PURPOSE
To prospectively compare two-dimensional (2D) time-of-flight cerebral magnetic resonance (MR) venography with gadolinium-enhanced three-dimensional (3D) gradient-echo cerebral MR venography in children.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
This investigation had investigational review board approval and was Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act compliant; parental informed consent was obtained. Thirty-seven patients (20 boys, 17 girls) who ranged in age from 4 days to 15 years underwent 2D and 3D MR venography. Two pediatric neuroradiologists compared the visibility of the superior sagittal, straight, transverse, and sigmoid sinuses and the internal jugular veins on images obtained with the two sequences.
RESULTS
In 17 (46%) of the 37 patients, the sequences were equivalent in terms of their depiction of venous anatomy. In 19 (51%) of the 37 patients, 3D MR venography was superior to 2D MR venography. Suboptimal enhancement of veins occurred in one (3%) patient at 3D MR venography. Venous anomalies suggested at 2D MR venography but not present at 3D MR venography included flow gaps in the nondominant transverse sinuses of four patients, unilateral transverse sinus atresia in eight, and a narrowed superior sagittal sinus in two. Two-dimensional MR venography results failed to reveal a persistent falcine sinus associated with straight sinus atresia in one patient and suggested transverse sinus thrombosis in two patients in whom 3D MR venography results were normal. Additionally, the extent of dural thrombosis was overestimated at 2D MR venography in one patient. As compared with 3D MR venography, 2D MR venography failed to reveal sigmoid sinus stenosis in one patient and poorly depicted posterior fossa dural sinus anatomy in two patients with dural arteriovenous fistula.
CONCLUSION
Three-dimensional MR venography is often superior to 2D MR venography in the delineation of major cerebral venous structures in children. Most of the artifactual loss of vascular signal seen with the use of 2D MR venography occurred in nondominant transverse sinuses.
[1]
M. R. Theobald,et al.
Cerebral MR venography: normal anatomy and potential diagnostic pitfalls.
,
2000,
AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.
[2]
M. Kitajima,et al.
Evaluation of the intracranial dural sinuses with a 3D contrast-enhanced MP-RAGE sequence: prospective comparison with 2D-TOF MR venography and digital subtraction angiography.
,
2001,
AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.
[3]
J. Chia,et al.
MR venography in the pediatric patient.
,
2005,
AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.
[4]
D J Mikulis,et al.
Idiopathic intracranial hypertension
,
2003,
Neurology.
[5]
M. van Buchem,et al.
MR angiography of the intracranial venous system.
,
2000,
Radiology.
[6]
Graham A Wright,et al.
Intracranial venous system: gadolinium-enhanced three-dimensional MR venography with auto-triggered elliptic centric-ordered sequence--initial experience.
,
2003,
Radiology.
[7]
Y. Shigematsu,et al.
Normal structures in the intracranial dural sinuses: delineation with 3D contrast-enhanced magnetization prepared rapid acquisition gradient-echo imaging sequence.
,
2002,
AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.
[8]
T L Chenevert,et al.
The effects of time varying intravascular signal intensity and k‐space acquisition order on three‐dimensional MR angiography image quality
,
1996,
Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.
[9]
R R Edelman,et al.
Cerebral venography with MR.
,
1991,
Radiology.