Measuring the social influences of scientist groups based on multiple types of collaboration relations

Abstract Scientists often collaborate with each other and may produce social influences through their collaboration on scientific activities. While the subject of ranking scientists has received significant attention in previous studies, these studies often examine the social influences of individual scientists and are based on the assumption that all collaborations between scientists are of the same type. However, these two limitations do not match real scientific collaborations. Currently, scientists are often associated with groups in which the scientists always study related research topics or have close collaboration relationships. Moreover, current scientists often collaborate through multiple relationship types, and different types of relationships may have different effects on the social influences of the scientists. To solve these two problems, this paper presents a model that measures the social influences of scientist groups based on multiple types of collaboration relationships. The model addresses two general group types (hierarchical and nonhierarchical) and two general collaboration situations: one is that the multiplex collaboration relationships are independent, and the other is that the multiplex collaboration relationships are correlated. The model mainly adopts the linear weighted sum methodology, which can make the time complexities of key algorithms low. Finally, we create some case studies and make experiments to demonstrate the effectiveness of our model.

[1]  M. Newman Coauthorship networks and patterns of scientific collaboration , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[2]  Robert Root-Bernstein,et al.  Correlations Between Avocations, Scientific Style, Work Habits, and Professional Impact of Scientists , 1995 .

[3]  Francis Y. L. Chin,et al.  Uniformly inserting points on square grid , 2011, Inf. Process. Lett..

[4]  Liang Wang,et al.  Benefit distribution mechanism in the team members’ scientific research collaboration network , 2014, Scientometrics.

[5]  Linyuan Lu,et al.  Quantifying the influence of scientists and their publications: Distinguish prestige from popularity , 2011, ArXiv.

[6]  Wanyuan Wang,et al.  Task Allocation for Undependable Multiagent Systems in Social Networks , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Parallel and Distributed Systems.

[7]  Didier Sornette,et al.  Discrete hierarchical organization of social group sizes , 2004, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[8]  Yichuan Jiang Locating active actors in the scientific collaboration communities based on interaction topology analyses , 2007, Scientometrics.

[9]  Liu Hai,et al.  Research and Applicatoin of Service-Oriented Scholar Cloud Platform , 2012 .

[10]  Jing Hu,et al.  Decision Making of Networked Multiagent Systems for Interaction Structures , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics - Part A: Systems and Humans.

[11]  Leo Egghe,et al.  An informetric model for the Hirsch-index , 2006, Scientometrics.

[12]  Z. Wang,et al.  The structure and dynamics of multilayer networks , 2014, Physics Reports.

[13]  Aijun An,et al.  Discovering top-k teams of experts with/without a leader in social networks , 2011, CIKM '11.

[14]  J. Fowler,et al.  Distance Measures for Dynamic Citation Networks , 2009, 0909.1819.

[15]  Yunpeng Li,et al.  Reliable Task Allocation with Load Balancing in Multiplex Networks , 2015, TAAS.

[16]  Noah E. Friedkin,et al.  Network Studies of Social Influence , 1993 .

[17]  Barry Bozeman,et al.  The Impact of Research Collaboration on Scientific Productivity , 2005 .

[18]  D. Crane Social Structure in a Group of Scientists: A Test of the "Invisible College" Hypothesis , 1969 .

[19]  Santo Fortunato,et al.  Diffusion of scientific credits and the ranking of scientists , 2009, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[20]  J. Koricheva,et al.  Does Scientific Collaboration Increase the Impact of Ecological Articles? , 2005 .

[21]  Yichuan Jiang Concurrent Collective Strategy Diffusion of Multiagents: The Spatial Model and Case Study , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part C (Applications and Reviews).

[22]  Ting Zhu,et al.  E-Sketch: Gathering large-scale energy consumption data based on consumption patterns , 2014, 2014 IEEE International Conference on Big Data (Big Data).

[23]  Jie Tang,et al.  ArnetMiner: extraction and mining of academic social networks , 2008, KDD.

[24]  Noah E. Friedkin Structural bases of interpersonal influence in groups: a longitudinal case study , 1993 .

[25]  Xueqi Cheng,et al.  Modeling the clustering in citation networks , 2011, ArXiv.

[26]  Menghui Li,et al.  Quantifying the influence of scientists and their publications: distinguishing between prestige and popularity , 2011, ArXiv.

[27]  M. Newman,et al.  The structure of scientific collaboration networks. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[28]  G. Bianconi Statistical mechanics of multiplex networks: entropy and overlap. , 2013, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[29]  Shu Fang,et al.  Evolving collaboration networks in Scientometrics in 1978–2010: a micro–macro analysis , 2012, Scientometrics.

[30]  Noah E. Friedkin,et al.  Social positions in influence networks , 1997 .

[31]  Francesco Giuliani,et al.  Assessing scientific collaboration through coauthorship and content sharing , 2010, Scientometrics.

[32]  Francis Y. L. Chin,et al.  Online Uniformly Inserting Points on Grid , 2010, AAIM.

[33]  Noriko Hara,et al.  An emerging view of scientific collaboration: Scientists' perspectives on collaboration and factors that impact collaboration , 2003, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[34]  Yichuan Jiang,et al.  The Rich Get Richer: Preferential Attachment in the Task Allocation of Cooperative Networked Multiagent Systems With Resource Caching , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics - Part A: Systems and Humans.

[35]  E. Kay,et al.  Graph Theory. An Algorithmic Approach , 1975 .

[36]  Wang Jian The Study on Transfer Technology of the Lowcarbon and Environment-Friendly Based on Game Theory , 2012 .

[37]  Ichiro Sakata,et al.  Link prediction in citation networks , 2012, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[38]  M E Newman,et al.  Scientific collaboration networks. I. Network construction and fundamental results. , 2001, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[39]  Hildrun Kretschmer,et al.  The structure of scientific collaboration networks in Scientometrics , 2008, Scientometrics.

[40]  Nicos Christofides,et al.  Graph theory: An algorithmic approach (Computer science and applied mathematics) , 1975 .

[41]  Mohammed Shahadat Uddin,et al.  Evolutionary dynamics of scientific collaboration networks: multi-levels and cross-time analysis , 2011, Scientometrics.

[42]  M. Newman,et al.  Finding community structure in very large networks. , 2004, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[43]  Conrado J. Pérez Vicente,et al.  Diffusion dynamics on multiplex networks , 2012, Physical review letters.