Where is the moving object now? Judgments of instantaneous position show poor temporal precision (SD = 70 ms).

Humans can precisely judge relative location between two objects moving with the same speed and direction, as numerous studies have shown. However, the precision for localizing a single moving object relative to stationary references remains a neglected topic. Here, subjects reported the perceived location of a moving object at the time of a cue. The variability of the reported positions increased steeply with the speed of the object, such that the distribution of responses corresponds to the distance that the object traveled in 70 ms. This surprisingly large temporal imprecision depends little on the characteristics of the trajectory of the moving object or of the cue that indicates when to judge the position. We propose that the imprecision reflects a difficulty in identifying which position of the moving object occurs at the same time as the cue. This high-level process may involve the same low temporal resolution binding mechanism that, in other situations, pairs simultaneous features such as color and motion.

[1]  G Westheimer,et al.  Editorial: Visual acuity and hyperacuity. , 1975, Investigative ophthalmology.

[2]  Markus Lappe,et al.  The Position of Moving Objects , 1998, Science.

[3]  Kenji Yokoi,et al.  Object-Based Anisotropies in the Flash-Lag Effect , 2006, Psychological science.

[4]  Frans A. J. Verstraten,et al.  Limits of attentive tracking reveal temporal properties of attention , 2000, Vision Research.

[5]  W. H. Ehrenstein,et al.  A constant latency difference determines directional anisotropy in visual motion perception , 1991, Vision Research.

[6]  M. Lappe,et al.  The position of moving objects. , 2000, Perception.

[7]  Kenji Yokoi,et al.  Dynamic distortion of visual position representation around moving objects. , 2008, Journal of vision.

[8]  Haluk Ogmen,et al.  Attraction of flashes to moving dots , 2007, Vision Research.

[9]  Derek H. Arnold,et al.  Perceptual pairing of colour and motion , 2005, Vision Research.

[10]  G W Hopkins,et al.  Ultrastable stimulus-response latencies: Acquisition and stimulus control , 1980, Perception & psychophysics.

[11]  S. Klein,et al.  Hyperacuity thresholds of 1 sec: theoretical predictions and empirical validation. , 1985, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[12]  Joan López-Moliner,et al.  Motion signal and the perceived positions of moving objects. , 2007, Journal of vision.

[13]  Jonathan W. Peirce,et al.  PsychoPy—Psychophysics software in Python , 2007, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[14]  V. Dreyer,et al.  Visual acuity. , 1974, Ophthalmologica. Journal international d'ophtalmologie. International journal of ophthalmology. Zeitschrift fur Augenheilkunde.

[15]  Eli Brenner,et al.  The role of uncertainty in the systematic spatial mislocalization of moving objects. , 2006, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[16]  Apostolos P. Georgopoulos,et al.  Intercepting real and path-guided apparent motion targets , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[17]  M. Chappell,et al.  Is there an auditory−visual flash‐lag effect? , 2003, Clinical & experimental ophthalmology.

[18]  T. Radil,et al.  Selective directional sensitivity in visual motion perception , 1991, Vision Research.

[19]  I. Murakami,et al.  The flash-lag effect as a spatiotemporal correlation structure. , 2001, Journal of vision.

[20]  G. Recanzone Auditory influences on visual temporal rate perception. , 2003, Journal of neurophysiology.

[21]  P. Cavanagh,et al.  Independent, synchronous access to color and motion features , 2008, Cognition.

[22]  Waka Fujisaki,et al.  Temporal frequency characteristics of synchrony–asynchrony discrimination of audio-visual signals , 2005, Experimental Brain Research.

[23]  D. Amnon Silverstein,et al.  Vernier acuity during image rotation and translation: Visual performance limits , 1995, Vision Research.

[24]  H E Bedell,et al.  Elevation of Vernier thresholds during image motion depends on target configuration. , 2000, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[25]  Romi Nijhawan,et al.  Behavioral significance of motion direction causes anisotropic flash-lag, flash-drag, flash-repulsion, and movement-mislocalization effects. , 2008, Journal of vision.

[26]  N. Kanwisher,et al.  Temporal Selection is Suppressed, Delayed, and Diffused During the Attentional Blink , 2008, Psychological science.

[27]  David Whitney,et al.  Motion distorts visual space: shifting the perceived position of remote stationary objects , 2000, Nature Neuroscience.

[28]  B. Repp Sensorimotor synchronization: A review of the tapping literature , 2005, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[29]  Derek H. Arnold,et al.  Simple differential latencies modulate, but do not cause the flash-lag effect. , 2009, Journal of vision.

[30]  Trevor J. Hine,et al.  Attention ‘capture’ by the flash-lag flash , 2006, Vision Research.

[31]  T J Sejnowski,et al.  Motion integration and postdiction in visual awareness. , 2000, Science.

[32]  Patrick Cavanagh,et al.  Early binding of feature pairs for visual perception , 2001, Nature Neuroscience.

[33]  Daniel Linares,et al.  Position perception: influence of motion with displacement dissociated from the influence of motion alone. , 2008, Journal of neurophysiology.

[34]  Eli Brenner,et al.  If I saw it, it probably wasn't far from where I was looking. , 2008, Journal of vision.

[35]  G Aschersleben,et al.  Synchronizing actions with events: The role of sensory information , 1995, Perception & psychophysics.

[36]  S. McKee,et al.  Visual acuity in the presence of retinal-image motion. , 1975, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[37]  D M Wolpert,et al.  Sensorimotor integration compensates for visual localization errors during smooth pursuit eye movements. , 2001, Journal of neurophysiology.

[38]  A. Holcombe Seeing slow and seeing fast: two limits on perception , 2009, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[39]  Joan López-Moliner,et al.  The flash-lag effect is reduced when the flash is perceived as a sensory consequence of our action , 2006, Vision Research.

[40]  Gopathy Purushothaman,et al.  Moving ahead through differential visual latency , 1998, Nature.

[41]  Ryota Kanai,et al.  Stopping the motion and sleuthing the flash-lag effect: spatial uncertainty is the key to perceptual mislocalization , 2004, Vision Research.

[42]  P. McLeod,et al.  Timing accuracy and decision time in high-speed ball games. , 1991 .

[43]  S. Mateeff,et al.  Perceptual latencies are shorter for motion towards the fovea than for motion away , 1988, Vision Research.

[44]  Romi Nijhawan,et al.  Motion extrapolation in catching , 1994, Nature.

[45]  W. Bialek,et al.  A sensory source for motor variation , 2005, Nature.

[46]  Alex L. White,et al.  Visuomotor timing compensates for changes in perceptual latency , 2008, Current Biology.

[47]  P Cavanagh,et al.  The Position of Moving Objects , 2000, Science.

[48]  S. Nishida,et al.  Marker Correspondence, Not Processing Latency, Determines Temporal Binding of Visual Attributes , 2002, Current Biology.

[49]  Terrence J Sejnowski,et al.  Motion signals bias localization judgments: a unified explanation for the flash-lag, flash-drag, flash-jump, and Frohlich illusions. , 2007, Journal of vision.

[50]  D. Burr,et al.  Contrast sensitivity at high velocities , 1982, Vision Research.

[51]  Andrew D. Straw,et al.  Vision Egg: an Open-Source Library for Realtime Visual Stimulus Generation , 2008, Frontiers Neuroinformatics.

[52]  D M Levi Pattern perception at high velocities , 1996, Current Biology.

[53]  P. Cavanagh,et al.  Illusory spatial offset of a flash relative to a moving stimulus is caused by differential latencies for moving and flashed stimuli , 2000, Vision Research.

[54]  Hugh R. Wilson,et al.  Responses of spatial mechanisms can explain hyperacuity , 1986, Vision Research.

[55]  Nancy Kanwisher,et al.  Delay of selective attention during the attentional blink , 2010 .

[56]  S. R. Jammalamadaka,et al.  Topics in Circular Statistics , 2001 .

[57]  P. Cavanagh,et al.  Bi-directional illusory position shifts toward the end point of apparent motion , 2006, Vision Research.

[58]  I. Murakami,et al.  A flash-lag effect in random motion , 2001, Vision Research.

[59]  Harold E. Bedell,et al.  Vernier in Motion: What Accounts for the Threshold Elevation? , 1996, Vision Research.

[60]  David Whitney,et al.  Temporal facilitation for moving stimuli is independent of changes in direction , 2000, Vision Research.