Overlap bias in the case‐crossover design, with application to air pollution exposures

The case-crossover design uses cases only, and compares exposures just prior to the event times to exposures at comparable control, or 'referent' times, in order to assess the effect of short-term exposure on the risk of a rare event. It has commonly been used to study the effect of air pollution on the risk of various adverse health events. Proper selection of referents is crucial, especially with air pollution exposures, which are shared, highly seasonal, and often have a long-term time trend. Hence, careful referent selection is important to control for time-varying confounders, and in order to ensure that the distribution of exposure is constant across referent times, a key assumption of this method. Yet the referent strategy is important for a more basic reason: the conditional logistic regression estimating equations commonly used are biased when referents are not chosen a priori and are functions of the observed event times. We call this bias in the estimating equations overlap bias. In this paper, we propose a new taxonomy of referent selection strategies in order to emphasize their statistical properties. We give a derivation of overlap bias, explore its magnitude, and consider how the bias depends on properties of the exposure series. We conclude that the bias is usually small, though highly unpredictable, and easily avoided.

[1]  K. Rothman,et al.  Bias arising in case-control studies from selection of controls from overlapping groups. , 1989, International journal of epidemiology.

[2]  G. Pershagen,et al.  Effects of Ambient Air Pollution on Daily Mortality in a Cohort of Patients with Congestive Heart Failure , 2001, Epidemiology.

[3]  Thomas Lumley,et al.  Bias in the case – crossover design: implications for studies of air pollution , 2000 .

[4]  J. Robins,et al.  The Validity of Case'Control Studies with Nonrandom Selection of Controls , 1990, Epidemiology.

[5]  M. Maclure The case-crossover design: a method for studying transient effects on the risk of acute events. , 1991, American journal of epidemiology.

[6]  S Greenland,et al.  Confounding and Exposure Trends in Case‐Crossover and Case‐Time‐Control Designs , 1996, Epidemiology.

[7]  M. Clyde,et al.  Health Effects of Air Pollution: A Statistical Review , 2003 .

[8]  J. Schwartz,et al.  Reanalysis of the effects of air pollution on daily mortality in Seoul, Korea: A case-crossover design. , 1999, Environmental health perspectives.

[9]  D. Dockery,et al.  A case-crossover analysis of air pollution and mortality in Philadelphia. , 1999, Environmental health perspectives.

[10]  J. Schwartz,et al.  Patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease are at increased risk of death associated with urban particle air pollution: a case-crossover analysis. , 2000, American journal of epidemiology.

[11]  H Checkoway,et al.  A Case-Crossover Analysis of Particulate Matter Air Pollution and Out-of-Hospital Primary Cardiac Arrest , 2001, Epidemiology.

[12]  William Navidi,et al.  Risk Set Sampling for Case-Crossover Designs , 2002, Epidemiology.

[13]  T. Bateson,et al.  Control for seasonal variation and time trend in case-crossover studies of acute effects of environmental exposures. , 1999, Epidemiology.

[14]  T. Bateson,et al.  Selection Bias and Confounding in Case-Crossover Analyses of Environmental Time-Series Data , 2001, Epidemiology.

[15]  W. Navidi,et al.  Bidirectional case-crossover designs for exposures with time trends. , 1998, Biometrics.

[16]  D. Dockery,et al.  Increased Particulate Air Pollution and the Triggering of Myocardial Infarction , 2001, Circulation.