Time-varying magnetotail magnetic flux calculation: a test of the method

Abstract. We modified the Petrinec and Russell (1996) algorithm to allow the computation of time-varying magnetotail magnetic flux based on simultaneous spacecraft measurements in the magnetotail and near-Earth solar wind. In view of many assumptions made we tested the algorithm against MHD simulation in the artificial event, which provides the input from two artificial spacecraft to compute the magnetic flux F values with our algorithm; the latter are compared with flux values, obtained by direct integration in the tail cross-section. The comparison shows similar time variations of predicted and simulated fluxes as well as their good correlation ( cc >0.9) for the input taken from the tail lobe, which somewhat degrades if using the "measurements" from the central plasma sheet. The regression relationship between the predicted and computed flux values is rather stable allowing one to correct the absolute value of predicted magnetic flux. We conclude that this method is a perspective tool to monitor the tail magnetic flux which is one of the main global magnetotail parameters.

[1]  J. Spann,et al.  Aurora and open magnetic flux during isolated substorms, sawteeth, and SMC events , 2007 .

[2]  W. Hughes,et al.  Finding the Lyon-Fedder-Mobarry magnetopause : A statistical perspective , 2007 .

[3]  Stephen E. Milan,et al.  Magnetic flux transport in the Dungey cycle: A survey of dayside and nightside reconnection rates , 2007 .

[4]  V. A. Sergeev,et al.  Quantitative magnetotail characteristics of different magnetospheric states , 2004 .

[5]  N. Tsyganenko,et al.  Global shape of the magnetotail current sheet as derived from Geotail and Polar data , 2004 .

[6]  T. Pulkkinen,et al.  Stormtime energy transfer in global MHD simulation , 2003 .

[7]  J. Raeder Global Magnetohydrodynamics — A Tutorial , 2003 .

[8]  N. Tsyganenko,et al.  A model of the near magnetosphere with a dawn-dusk asymmetry 1. Mathematical structure , 2002 .

[9]  C. Russell,et al.  Comparison of three magnetopause prediction models under extreme solar wind conditions , 2001 .

[10]  C. Meng,et al.  Polar Ultraviolet Imager observations of global auroral power as a function of polar cap size and magnetotail stretching , 2001 .

[11]  M. O. Fillingim,et al.  Polar cap area and boundary motion during substorms , 1999 .

[12]  T. Mukai,et al.  Substorm-associated pressure variations in the magnetotail plasma sheet and lobe , 1999 .

[13]  C. Russell,et al.  Magnetopause shape determinations from measured position and estimated flaring angle , 1999 .

[14]  Hideaki Kawano,et al.  Magnetopause location under extreme solar wind conditions , 1998 .

[15]  C. Russell,et al.  Electron temperature in the ambient solar wind: Typical properties and a lower bound at 1 AU , 1998 .

[16]  V. A. Sergeev,et al.  Steady magnetospheric convection: A review of recent results , 1996 .

[17]  C. Russell,et al.  Near-Earth magnetotail shape and size as determined from the magnetopause flaring angle , 1996 .

[18]  John D. Craven,et al.  Features of steady magnetospheric convection , 1994 .

[19]  Christopher T. Russell,et al.  Solar cycle variations in the size and shape of the magnetopause , 1991 .

[20]  Wolfgang Baumjohann,et al.  Pressure balance between lobe and plasma sheet , 1990 .

[21]  V. Sergeev,et al.  Rate of magnetic-flux accumulation in the magnetospheric tail , 1985 .

[22]  E. W. Hones,et al.  Simultaneous measurements of magnetotail dynamics by IMP spacecraft , 1980 .

[23]  K. Maezawa Magnetotail boundary motion associated with geomagnetic substorms , 1975 .

[24]  C. Russell,et al.  Solar wind and substorm‐related changes in the lobes of the geomagnetic tail , 1973 .

[25]  C. Russell,et al.  The magnetotail and substorms , 1973 .

[26]  A. Summers,et al.  Hydromagnetic flow around the magnetosphere , 1966 .