A systemic framework for sustainability assessment

Sustainability assessment (SA) is a complex appraisal method. It is conducted for supporting decision-making and policy in a broad environmental, economic and social context, and transcends a purely technical/scientific evaluation. This paper focusses on the systematisation of knowledge on technical/scientific sustainability evaluation, by addressing critical decision-making elements focussed on by domain experts. We make a distinction between integrated assessment and SA. Our systemic approach outlines how to move from integrated assessment to SA. The fundamental differences involved concern three levels: ontological, methodological and epistemological. We present a novel methodological framework for SA, based on a literature meta-review of multi-scale and multi-purpose appraisal methodologies, models and indicators. SA is essentially a structured procedure encompassing different field-specific analytical methods and models, for specific applications and decision contexts. External inputs to the methodology are “values” considered in the analysis and boundaries defined, including the relevant sustainability framework. Internal methodological elements comprise approach to be adopted (e.g. “what-if” vs. “what-to”), scenario design and analytical models and measurable indicators for an operational analysis. Methods to quantify uncertainty are key ingredients of the assessment framework. The paper highlights the relevance of and policy challenges for SA development, with due attention for applicability in real-world decision contexts.

[1]  Robert Ries,et al.  Environmental decision making in multi-stakeholder contexts: applicability of life cycle thinking in development planning and implementation , 2009 .

[2]  F. Chapin,et al.  Planetary boundaries: Exploring the safe operating space for humanity , 2009 .

[3]  Alexandros Gasparatos,et al.  Embedded value systems in sustainability assessment tools and their implications. , 2010, Journal of environmental management.

[4]  Göran Finnveden,et al.  Environmental systems analysis tools – an overview , 2005 .

[5]  W. Clark,et al.  Sustainability science: The emerging research program , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[6]  Tarantola Stefano,et al.  Uncertainty in Industrial Practice - A Guide to Quantitative Uncertainty Management , 2008 .

[7]  Saurabh Gupta,et al.  An overview of sustainability assessment methodologies , 2009 .

[8]  K. Takeuchi,et al.  Sustainability science: building a new discipline , 2006 .

[9]  Christoph Böhringer Measuring the Immeasurable: A Survey of Sustainability Indices , 2006 .

[10]  Lennart Olsson,et al.  Categorising tools for sustainability assessment , 2007 .

[11]  William E. Rees,et al.  Interregional sustainability: governance and policy in an ecologically interdependent world , 2011 .

[12]  Katsuyuki Nakano,et al.  Collaborative activity with business partners for improvement of product environmental performance using LCA , 2011 .

[13]  S. Carpenter,et al.  Decision-making under great uncertainty: environmental management in an era of global change. , 2011, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[14]  R. Kasperson,et al.  Sustainability Science , 2019, Critical Skills for Environmental Professionals.

[15]  Gilberto C. Gallopín,et al.  Science and technology, sustainability and sustainable development , 2001 .

[16]  Adisa Azapagic,et al.  Options for broadening and deepening the LCA approaches , 2010 .

[17]  Angus Morrison-Saunders,et al.  Conceptualising sustainability assessment , 2004 .

[18]  Alessandra Zamagni,et al.  Progress in sustainability science: lessons learnt from current methodologies for sustainability assessment: Part 1 , 2013, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[19]  S. Schwartzman,et al.  The New Production of Knowledge: The Dynamics of Science and Research in Contemporary Societies , 1994 .

[20]  Christoph Böhringer,et al.  Measuring the Immeasurable: A Survey of Sustainability Indices , 2007 .

[21]  Saltelli Andrea,et al.  Global Sensitivity Analysis: The Primer , 2008 .

[22]  Peter Nijkamp,et al.  Ceteris paribus, spatial complexity and spatial equilibrium: An interpretative perspective , 2007 .

[23]  Serenella Sala,et al.  Sustainable performance index for tourism policy development , 2010 .

[24]  Xiaobo Zhou,et al.  Global Sensitivity Analysis , 2017, Encyclopedia of GIS.

[25]  F. Pappenberger,et al.  Ignorance is bliss: Or seven reasons not to use uncertainty analysis , 2006 .

[26]  L. Hens,et al.  How Green Is the City?: Sustainability Assessment and the Management of Urban Environments , 2001 .

[27]  David F. Channell Pasteur's Quadrant: Basic Science and Technological Innovation , 1999 .

[28]  Andrew D.F. Price,et al.  Conceptualizing stakeholder engagement in the context of sustainability and its assessment , 2008 .

[29]  Serenella Sala,et al.  Research findings and decision making: the case of renewable energy , 2013, Environmental Sciences Europe.

[30]  Fabio Boschetti,et al.  A graphical representation of uncertainty in complex decision making , 2011 .

[31]  L. Osorio,et al.  An epistemology for sustainability science: a proposal for the study of the health/disease phenomenon , 2009 .

[32]  R. Kasperson,et al.  A framework for vulnerability analysis in sustainability science , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[33]  Serenella Sala,et al.  Technology Sustainability Assessment To Support Decision Making On Energy Production At Local Scale , 2011 .

[34]  Alan Bond,et al.  Learning How to Deal with Values, Frames and Governance in Sustainability Appraisal , 2011 .

[35]  V. Castellani,et al.  Ecological Footprint and Life Cycle Assessment in the sustainability assessment of tourism activities , 2012 .

[36]  M. El-Haram,et al.  A critical review of reductionist approaches for assessing the progress towards sustainability , 2008 .

[37]  S. Funtowicz,et al.  Science for the Post-Normal Age , 1993, Commonplace.

[38]  Pim Martens,et al.  Transdisciplinary research in sustainability science: practice, principles, and challenges , 2012, Sustainability Science.

[39]  Arnim Wiek,et al.  From complex systems analysis to transformational change: a comparative appraisal of sustainability science projects , 2012, Sustainability Science.

[40]  G. Brundtland,et al.  Our common future , 1987 .

[41]  Jenny Pope EDITORIAL: WHAT'S SO SPECIAL ABOUT SUSTAINABILITY ASSESSMENT? , 2006 .

[42]  Michael H. Huesemann,et al.  The inherent biases in environmental research and their effects on public policy , 2002 .

[43]  Audrey L Mayer,et al.  Strengths and weaknesses of common sustainability indices for multidimensional systems. , 2008, Environment international.

[44]  Arnim Wiek,et al.  Sustainability science: bridging the gap between science and society , 2012, Sustainability Science.

[45]  Angus Morrison-Saunders,et al.  Applying sustainability assessment models , 2005 .

[46]  Margni Manuele,et al.  Recommendations for Life Cycle Impact Assessment in the European context - based on existing environmental impact assessment models and factors (International Reference Life Cycle Data System - ILCD handbook) , 2011 .

[47]  Peter Guthrie,et al.  A framework for clarifying the meaning of Triple Bottom-Line, Integrated, and Sustainability Assessment , 2008 .

[48]  Maite Cabeza Gutés The concept of weak sustainability , 1996 .

[49]  Thomas Jahn,et al.  Transdisciplinarity in the Practice of Research , 2008 .

[50]  László Pintér,et al.  Bellagio STAMP: Principles for sustainability assessment and measurement , 2012 .

[51]  F. Wickson,et al.  Transdisciplinary research: characteristics, quandaries and quality , 2006 .