Assessment of personal exposures to Environmental Tobacco Smoke in British nonsmokers

Environmental Tobacco Smoke (ETS) exposure of 255 nonsmoking subjects was assessed by several methods. Each subject wore a personal air sampler for 24 h, answered a questionnaire about air quality and ETS exposure, and provided saliva samples for cotinine analysis before and after the monitoring period. The study was conducted in the Leeds and Harrogate areas of northern England. Median exposure to ETS particles was below the detection limit of 4 μg m−3. Median exposure to nicotine was 0.5 μg m−3 and median saliva cotinine levels were 0.7 ng mL−1 and 0.6 ng mL−1 for the pre- and post-cotinine samples. Median exposure to particles from all sources was 142 μg m−3. Approximately 80% of subjects assessed their ETS exposure as none or low. On average, the home made the greatest contribution to ETS exposure, followed by leisure, and then work. Travel was a minor contributor to exposure. Overall, subjects with a partner who smoked were exposed to more ETS than subjects with no partner or a nonsmoking partner. However, there was considerable overlap in the exposures of individuals within these groups. Where subjects assessed their ETS exposure as none or low, this was generally supported by the direct measurements of exposure. However, for exposure assessed as moderate or high there was a wide range in the corresponding direct measurements. There was a moderate correlation between exposure to nicotine and exposure to ETS particles (R2=0.66), but poor correlation between nicotine exposure and saliva cotinine levels (R2=0.07 for pre- and R2=0.13 for postcotinine samples). Overall, ETS made only a small (median 2.5%) contribution to particles from all sources as collected by the personal monitor. Exposure to ETS particles did not correlate (R2=0.04) with exposure to particles from all sources. Out of 327 volunteers recruited as nonsmokers for this study, 53 (16%) were identified as likely smokers by saliva cotinine levels or detailed questioning.

[1]  M. W. Ogden,et al.  Effect of ventilation and sampling time on environmental tobacco smoke component ratios , 1992 .

[2]  C. Monn,et al.  Concentrations of total suspended particulates, fine particles and their anionic compounds in ambient air and Indoor air , 1993 .

[3]  M. Jaakkola,et al.  Questionnaire assessments of recent exposure to environmental tobacco smoke in relation to salivary cotinine. , 1993, The European respiratory journal.

[4]  D. Saw,et al.  Measurements of passive smoking and estimates of lung cancer risk among non‐smoking chinese females , 1987, International journal of cancer.

[5]  Gerald J. Nehls,et al.  Procedures for Handling Aerometric Data , 1973 .

[6]  Bruce A. Tomkins,et al.  The Chemistry of Environmental Tobacco Smoke: Composition and Measurement, Second Edition , 1992 .

[7]  James L. Repace,et al.  An enforceable indoor air quality standard for environmental tobacco smoke in the workplace. , 1993, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[8]  R. West,et al.  Saliva cotinine as an indicator of cigarette smoking in adolescents. , 1987, British journal of addiction.

[9]  J. Samet,et al.  Questionnaire assessment of lifetime and recent exposure to environmental tobacco smoke. , 1989, American journal of epidemiology.

[10]  P. Lee Lung cancer and passive smoking: Association an artefact due to misclassification of smoking habits?☆ , 1987 .

[11]  P. Lee Misclassification of Smoking Habits and Passive Smoking , 1988, International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health Supplement.

[12]  C. Proctor,et al.  A comparison of methods of assessing exposure to environmental tobacco smoke in non-smoking British women , 1991 .

[13]  R. Etzel A review of the use of saliva cotinine as a marker of tobacco smoke exposure. , 1990, Preventive medicine.