Chimpanzees Are Rational Maximizers in an Ultimatum Game

Traditional models of economic decision-making assume that people are self-interested rational maximizers. Empirical research has demonstrated, however, that people will take into account the interests of others and are sensitive to norms of cooperation and fairness. In one of the most robust tests of this finding, the ultimatum game, individuals will reject a proposed division of a monetary windfall, at a cost to themselves, if they perceive it as unfair. Here we show that in an ultimatum game, humans' closest living relatives, chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes), are rational maximizers and are not sensitive to fairness. These results support the hypothesis that other-regarding preferences and aversion to inequitable outcomes, which play key roles in human social organization, distinguish us from our closest living relatives.

[1]  W. Hamilton.  The genetical evolution of social behaviour. I. , 1964, Journal of theoretical biology.

[2]  R. Trivers.  The Evolution of Reciprocal Altruism , 1971, The Quarterly Review of Biology.

[3]  W. Güth,et al.  An experimental analysis of ultimatum bargaining , 1982 .

[4]  R. Frank.  If Homo Economicus Could Choose His Own Utility Function, Would He Want One with a Conscience? Reply , 1987 .

[5]  P. Richerson,et al.  The evolution of reciprocity in sizable groups. , 1988, Journal of theoretical biology.

[6]  G. Berntson,et al.  Numerical competence in a chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes). , 1989, Journal of comparative psychology.

[7]  M. Rabin.  Published by: American , 2022 .

[8]  Gary E. Bolton,et al.  Anonymity versus Punishment in Ultimatum Bargaining , 1995 .

[9]  Madan M. Pillutla,et al.  Unfairness, Anger, and Spite: Emotional Rejections of Ultimatum Offers , 1996 .

[10]  J. Keith Murnighan,et al.  Ultimatum bargaining by children and adults , 1998 .

[11]  E. Fehr,et al.  Reciprocity and economics: The economic implications of Homo Reciprocans 1 This paper is part of a r , 1998 .

[12]  Klaus M. Schmidt,et al.  A Theory of Fairness, Competition, and Cooperation , 1999 .

[13]  W. McGrew,et al.  Ethogram and Ethnography of Mahale Chimpanzees , 1999 .

[14]  H. Gintis.  Strong reciprocity and human sociality. , 2000, Journal of theoretical biology.

[15]  U. Fischbacher,et al.  On the Nature of Fair Behavior , 1999 .

[16]  D. Stephens,et al.  Food sharing: a model of manipulation by harassment , 2002 .

[17]  Colin Camerer.  Behavioral Game Theory: Experiments in Strategic Interaction , 2003 .

[18]  U. Fischbacher,et al.  The nature of human altruism , 2003, Nature.

[19]  R. Boyd,et al.  The evolution of altruistic punishment , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[20]  Toshio Yamagishi,et al.  False friends are worse than bitter enemies: “Altruistic” punishment of in-group members , 2004 .

[21]  宁北芳,et al.  疟原虫var基因转换速率变化导致抗原变异[英]／Paul H, Robert P, Christodoulou Z, et al//Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A , 2005 .

[22]  F. D. de Waal,et al.  Tolerance for inequity may increase with social closeness in chimpanzees , 2005, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[23]  D. Fessler,et al.  Nobody's watching? Subtle cues affect generosity in an anonymous economic game. , 2005 .

[24]  D. Povinelli,et al.  Chimpanzees are indifferent to the welfare of unrelated group members , 2005, Nature.

[25]  J. Henrich,et al.  Costly Punishment Across Human Societies , 2006, Science.

[26]  Armin Falk,et al.  A Theory of Reciprocity , 2001, Games Econ. Behav..

[27]  M. Tomasello,et al.  What's in it for me? Self-regard precludes altruism and spite in chimpanzees , 2006, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[28]  M. Tomasello,et al.  Engineering cooperation in chimpanzees: tolerance constraints on cooperation , 2006, Animal Behaviour.

[29]  M. Tomasello,et al.  Altruistic Helping in Human Infants and Young Chimpanzees , 2006, Science.

[30]  M. Tomasello,et al.  Are apes really inequity averse? , 2006, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[31]  J. Call,et al.  Discrete quantity judgments in the great apes (Pan paniscus, Pan troglodytes, Gorilla gorilla, Pongo pygmaeus): the effect of presenting whole sets versus item-by-item. , 2007, Journal of comparative psychology.

[32]  D. Baulcombe,et al.  Widespread Role for the Flowering-Time Regulators FCA and FPA in RNA-Mediated Chromatin Silencing , 2007, Science.

[33]  Michael Tomasello,et al.  Chimpanzees are vengeful but not spiteful , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[34]  M. Tomasello,et al.  Spontaneous Altruism by Chimpanzees and Young Children , 2007, PLoS biology.

[35]  R. Rosenfeld.  Nature , 2009, Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery.