Remote Ischemic Preconditioning in Children Undergoing Cardiac Surgery With Cardiopulmonary Bypass: A Single‐Center Double‐Blinded Randomized Trial

Background Remote ischemic preconditioning (RIPC) harnesses an innate defensive mechanism that protects against inflammatory activation and ischemia‐reperfusion injury, known sequelae of cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass. We sought to determine the impact of RIPC on clinical outcomes and physiological markers related to ischemia‐reperfusion injury and inflammatory activation after cardiac surgery in children. Methods and Results Overall, 299 children (aged neonate to 17 years) were randomized to receive an RIPC stimulus (inflation of a blood pressure cuff on the left thigh to 15 mm Hg above systolic for four 5‐minute intervals) versus a blinded sham stimulus during induction with a standardized anesthesia protocol. Primary outcome was duration of postoperative hospital stay, with serial clinical and laboratory measurements for the first 48 postoperative hours and clinical follow‐up to discharge. There were no significant baseline differences between RIPC (n=148) and sham (n=151). There were no in‐hospital deaths. No significant difference in length of postoperative hospital stay was noted (sham 5.4 versus RIPC 5.6 days; difference +0.2; adjusted P=0.91), with the 95% confidence interval (−0.7 to +0.9) excluding a prespecified minimal clinically significant differences of 1 or 1.5 days. There were few significant differences in other clinical outcomes or values at time points or trends in physiological markers. Benefit was not observed in specific subgroups when explored through interactions with categories of age, sex, surgery type, Aristotle score, or first versus second half of recruitment. Adverse events were similar (sham 5%, RIPC 6%; P=0.68). Conclusions RIPC is not associated with important improvements in clinical outcomes and physiological markers after cardiac surgery in children. Clinical Trial Registration URL: clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00650507.

[1]  C. Brizard,et al.  Remote ischemic preconditioning in cyanosed neonates undergoing cardiopulmonary bypass: a randomized controlled trial. , 2013, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[2]  J. Zhao,et al.  Cardioprotective effect of remote ischemic postconditioning on children undergoing cardiac surgery: a randomized controlled trial , 2013, Paediatric anaesthesia.

[3]  Matthew S. Yong,et al.  Effect of Remote Ischemic Preconditioning on Phosphorylated Protein Signaling in Children Undergoing Tetralogy of Fallot Repair: A Randomized Controlled Trial , 2013, Journal of the American Heart Association.

[4]  M. Weatherall,et al.  A systematic review and meta-analysis of the cardioprotective effects of remote ischaemic preconditioning in open cardiac surgery , 2012, Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine.

[5]  F. Carmona,et al.  Late remote ischemic preconditioning in children undergoing cardiopulmonary bypass: a randomized controlled trial. , 2012, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[6]  V. Hjortdal,et al.  Failure of remote ischemic preconditioning to reduce the risk of postoperative acute kidney injury in children undergoing operation for complex congenital heart disease: a randomized single-center study. , 2012, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[7]  A. Lotfi,et al.  Effect of remote ischemic preconditioning on myocardial and renal injury: meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. , 2012, The Journal of invasive cardiology.

[8]  E. Lucchinetti,et al.  Remote Ischemic Preconditioning Applied during Isoflurane Inhalation Provides No Benefit to the Myocardium of Patients Undergoing On-pump Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery: Lack of Synergy or Evidence of Antagonism in Cardioprotection? , 2012, Anesthesiology.

[9]  G. Heusch,et al.  STAT5 Activation and Cardioprotection by Remote Ischemic Preconditioning in Humans , 2012, Circulation research.

[10]  D. Yellon,et al.  Investigating the Signal Transduction Pathways Underlying Remote Ischemic Conditioning in the Porcine Heart , 2012, Cardiovascular Drugs and Therapy.

[11]  D. Yellon,et al.  The therapeutic potential of ischemic conditioning: an update , 2011, Nature Reviews Cardiology.

[12]  R. Gladstone,et al.  Remote preconditioning provides potent cardioprotection via PI3K/Akt activation and is associated with nuclear accumulation of β-catenin. , 2011, Clinical science.

[13]  Yangde Zhang,et al.  A comparison of cardiac post-conditioning and remote pre-conditioning in paediatric cardiac surgery , 2011, Cardiology in the Young.

[14]  C. Terkelsen,et al.  Remote ischaemic conditioning before hospital admission, as a complement to angioplasty, and effect on myocardial salvage in patients with acute myocardial infarction: a randomised trial , 2010, The Lancet.

[15]  I. Konstantinov,et al.  Remote Ischemic Conditioning: Evolution of the Concept, Mechanisms, and Clinical Application , 2010, Journal of cardiac surgery.

[16]  L. Sharples,et al.  Cardiac Remote Ischemic Preconditioning in Coronary Stenting (CRISP Stent) Study: A Prospective, Randomized Control Trial , 2009, Circulation.

[17]  Zhou Xinmin,et al.  Limb Ischemic Preconditioning Reduces Heart and Lung Injury After an Open Heart Operation in Infants , 2009, Pediatric Cardiology.

[18]  H. Takagi,et al.  Review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled clinical trials of remote ischemic preconditioning in cardiovascular surgery. , 2008, The American journal of cardiology.

[19]  E. Vicaut,et al.  Sevoflurane preconditioning at 1 MAC only provides limited protection in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery: a randomized bi-centre trial. , 2007, British journal of anaesthesia.

[20]  M. Hayward,et al.  Effect of remote ischaemic preconditioning on myocardial injury in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft surgery: a randomised controlled trial , 2007, The Lancet.

[21]  E. Berenshtein,et al.  Flumazenil Mimics whereas Midazolam Abolishes Ischemic Preconditioning in a Rabbit Heart Model of Ischemia–Reperfusion , 2006, Anesthesiology.

[22]  I. Konstantinov,et al.  Randomized controlled trial of the effects of remote ischemic preconditioning on children undergoing cardiac surgery: first clinical application in humans. , 2006, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[23]  I. Konstantinov,et al.  The remote ischemic preconditioning stimulus modifies gene expression in mouse myocardium. , 2005, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[24]  I. Konstantinov,et al.  The remote ischemic preconditioning stimulus modifies inflammatory gene expression in humans. , 2004, Physiological genomics.

[25]  S. D. De Hert,et al.  Cardioprotective Properties of Sevoflurane in Patients Undergoing Coronary Surgery with Cardiopulmonary Bypass Are Related to the Modalities of Its Administration , 2004, Anesthesiology.

[26]  D. Liem,et al.  Transient limb ischemia induces remote ischemic preconditioning in vivo. , 2003, Circulation.

[27]  R. Ungerleider,et al.  Optimizing response of the neonate and infant to cardiopulmonary bypass. , 2003, Seminars in thoracic and cardiovascular surgery. Pediatric cardiac surgery annual.

[28]  G. Hill The Inflammatory Response to Cardiopulmonary Bypass , 1996, International anesthesiology clinics.

[29]  S Westaby,et al.  Inflammatory response to cardiopulmonary bypass. , 1993, The Annals of thoracic surgery.