Information loss and reconstruction in diffuse fluorescence tomography.

This paper is a theoretical exploration of spatial resolution in diffuse fluorescence tomography. It is demonstrated that, given a fixed imaging geometry, one cannot-relative to standard techniques such as Tikhonov regularization and truncated singular value decomposition-improve the spatial resolution of the optical reconstructions via increasing the node density of the mesh considered for modeling light transport. Using techniques from linear algebra, it is shown that, as one increases the number of nodes beyond the number of measurements, information is lost by the forward model. It is demonstrated that this information cannot be recovered using various common reconstruction techniques. Evidence is provided showing that this phenomenon is related to the smoothing properties of the elliptic forward model that is used in the diffusion approximation to light transport in tissue. This argues for reconstruction techniques that are sensitive to boundaries, such as L1-reconstruction and the use of priors, as well as the natural approach of building a measurement geometry that reflects the desired image resolution.

[1]  R. Weissleder,et al.  Fluorescence molecular tomography resolves protease activity in vivo , 2002, Nature Medicine.

[2]  C. Contag,et al.  Advances in in vivo bioluminescence imaging of gene expression. , 2002, Annual review of biomedical engineering.

[3]  Scott C Davis,et al.  Pre-clinical whole-body fluorescence imaging: Review of instruments, methods and applications. , 2010, Journal of photochemistry and photobiology. B, Biology.

[4]  Hamid Dehghani,et al.  Early-photon fluorescence tomography: spatial resolution improvements and noise stability considerations. , 2009, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[5]  Scott C. Davis,et al.  Preclinical Whole-body Fluorescence Imaging: Review of Instruments, Methods and Applications , 2013 .

[6]  H Dehghani,et al.  A three-dimensional finite element model and image reconstruction algorithm for time-domain fluorescence imaging in highly scattering media , 2011, Physics in medicine and biology.

[7]  S. Arridge,et al.  Optical imaging in medicine: II. Modelling and reconstruction , 1997, Physics in medicine and biology.

[8]  M S Patterson,et al.  Imaging of fluorescent yield and lifetime from multiply scattered light reemitted from random media. , 1997, Applied optics.

[9]  C. Contag,et al.  It's not just about anatomy: In vivo bioluminescence imaging as an eyepiece into biology , 2002, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[10]  P. Hansen.  Discrete Inverse Problems: Insight and Algorithms , 2010 .

[11]  Albert Cerussi,et al.  Noninvasive functional optical spectroscopy of human breast tissue , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[12]  Hamid Dehghani,et al.  Critical computational aspects of near infrared circular tomographic imaging: Analysis of measurement number, mesh resolution and reconstruction basis. , 2006, Optics express.

[13]  M. Schweiger,et al.  A finite element approach for modeling photon transport in tissue. , 1993, Medical physics.

[14]  J P Culver,et al.  Optimization of optode arrangements for diffuse optical tomography: A singular-value analysis. , 2001, Optics letters.

[15]  Hamid Dehghani,et al.  Near infrared optical tomography using NIRFAST: Algorithm for numerical model and image reconstruction. , 2009, Communications in numerical methods in engineering.

[16]  Xavier Intes,et al.  Time-resolved diffuse optical tomography with patterned-light illumination and detection. , 2010, Optics letters.

[17]  Brian W. Pogue,et al.  Singular value decomposition metrics show limitations of detector design in diffuse fluorescence tomography , 2010, Biomedical optics express.

[18]  R A Groenhuis,et al.  Scattering and absorption of turbid materials determined from reflection measurements. 2: measuring method and calibration. , 1983, Applied optics.

[19]  Vadim A. Markel,et al.  Imaging complex structures with diffuse light. , 2008, Optics express.

[20]  H. A. Ferwerda,et al.  Scattering and absorption of turbid materials determined from reflection measurements. 1: theory. , 1983, Applied optics.

[21]  Quan Zhang,et al.  Coregistered tomographic x-ray and optical breast imaging: initial results. , 2005, Journal of biomedical optics.

[22]  Vadim A. Markel,et al.  Experimental demonstration of an analytic method for image reconstruction in optical diffusion tomography with large data sets. , 2005, Optics letters.

[23]  S. Arridge.  Optical tomography in medical imaging , 1999 .

[24]  Brian W. Pogue,et al.  Imaging workflow and calibration for CT-guided time-domain fluorescence tomography , 2011, Biomedical optics express.

[25]  K. Paulsen,et al.  Spatially varying optical property reconstruction using a finite element diffusion equation approximation. , 1995, Medical physics.

[26]  B. Pogue,et al.  Spectrally resolved bioluminescence optical tomography. , 2006, Optics letters.

[27]  B. Pogue,et al.  Quantitative hemoglobin tomography with diffuse near-infrared spectroscopy: pilot results in the breast. , 2001, Radiology.

[28]  B. Pogue,et al.  Tutorial on diffuse light transport. , 2008, Journal of biomedical optics.

[29]  D. Delpy,et al.  Optical Imaging in Medicine , 1998, CLEO/Europe Conference on Lasers and Electro-Optics.

[30]  S. Arridge,et al.  Nonuniqueness in diffusion-based optical tomography. , 1998, Optics letters.

[31]  Brian W Pogue,et al.  Toward whole-body optical imaging of rats using single-photon counting fluorescence tomography. , 2011, Optics letters.

[32]  Hamid Dehghani,et al.  A microcomputed tomography guided fluorescence tomography system for small animal molecular imaging. , 2009, The Review of scientific instruments.