R&D, Marketing, and the Success of Next-Generation Products

This paper studies dynamic competition in markets characterized by the introduction of technologically advanced next-generation products. Firms invest in new product effort in an attempt to attain industry leadership, thus securing high profits and benefiting from advantages relevant for the success of future product generations. The analysis reveals that when the current leader possesses higher research and development (R&D) competence, it tends to investmore in R&D than rivals and to retain its lead position. The leader's investment exhibits an inverse-U pattern as this advantage increases. In contrast, when the leader enjoys an advantage that originates from the persistence of reputation, it investsless than its followers. Now, followers' investment exhibits an inverse-U pattern as reputation advantage increases. Depending on the extent of leader reputation, industry structure can either exhibit frequent leadership shifts or prolonged incumbent dominance. The basic framework is extended to allow investments in additional marketing variables (e.g., advertising). Interestingly, the leader takes advantage of strong demand for its current product by focusing more on advertising, whereas the follower expends more on R&D. By shedding light on the implications of industry position for investment incentives and market evolution, the analysis provides valuable insights for formulating marketing strategy in fast-paced, high-tech business environments.

[1]  Kelly D. Edmiston,et al.  Incentive Targeting, Influence Peddling, and Foreign Direct Investment , 2004 .

[2]  Dale A. Stirling,et al.  Information rules , 2003, SGMD.

[3]  Rohit Deshpandé,et al.  Sony PlayStation2 (A) , 2001 .

[4]  R. Chandy,et al.  The Incumbent's Curse? Incumbency, Size, and Radical Product Innovation , 2000 .

[5]  S. Dutta,et al.  Success in High-Technology Markets: is Marketing Capability Critical? , 1999 .

[6]  John R. Hauser,et al.  Research, development, and engineering metrics , 1998 .

[7]  D. Teece.  Capturing Value from Knowledge Assets: The New Economy, Markets for Know-How, and Intangible Assets , 1998 .

[8]  D. Teece,et al.  DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES AND STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT , 1997 .

[9]  W. Arthur,et al.  Increasing returns and the new world of business. , 1996, Harvard business review.

[10]  Michael S. Malone,et al.  The microprocessor - a biography , 1995 .

[11]  I. Cockburn,et al.  Measuring competence?: exploring firm effects in pharmaceutical research , 1994 .

[12]  Devavrat Purohit,et al.  What Should You Do When Your Competitors Send in the Clones , 1994 .

[13]  G. Day.  The Capabilities of Market-Driven Organizations , 1994 .

[14]  V. Srinivasan,et al.  A Survey-Based Method for Measuring and Understanding Brand Equity and Its Extendibility , 1994 .

[15]  J. Vickers,et al.  A Model of the Evolution of Duopoly: Does the Asymmetry between Firms Tend to Increase or Decrease? , 1993 .

[16]  J. M. Villas-Boas.  Predicting Advertising Pulsing Policies in an Oligopoly: A Model and Empirical Test , 1993 .

[17]  M. Hirschey,et al.  Advertising, R&D Expenditures and the Market Value of the Firm , 1993 .

[18]  J. M. Villas-Boas.  Dynamic duopolies with non-convex adjustment costs , 1992 .

[19]  R. Nelson.  Why do firms differ, and how does it matter? , 1991 .

[20]  P. Ghemawat.  Market Incumbency and Technological Inertia , 1991 .

[21]  Kevin Lane Keller,et al.  Consumer Evaluations of Brand Extensions , 1990 .

[22]  Elhanan Helpman,et al.  Quality Ladders and Product Cycles , 1989 .

[23]  W. Mitchell.  Whether and When? Probability and Timing of Incumbents' Entry into Emerging Industrial Subfields , 1989 .

[24]  Richard R. Nelson,et al.  Appropriating the Returns from Industrial R&D , 1988 .

[25]  John Vickers,et al.  The Evolution of Market Structure When There Is a Sequence of Innovations , 1986 .

[26]  Jennifer F. Reinganum.  Innovation and Industry Evolution , 1985 .

[27]  B. Wernerfelt,et al.  A Resource-Based View of the Firm , 1984 .

[28]  Henry G. Grabowski,et al.  The Determinants of Industrial Research and Development: A Study of the Chemical, Drug, and Petroleum Industries , 1968, Journal of Political Economy.

[29]  J. Schumpeter.  Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy , 1943 .

[30]  A. Pakes,et al.  Markov-Perfect Industry Dynamics: A Framework for Empirical Work , 1995 .

[31]  Rebecca Henderson,et al.  Managing innovation in the information age , 1994 .

[32]  Jennifer F. Reinganum.  The timing of innovation: Research, development, and diffusion , 1989 .

[33]  G. Dosi.  Sources, Procedures, and Microeconomic Effects of Innovation , 1988 .

[34]  S. Winter,et al.  Appropriating the Returns from Industrial Research and Development , 1987 .

[35]  Partha Dasgupta,et al.  The Theory of Technological Competition , 1986 .

[36]  W. Rogerson.  The social costs of monopoly and regulation : a game theoretic analysis , 1982 .

[37]  D. Newbery,et al.  Preemptive Patenting and the Persistence of Monopoly , 1982 .