Institutional entrepreneurship in the platform economy: How Uber tried (and failed) to change the Dutch taxi law

Abstract Platform innovations like Uber and Airbnb allow peers to transact outside established market institutions. From an institutional perspective, platform companies follow a reverse innovation process compared to innovation within traditional regulatory systems: they first launch their online platform and ask for government permission only later. We analyze the emergence of Uber as an institutional entrepreneur in The Netherlands and the strategies it employed in a failed attempt to get its UberPop service legalized through changes in Dutch taxi law. We conclude that Uber’s failure to change the Dutch taxi law stemmed from the difficulty to leverage pragmatic legitimacy among users into favorable regulatory changes in a highly institutionalized regime, because Uber’s institutional work strategies were not aligned.

[1]  J. Dijck,et al.  The Platform Society: Public Values in a Connective World , 2018 .

[2]  Arie Rip,et al.  The Nelson-Winter-Dosi model and synthetic dye chemistry , 1987 .

[3]  Marko P. Hekkert,et al.  Technological innovation systems in contexts: conceptualizing contextual structures and interaction dynamics , 2015 .

[4]  A. Bryman.  Social Research Methods , 2001 .

[5]  N. Phillips,et al.  The Birth of the 'Kodak Moment': Institutional Entrepreneurship and the Adoption of New Technologies , 2005 .

[6]  B. Truffer,et al.  The interplay of institutions, actors and technologies in socio-technical systems — An analysis of transformations in the Australian urban water sector , 2016 .

[7]  Andrei Hagiu,et al.  Platform Rules: Multi-Sided Platforms as Regulators , 2008 .

[8]  J. Mair,et al.  How Organizations Strategically Govern Online Communities: Lessons from the Sharing Economy , 2018, Academy of Management Discoveries.

[9]  K. Frenken,et al.  Putting the sharing economy into perspective , 2017, A Research Agenda for Sustainable Consumption Governance.

[10]  Bart Bossink,et al.  Institutional entrepreneurship in sustainable urban development: Dutch successes as inspiration for transformation , 2013 .

[11]  D. Banister,et al.  The Rise of Uber and Regulating the Disruptive Innovator , 2017 .

[12]  M. Perkmann,et al.  `Healing the Scars of History': Projects, Skills and Field Strategies in Institutional Entrepreneurship , 2007 .

[13]  John W. Meyer,et al.  Institutional conditions for diffusion , 1993 .

[14]  Mark C. Suchman.  Managing Legitimacy: Strategic and Institutional Approaches , 1995 .

[15]  A. Kumaraswamy,et al.  INSTITUTIONAL ENTREPRENEURSHIP IN THE SPONSORSHIP OF COMMON TECHNOLOGICAL STANDARDS: THE CASE OF SUN MICROSYSTEMS AND JAVA * , 2002 .

[16]  M. Perkmann,et al.  How are management fashions institutionalized? The role of institutional work , 2008 .

[17]  M. Lounsbury,et al.  Pathways of Institutional Change: An Integrative Review and Research Agenda , 2017 .

[18]  Rob Raven,et al.  What is protective space? Reconsidering niches in transitions to sustainability , 2012 .

[19]  B. Latour.  Give me a Laboratory and 1 will raise the Word , 1983 .

[20]  Briony Cathryn Rogers,et al.  Analysis of institutional work on innovation trajectories in water infrastructure systems of Melbourne, Australia , 2015 .

[21]  R. Cowan.  Nuclear Power Reactors: A Study in Technological Lock-in , 1990, The Journal of Economic History.

[22]  V. Zelizer.  Human Values and the Market: The Case of Life Insurance and Death in 19th-Century America , 1978, American Journal of Sociology.

[23]  J. Mair,et al.  Capturing the dynamics of the sharing economy: Institutional research on the plural forms and practices of sharing economy organizations , 2017 .

[24]  W. Creed,et al.  Institutional Contradictions, Praxis, and Institutional Change: A Dialectical Perspective , 2002 .

[25]  Royston Greenwood,et al.  Digital innovation and transformation: An institutional perspective , 2018, Inf. Organ..

[26]  S. Sarasvathy,et al.  The Coevolution of Institutional Entrepreneurship: A Tale of Two Theories , 2010 .

[27]  J. P. Coen Rigtering,et al.  Sharing and Shaping: A Cross-Country Comparison of How Sharing Economy Firms Shape Their Institutional Environment to Gain Legitimacy , 2018, Academy of Management Discoveries.

[28]  B. Truffer,et al.  The thorny road to technology legitimation — Institutional work for potable water reuse in California , 2016 .

[29]  Tomas Karlsson,et al.  Beyond Red Tape and Fools: Institutional Theory in Entrepreneurship Research, 1992–2014 , 2017 .

[30]  Paul DiMaggio.  Interest and Agency in Institutional Theory , 1988 .

[31]  Ruha Benjamin,et al.  The rise of the platform economy , 2016 .

[32]  Simona Negro,et al.  Institutionalisation of markets: The case of personalised cancer medicine in the Netherlands , 2017 .

[33]  S. Bakker.  Actor rationales in sustainability transitions – Interests and expectations regarding electric vehicle recharging , 2014 .

[34]  R. Cervero,et al.  Just a better taxi? A survey-based comparison of taxis, transit, and ridesourcing services in San Francisco , 2016 .

[35]  F. Geels.  Technological transitions as evolutionary reconfiguration processes: a multi-level perspective and a case-study , 2002 .

[36]  S. Nambisan.  Digital Entrepreneurship: Toward a Digital Technology Perspective of Entrepreneurship , 2017 .

[37]  Mary Tripsas,et al.  Thinking About Technology: Applying a Cognitive Lens to Technical Change , 2008 .

[38]  D. Snow,et al.  Framing Processes and Social Movements: An Overview and Assessment , 2000 .

[39]  B. Leca,et al.  How actors change institutions: Towards a theory of institutional entrepreneurship , 2009 .

[40]  A. Gawer.  Bridging differing perspectives on technological platforms: Toward an integrative framework , 2014 .

[41]  T. Lawrence,et al.  Institutions and Institutional Work , 2006 .

[42]  Linda Markowitz,et al.  Structural Innovators and Core-Framing Tasks: How Socially Responsible Mutual Fund Companies Build Identity among Investors , 2007 .

[43]  Kathleen Thelen,et al.  Regulating Uber: The Politics of the Platform Economy in Europe and the United States , 2018, Perspectives on Politics.

[44]  Vilmos F. Misangyi,et al.  Ending Corruption: The Interplay Among Institutional Logics, Resources, and Institutional Entrepreneurs , 2008 .

[45]  Marko P. Hekkert,et al.  Institutional power play in innovation systems: The case of Herceptin® , 2016 .

[46]  Bernhard Truffer,et al.  The structuration of socio-technical regimes—Conceptual foundations from institutional theory , 2014 .

[47]  Mustafa Emirbayer,et al.  What Is Agency?1 , 1998, American Journal of Sociology.

[48]  René Bohnsack,et al.  The institutional evolution process of the global solar industry: The role of public and private actors in creating institutional shifts , 2016 .

[49]  T. D'Aunno,et al.  Institutional Work and the Paradox of Embedded Agency , 2009 .

[50]  Uber Über regulation? Regulatory change following the emergence of new technologies in the taxi market , 2019 .

[51]  Tianxu Chen,et al.  Research on technology standards: Accomplishment and challenges , 2012 .