THE LICENSING OF GENITIVES

In this paper we attempt to clarify the nature of the relation between the possessor and a possessed concrete noun in an English genitive. It is argued that such a relation cannot be thematic, regardless of whether the head or the genitive marker is considered to be the theta role assigner. A view is outlined of both possession and modification which allows the possessor to be interpreted as a pure modifier. In addition, other cases of genitives are considered where the possessive item is either obligatorily (if present) or optionally coindexed with a Lexical Conceptual Structure (LCS) variable. The domain of the notion adjunct argument is modified to allow for the various relations a genitive may have to a head noun. This work supports a view of the Case Filter which considers case to be required by NPs rather than by arguments, and it is supported by the behaviour of post-nominal genitives.

[1]  Roderick A. Jacobs,et al.  Readings in English transformational grammar , 1970 .

[2]  Uriel Weinreich,et al.  On semantics , 1980 .

[3]  Adele E. Goldberg,et al.  Argument structure constructions , 1992 .

[4]  A. Wierzbicka.  5. Why can you have a drink when you can't *have an eat ? , 1982 .

[5]  Hansjakob Seiler,et al.  Possession : as an operational dimension of language , 1983 .

[6]  Tim Stowell,et al.  Origins of phrase structure , 1981 .

[7]  Noam Chomsky,et al.  Lectures on Government and Binding , 1981 .

[8]  M. Meyerhoff,et al.  Working papers in linguistics , 1994 .

[9]  Ray Jackendoff.  Semantics and Cognition , 1983 .

[10]  Ray Jackendoff,et al.  Semantic Interpretation in Generative Grammar , 1972 .

[11]  James D. McCawley,et al.  The syntactic phenomena of English , 1988 .

[12]  Noam Chomsky,et al.  Remarks on Nominalization , 2020, Nominalization.

[13]  Jean-Yves Pollock.  Verb movement, universal grammar and the structure of IP , 1989 .

[14]  Denis Bouchard,et al.  On the content of empty categories , 1982 .

[15]  Noam Chomsky.  Knowledge of language: its nature, origin, and use , 1988 .

[16]  Jeffrey S. Gruber,et al.  Lexical structures in syntax and semantics , 1976 .

[17]  S. J. Keyser,et al.  A view from the middle , 1987 .

[18]  Maria Luisa Zubizarreta,et al.  Levels of representation in the lexicon and in the syntax , 1987 .

[19]  Steven Abney,et al.  The English Noun Phrase in its Sentential Aspect , 1972 .

[20]  益子 真由美.  Argument Structure , 1993, The Lexicon.

[21]  Francesco Orilia,et al.  Semantics and Cognition , 1991 .

[22]  Elizabeth Cowper,et al.  Thematic underspecification: the case of have , 1989 .

[23]  Nancy Worrell Shumaker.  THE SEMANTICS OF THE ENGLISH 'S GENITIVE , 1975 .

[24]  Norbert Hornstein,et al.  Two Types of Locality , 1987 .

[25]  J. Grimshaw,et al.  Light verbs and 'th'-marking , 1988 .

[26]  Sally Mcconnell-Ginet.  ADVERBS AND LOGICAL FORM: A LINGUISTICALLY REALISTIC THEORY , 1982 .

[27]  William Cobbett,et al.  A Grammar Of The English Language , 1818 .

[28]  Ken Safir,et al.  The syntactic projection of lexical thematic structure , 1987 .

[29]  Naoki Fukui.  A theory of category projection and its applications , 1990 .

[30]  M. Anderson,et al.  PRENOMINAL GENITIVE NPs , 1983 .

[31]  Margaret Jean Speas,et al.  Adjunctions and projections in syntax , 1986 .