

[73]  Campbell O. Webb,et al.  Regional and phylogenetic variation of wood density across 2456 Neotropical tree species. , 2006, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[74]  Eric Garnier,et al.  PLANT FUNCTIONAL MARKERS CAPTURE ECOSYSTEM PROPERTIES DURING SECONDARY SUCCESSION , 2004 .

[75]  Sean C. Thomas,et al.  The worldwide leaf economics spectrum , 2004, Nature.

[76]  M. Westoby,et al.  ECOLOGICAL STRATEGIES : Some Leading Dimensions of Variation Between Species , 2002 .

[77]  Michel Loreau,et al.  Partitioning selection and complementarity in biodiversity experiments , 2001, Nature.

[78]  D. Tilman.  THE ECOLOGICAL CONSEQUENCES OF CHANGES IN BIODIVERSITY: A SEARCH FOR GENERAL PRINCIPLES101 , 1999 .

[79]  P. Reich,et al.  The Influence of Functional Diversity and Composition on Ecosystem Processes , 1997 .

[80]  R. K. Dixon,et al.  Carbon Pools and Flux of Global Forest Ecosystems , 1994, Science.

[81]  D. Faith.  Conservation evaluation and phylogenetic diversity , 1992 .