EDAS ve WASPAS yöntemleriyle tıbbi malzeme tedarikçisi belirleme

Bu çalışmanın amacı bir sağlık kuruluşunda yapılan boyun fıtığı, bel fıtığı ve omurga ameliyatlarında kullanılacak olan tıbbi malzemeler için en uygun tedarikçi firmayı belirlemektir. Bu süreçte malzemelerin uygun şekilde tedarikine ilave olarak tedarikçi firmanın da hizmet vermesi gerekmektedir. Bu nedenle kuruluş için, hekim ve hasta memnuniyetini en üst seviyeye çıkaracak tedarikçiyi belirlemek çok önemli olmaktadır. Bu süreç çok kriterli karar verme (ÇKKV) problemi olarak da görülmektedir. Bu nedenle problemi çözmek için ÇKKV yöntemlerinden Step-Wise Weight Assessment Ratio Analysis (SWARA), Evaluation based on Distance from Average Solution (EDAS) ve Weighted Aggregated Sum Product ASsessment (WASPAS) yöntemleri bütünleşik olarak kullanılarak en uygun tedarikçi firma belirlenmiştir. SWARA ile kriter ağırlıkları belirlenirken, EDAS ve WASPAS yöntemleri ile tedarikçiler, kriterler dikkate alınarak değerlendirilmiştir. Ayrıca duyarlılık analizi yapılarak kriter ağırlıklarının tedarikçi seçimindeki olası etkileri ortaya çıkarılmıştır. Yöntemlerin uygulanması neticesinde en uygun tedarikçinin EDAS’a göre T1, WASPAS’a göre ise T2 olduğu belirlenmiştir. T3 her iki yönteme göre de son sırada yer almıştır.

[1]  M. Tavana,et al.  An extended hybrid fuzzy multi-criteria decision model for sustainable and resilient supplier selection , 2022, Environmental Science and Pollution Research.

[2]  Peide Liu,et al.  SUSTAINABLE MEDICAL SUPPLIER SELECTION BASED ON MULTI-GRANULARITY PROBABILISTIC LINGUISTIC TERM SETS , 2022, Technological and Economic Development of Economy.

[3]  Jalel Euchi,et al.  Using Integrated MMD-TOPSIS to Solve the Supplier Selection and Fair Order Allocation Problem: A Tunisian Case Study , 2022, Logistics.

[4]  Rahmi Baki,et al.  An Integrated Multi-criteria Structural Equation Model for Green Supplier Selection , 2022, International Journal of Precision Engineering and Manufacturing-Green Technology.

[5]  Paulius Skačkauskas,et al.  A Combined Interval Type-2 Fuzzy MCDM Framework for the Resilient Supplier Selection Problem , 2021, Mathematics.

[6]  Chong Wu,et al.  An integrated decision-making approach for sustainable supplier selection in the chemical industry , 2021, Expert Syst. Appl..

[7]  Jindan Wang,et al.  Sustainable supplier selection for SMEs based on an extended PROMETHEE Ⅱ approach , 2021, Journal of Cleaner Production.

[8]  Ali Ebadi Torkayesh,et al.  “A multi-tier sustainable food supplier selection model under uncertainty” , 2021, Operations Management Research.

[9]  Morteza Yazdani,et al.  A Hybrid MCDM Approach towards Resilient Sourcing , 2021, Sustainability.

[10]  Fatih Ecer,et al.  Sustainable supplier selection: A novel integrated fuzzy best worst method (F-BWM) and fuzzy CoCoSo with Bonferroni (CoCoSo’B) multi-criteria model , 2020 .

[11]  Yanfeng Li,et al.  An Approach for Resilient-Green Supplier Selection Based on WASPAS, BWM, and TOPSIS under Intuitionistic Fuzzy Sets , 2020 .

[12]  H. Gupta,et al.  A hybrid decision model for supplier selection in Online Fashion Retail (OFR) , 2020, International Journal of Logistics Research and Applications.

[13]  Ahmed Mohammed,et al.  Towards ‘gresilient’ supply chain management: A quantitative study , 2020 .

[14]  Naveen K. Jain,et al.  Sustainable supplier selection under attractive criteria through FIS and integrated fuzzy MCDM techniques , 2020 .

[15]  Prasenjit Chatterjee,et al.  Sustainable supplier selection in healthcare industries using a new MCDM method: Measurement of alternatives and ranking according to COmpromise solution (MARCOS) , 2020, Comput. Ind. Eng..

[16]  Babak Daneshvar Rouyendegh,et al.  Intuitionistic Fuzzy TOPSIS method for green supplier selection problem , 2020, Soft Comput..

[17]  S. Meysam Mousavi,et al.  An integrated weighting and ranking model based on entropy, DEA and PCA considering two aggregation approaches for resilient supplier selection problem , 2020, J. Comput. Sci..

[18]  N. Doğan,et al.  Sağlık Sektöründe Tedarikçi Seçim Kararının AHP Yöntemi İle İncelenmesi: Bir Üniversite Hastanesi Örneği , 2019 .

[19]  Yongming Song,et al.  A large-scale group decision-making with incomplete multi-granular probabilistic linguistic term sets and its application in sustainable supplier selection , 2019, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[20]  Kevin Cullinane,et al.  A comparison of fuzzy DEA and fuzzy TOPSIS in sustainable supplier selection: Implications for sourcing strategy , 2019, Expert Syst. Appl..

[21]  Md. Noor-E-Alam,et al.  Resilient supplier selection in logistics 4.0 with heterogeneous information , 2019, Expert Syst. Appl..

[22]  Victor I. Chang,et al.  An integrated neutrosophic ANP and VIKOR method for achieving sustainable supplier selection: A case study in importing field , 2019, Comput. Ind..

[23]  Yan-Kai Fu,et al.  An integrated approach to catering supplier selection using AHP-ARAS-MCGP methodology , 2019, Journal of Air Transport Management.

[24]  S. Ali Torabi,et al.  Strategic supplier selection under sustainability and risk criteria , 2019, International Journal of Production Economics.

[25]  Hamidreza Fallah Lajimi,et al.  Resilient supplier selection and segmentation in grey environment , 2019, Journal of Cleaner Production.

[26]  Prasenjit Chatterjee,et al.  Comparative Evaluation of Sustainable Design Based on Step-Wise Weight Assessment Ratio Analysis (SWARA) and Best Worst Method (BWM) Methods: A Perspective on Household Furnishing Materials , 2019, Symmetry.

[27]  Aşır Özbek,et al.  AHS VE SWARA YÖNTEMLERİ İLE YEM SEKTÖRÜNDE İŞ SAĞLIĞI VE GÜVENLİĞİ KRİTERLERİNİN AĞIRLIKLANDIRILMASI , 2018, İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi.

[28]  Atefeh Amindoust,et al.  A resilient-sustainable based supplier selection model using a hybrid intelligent method , 2018, Comput. Ind. Eng..

[29]  Yong Deng,et al.  DS-VIKOR: A New Multi-criteria Decision-Making Method for Supplier Selection , 2018, International Journal of Fuzzy Systems.

[30]  Shahram Ariafar,et al.  Selecting sustainable supplier countries for Iran's steel industry at three levels by using AHP and TOPSIS methods , 2018, Resources Policy.

[31]  Xinguo Ming,et al.  A Rough Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Approach for Sustainable Supplier Selection under Vague Environment , 2018, Sustainability.

[32]  Yu Zhang,et al.  Green supply chain management, economic growth and environment: A GMM based evidence , 2018, Journal of Cleaner Production.

[33]  Aşır Özbek.  FORTUNE 500 LİSTESİNDE YER ALAN LOJİSTİK FİRMALARIN DEĞERLENDİRİLMESİ , 2018, İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi.

[34]  Jurgita Antucheviciene,et al.  A Novel Rough WASPAS Approach for Supplier Selection in a Company Manufacturing PVC Carpentry Products , 2018, Inf..

[35]  Aşır Özbek.  BİST’te İşlem Gören Faktoring Şirketlerinin Mali Yapılarının Çok Ölçütlü Karar Verme Yöntemleri İle Değerlendirilmesi , 2018 .

[36]  Mohamed Abdel-Basset,et al.  A hybrid approach of neutrosophic sets and DEMATEL method for developing supplier selection criteria , 2018, Des. Autom. Embed. Syst..

[37]  Jalil Heidary Dahooie,et al.  Competency‐based IT personnel selection using a hybrid SWARA and ARAS‐G methodology , 2018 .

[38]  A. Işık,et al.  BİR TEDARİKÇİ SEÇİM PROBLEMİ İÇİN SWARA VE WASPAS YÖNTEMLERİNE DAYANAN KARAR VERME YAKLAŞIMI , 2017 .

[39]  Hu-Chen Liu,et al.  Developing sustainable supplier selection criteria for solar air-conditioner manufacturer: An integrated approach , 2017 .

[40]  Engin Çakır,et al.  Selecting Contractor Company in Urban Transformation Using SWARA - Gray Relationship Analysis Method , 2017 .

[41]  Kuan Yew Wong,et al.  A decision support model for sustainable supplier selection in sustainable supply chain management , 2017, Comput. Ind. Eng..

[42]  Dipika Pramanik,et al.  Resilient supplier selection using AHP-TOPSIS-QFD under a fuzzy environment , 2017 .

[43]  Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas,et al.  Multi-criteria evaluation of green suppliers using an extended WASPAS method with interval type-2 fuzzy sets , 2016 .

[44]  S. PrasannaVenkatesan,et al.  Multi-objective supplier selection and order allocation under disruption risk , 2016 .

[45]  Anthony S.F. Chiu,et al.  Improving sustainable supply chain management using a novel hierarchical grey-DEMATEL approach , 2016 .

[46]  Xinwang Liu,et al.  An interval type-2 fuzzy sets-based TODIM method and its application to green supplier selection , 2016, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[47]  Jurgita Antucheviciene,et al.  A Hybrid Model Based on Fuzzy AHP and Fuzzy WASPAS for Construction Site Selection , 2015, Int. J. Comput. Commun. Control.

[48]  Dragisa Stanujkic,et al.  A framework for the Selection of a packaging design based on the SWARA method , 2015 .

[49]  Jurgita Antuchevičienė,et al.  Using QSPM and WASPAS methods for determining outsourcing strategies , 2014 .

[50]  Zenonas Turskis,et al.  Integrated evaluation of external wall insulation in residential buildings using SWARA-TODIM MCDM method , 2014 .

[51]  Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas,et al.  Decision making on business issues with foresight perspective; an application of new hybrid MCDM model in shopping mall locating , 2013, Expert Syst. Appl..

[52]  Jurgita Antuchevičienė,et al.  ASSESSMENT OF HEALTH AND SAFETY SOLUTIONS AT A CONSTRUCTION SITE , 2013 .

[53]  Sarfaraz Hashemkhani Zolfani,et al.  A novel hybrid SWARA and VIKOR methodology for supplier selection in an agile environment , 2013 .

[54]  James Nga-Kwok Liu,et al.  Application of decision-making techniques in supplier selection: A systematic review of literature , 2013, Expert Syst. Appl..

[55]  E. Zavadskas,et al.  Optimization of Weighted Aggregated Sum Product Assessment , 2012 .

[56]  S. Vinodh,et al.  Application of fuzzy VIKOR and environmental impact analysis for material selection of an automotive component , 2012 .

[57]  Zenonas Turskis,et al.  Integrated Fuzzy Multiple Criteria Decision Making Model for Architect Selection , 2012 .

[58]  Amitava Ray,et al.  A hybrid MCDM model for resilient supplier selection , 2012 .

[59]  V. Nguyen,et al.  Spherical Fuzzy Multicriteria Decision-Making Model for Wind Turbine Supplier Selection in a Renewable Energy Project , 2022 .

[60]  Ta-Chun Wen,et al.  Integrating the 2-tuple linguistic representation and soft set to solve supplier selection problems with incomplete information , 2020, Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell..

[61]  Paul K. Shum,et al.  A game theoretic decision model for organic food supplier evaluation in the global supply chains , 2020 .

[62]  K. Govindan,et al.  Multi-tier sustainable global supplier selection using a fuzzy AHP-VIKOR based approach , 2018 .

[63]  Reza Farzipoor Saen,et al.  Future planning for benchmarking and ranking sustainable suppliers using goal programming and robust double frontiers DEA , 2017 .

[64]  Chandra Prakash Garg,et al.  An integrated framework for sustainable supplier selection and evaluation in supply chains , 2017 .

[65]  Shankar Chakraborty,et al.  A study on the ranking performance of some MCDM methods for industrial robot selection problems , 2016 .

[66]  Sameer Kumar,et al.  A comprehensive environment friendly approach for supplier selection , 2014 .

[67]  Jurgita Antucheviciene,et al.  Multi-criteria Assessment of Facades’ Alternatives: Peculiarities of Ranking Methodology☆ , 2013 .

[68]  S. Vinodh,et al.  Application of fuzzy analytic network process for supplier selection in a manufacturing organisation , 2011, Expert Syst. Appl..