Exploring NK Fitness Landscapes Using an Imitative Learning Search

The idea that a group of cooperating agents can solve problems more efficiently than when those agents work independently is hardly controversial, despite the little quantitative groundwork to support it. Here we investigate the performance of a group of agents in locating the global maxima of NK fitness landscapes with varying degrees of ruggedness. Cooperation is taken into account through imitative learning and the broadcasting of messages informing on the fitness of each agent. We find a trade-off between the group size and the frequency of imitation: for rugged landscapes, too much imitation or too large a group yield a performance poorer than that of independent agents. By decreasing the diversity of the group, imitative learning may lead to duplication of work and hence to a decrease of its effective size. However, when the parameters are set to optimal values the cooperative group substantially outperforms the independent agents.

[1]  Robin I. M. Dunbar Neocortex size as a constraint on group size in primates , 1992 .

[2]  E. D. Weinberger,et al.  The NK model of rugged fitness landscapes and its application to maturation of the immune response. , 1989, Journal of theoretical biology.

[3]  Bernardo A. Huberman,et al.  The performance of cooperative processes , 1990 .

[4]  Daniel Solow,et al.  On the Expected Performance of Systems with Complex Interactions Among Components , 2000, Complex Syst..

[5]  M. Midgley Sociobiology. , 1984, Journal of medical ethics.

[6]  Andrew Whiten,et al.  The human socio-cognitive niche and its evolutionary origins , 2012, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[7]  José F. Fontanari,et al.  Imitative Learning as a Connector of Collective Brains , 2014, PloS one.

[8]  Claudia Fichtel,et al.  Social networks in primates: smart and tolerant species have more efficient networks , 2014, Scientific Reports.

[9]  Scott E. Page,et al.  Problem Solving by Heterogeneous Agents , 2001, J. Econ. Theory.

[10]  José F. Fontanari,et al.  The media effect in Axelrod's model explained , 2011, ArXiv.

[11]  B A Huberman,et al.  Cooperative Solution of Constraint Satisfaction Problems , 1991, Science.

[12]  James Kennedy,et al.  Minds and Cultures: Particle Swarm Implications For Beings in Sociocognitive Space , 1999, Adapt. Behav..

[13]  S. Kauffman,et al.  Towards a general theory of adaptive walks on rugged landscapes. , 1987, Journal of theoretical biology.

[14]  R. Axelrod The Dissemination of Culture , 1997 .

[15]  José F. Fontanari Social interaction as a heuristic for combinatorial optimization problems , 2010, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[16]  J. Fontanari,et al.  Evolutionary dynamics on rugged fitness landscapes: exact dynamics and information theoretical aspects. , 2009, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[17]  Yasufumi Shibanai,et al.  Effects of Global Information Feedback on Diversity , 2001 .

[18]  B. Derrida Random-energy model: An exactly solvable model of disordered systems , 1981 .

[19]  Steven Watts,et al.  The People's Tycoon: Henry Ford and the American Century , 2005 .

[20]  Marco Dorigo,et al.  Swarm intelligence: from natural to artificial systems , 1999 .

[21]  J. Kennedy Thinking is Social , 1998 .

[22]  David S. Johnson,et al.  Computers and Intractability: A Guide to the Theory of NP-Completeness , 1978 .