Murine Broadly Reactive Antineuraminidase Monoclonal Antibodies Protect Mice from Recent Influenza B Virus Isolates and Partially Inhibit Virus Transmission in the Guinea Pig Model

The global health burden of influenza B viruses, especially in children, has long been underappreciated. Although two antigenically distinct influenza B virus lineages cocirculated before the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, the commonly used trivalent seasonal vaccines contain antigens from only one influenza B virus, providing limited cross-protection against viruses of the other lineage. ABSTRACT Current influenza virus vaccines and antivirals have limitations, some of which disproportionately affect their utilization against influenza B viruses. To inform ongoing efforts to address the considerable global burden of influenza B viruses, we previously described five murine monoclonal antibodies that broadly bind conserved epitopes on the neuraminidase of influenza B viruses and protect against lethal challenge in a mouse model when delivered via intraperitoneal injection. Here, we validate the continued relevance of these antibodies by demonstrating that their protective effects extend to lethal challenge with mouse-adapted influenza B viruses recently isolated from humans. We also found that humanization of murine antibodies 1F2 and 4F11 resulted in molecules that retain the ability to protect mice from lethal challenge when administered prophylactically. Intranasal administration as an alternative route of 1F2 delivery revealed no differences in the mouse challenge model compared to intraperitoneal injection, supporting further assessment of this more targeted and convenient administration method. Lastly, we evaluated the potential for intranasal 1F2 administration initiated 1 day after infection to prevent transmission of an influenza B virus between cocaged guinea pigs. Here, we observed a 40% rate of transmission with the 1F2 antibody administered to the infected donor compared to 100% transmission with administration of an irrelevant control antibody. These data suggest that intranasal administration could be a viable route of administration for antibody therapeutics. Collectively, these findings demonstrate the potential of broad antineuraminidase antibodies as therapeutics to prevent and treat infections caused by influenza B viruses. IMPORTANCE The global health burden of influenza B viruses, especially in children, has long been underappreciated. Although two antigenically distinct influenza B virus lineages cocirculated before the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, the commonly used trivalent seasonal vaccines contain antigens from only one influenza B virus, providing limited cross-protection against viruses of the other lineage. Additionally, studies have called into question the clinical effectiveness of the neuraminidase inhibitors that comprise the majority of available antivirals in treating influenza B virus infections. We previously described antibodies that bind broadly to neuraminidases of influenza B viruses across decades of antigenic evolution and potently protect mice against lethal challenge. Here we appraise additional factors to develop these antineuraminidase antibodies as antivirals to prevent and treat infections caused by an extensive range of influenza B viruses. In addition this work assesses recent clinical isolates belonging to the two influenza B virus lineages, finding evidence supporting the development of these antibodies for prophylactic and therapeutic use.

[1]  M. Tanriover,et al.  Cost Utility of Switching From Trivalent to Quadrivalent Influenza Vaccine in Turkey. , 2021, Value in health regional issues.

[2]  D. Fremont,et al.  Human Antibodies Targeting Influenza B Virus Neuraminidase Active Site Are Broadly Protective. , 2020, Immunity.

[3]  M. Wittekind,et al.  Airway Delivery of Anti-influenza Monoclonal Antibodies Results in Enhanced Antiviral Activities and Enables Broad-Coverage Combination Therapies , 2020, Journal of Virology.

[4]  E. Pariani,et al.  Co-circulation of the two influenza B lineages during 13 consecutive influenza surveillance seasons in Italy, 2004–2017 , 2019, BMC Infectious Diseases.

[5]  I. Wilson,et al.  Broadly protective human antibodies that target the active site of influenza virus neuraminidase , 2019, Science.

[6]  L. Brammer,et al.  The epidemiological signature of influenza B virus and its B/Victoria and B/Yamagata lineages in the 21st century , 2019, PloS one.

[7]  L. Gresh,et al.  Pre-existing Antineuraminidase Antibodies Are Associated With Shortened Duration of Influenza A(H1N1)pdm Virus Shedding and Illness in Naturally Infected Adults , 2019, Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America.

[8]  Nicole M. Bouvier,et al.  Mucosal Immunity against Neuraminidase Prevents Influenza B Virus Transmission in Guinea Pigs , 2019, mBio.

[9]  M. Kieny,et al.  Rationale for vaccination with trivalent or quadrivalent live attenuated influenza vaccines: Protective vaccine efficacy in the ferret model , 2018, PloS one.

[10]  Kazunari Hattori,et al.  In vitro characterization of baloxavir acid, a first‐in‐class cap‐dependent endonuclease inhibitor of the influenza virus polymerase PA subunit , 2018, Antiviral research.

[11]  David J. Topham,et al.  Influenza Infection in Humans Induces Broadly Cross-Reactive and Protective Neuraminidase-Reactive Antibodies , 2018, Cell.

[12]  Catharine I Paules,et al.  The Pathway to a Universal Influenza Vaccine. , 2017, Immunity.

[13]  S. Subramaniam,et al.  Broadly protective murine monoclonal antibodies against influenza B virus target highly conserved neuraminidase epitopes , 2017, Nature Microbiology.

[14]  M. Postma,et al.  A systematic review of the health economic consequences of quadrivalent influenza vaccination , 2017, Expert review of pharmacoeconomics & outcomes research.

[15]  S. Duwe Influenza viruses – antiviral therapy and resistance , 2017, GMS infectious diseases.

[16]  Paul E. Leon,et al.  Direct Administration in the Respiratory Tract Improves Efficacy of Broadly Neutralizing Anti-Influenza Virus Monoclonal Antibodies , 2015, Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy.

[17]  A. Hurt The epidemiology and spread of drug resistant human influenza viruses. , 2014, Current opinion in virology.

[18]  Nicole M. Bouvier,et al.  Transmission in the Guinea Pig Model , 2014, Current topics in microbiology and immunology.

[19]  Nicole M. Bouvier,et al.  Oseltamivir-Resistant Influenza A Viruses Are Transmitted Efficiently among Guinea Pigs by Direct Contact but Not by Aerosol , 2008, Journal of Virology.

[20]  John Steel,et al.  High Temperature (30°C) Blocks Aerosol but Not Contact Transmission of Influenza Virus , 2008, Journal of Virology.

[21]  R. Saito,et al.  Effectiveness of oseltamivir treatment among children with influenza A or B virus infections during four successive winters in Niigata City, Japan. , 2008, The Tohoku journal of experimental medicine.

[22]  S. Kashiwagi,et al.  A comparison of the effectiveness of oseltamivir for the treatment of influenza A and influenza B: a Japanese multicenter study of the 2003-2004 and 2004-2005 influenza seasons. , 2006, Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America.

[23]  F Y Aoki,et al.  Early administration of oral oseltamivir increases the benefits of influenza treatment. , 2003, The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy.