Communication interventions to promote vaccination uptake: A systematic review protocol.

ABSTRACT Background: The use of communication interventions to promote vaccination has been more frequent in this century. These types of interventions have proven to be effective in reaching the majority of the population. Knowing the characteristics and results of communication interventions to foster vaccine uptake is important, especially with the outbreak of new infectious diseases such as the novel coronavirus (SARS CoV-2). This protocol will guide the development of a systematic review of the literature aiming to identify and analyze the evidence of communication interventions to incentivize vaccine uptake among populations living in low and middle-income countries (LMICs). Methods: This systematic review protocol is guided by the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis Protocols (PRISMA-P). The searches for the systematic review will be carried out through five electronic databases PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Redalyc and PyscInfo. Two individuals will review each paper individually and in parallel using the software Rayyan. Duplicate elimination, title and abstract screening, and full text screening will be performed by the two reviewers. A matrix constructed in Excel will be used to extract data and to review the quality of the studies Quality assessment will be conducted using the QATSDD Critical Appraisal Tool. Discussion: The results of this systematic review will contribute to the public health literature in the area of behavior change communication in general, and vaccination communication in particular. Findings from this study would also inform the development of communication interventions to improve vaccination uptake in LMICs. Systematic review registration: PROSPERO CRD42022355541 Keywords: Vaccination, communication, behavior change, systematic review

[1]  D. Walteros,et al.  COVID-19 más allá de los casos y atenciones. Una aproximación a la desigualdad en el acceso al diagnóstico en Bogotá, 2020 , 2022, Gerencia y Políticas de Salud.

[2]  Carlos Castañeda Orjuela,et al.  El desinterés en recibir la vacuna contra el coronavirus en población de 23 ciudades colombianas, julio a diciembre de 2020 , 2022, Gerencia y Políticas de Salud.

[3]  S. Rutherford,et al.  COVID-19 Vaccine Uptake among Younger Women in Rural Australia , 2021, Vaccines.

[4]  S. Akhter,et al.  A cost study for mobile phone health surveys using interactive voice response for assessing risk factors of noncommunicable diseases , 2021, Population Health Metrics.

[5]  Angelo Fernando Robledo-Colonia,et al.  Infodemia: noticias falsas y tendencias de mortalidad por COVID-19 en seis países de América Latina , 2021, Revista panamericana de salud publica = Pan American journal of public health.

[6]  C. Armitage,et al.  A Rapid Systematic Review of Public Responses to Health Messages Encouraging Vaccination against Infectious Diseases in a Pandemic or Epidemic , 2020, Vaccines.

[7]  N. Alvis-Guzmán,et al.  Is Colombia an example of successful containment of the 2020 COVID-19 pandemic? A critical analysis of the epidemiological data, March to July 2020 , 2020, International Journal of Infectious Diseases.

[8]  J. Miranda,et al.  Social marketing interventions for the prevention and control of neglected tropical diseases: A systematic review , 2020, PLoS neglected tropical diseases.

[9]  K. Kim,et al.  What Is COVID-19? , 2020, Frontiers for Young Minds.

[10]  Jean-Martin Bauer,et al.  Strengths and limitations of computer assisted telephone interviews (CATI) for nutrition data collection in rural Kenya , 2019, PloS one.

[11]  O. Mújica,et al.  EQUIDAD EN SALUD PARA EL DESARROLLO SOSTENIBLE , 2016 .

[12]  Heidi Lauckner,et al.  The QATSDD critical appraisal tool: comments and critiques. , 2015, Journal of evaluation in clinical practice.

[13]  P. Shekelle,et al.  Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation , 2015, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[14]  R. Lawton,et al.  Reviewing studies with diverse designs: the development and evaluation of a new tool. , 2012, Journal of evaluation in clinical practice.

[15]  Sanjiv Kumar,et al.  Health Promotion: An Effective Tool for Global Health , 2012, Indian journal of community medicine : official publication of Indian Association of Preventive & Social Medicine.