A simple model can unify a broad range of phenomena in retinotectal map development

A paradigm model system for studying the development of patterned connections in the nervous system is the topographic map formed by retinal axons in the optic tectum/superior colliculus. Starting in the 1970s, a series of computational models have been proposed to explain map development in both normal conditions, and perturbed conditions where the retina and/or tectum/superior colliculus are altered. This stands in contrast to more recent models that have often been simpler than older ones, and tend to address more limited data sets, but include more recent genetic manipulations. The original exploration of many of the early models was one-dimensional and limited by the computational resources of the time. This leaves open the ability of these early models to explain both map development in two dimensions, and the genetic manipulation data that have only appeared more recently. In this article, we show that a two-dimensional and updated version of the XBAM model (eXtended Branch Arrow Model), first proposed in 1982, reproduces a range of surgical map manipulations not yet demonstrated by more modern models. A systematic exploration of the parameter space of this model in two dimensions also reveals richer behavior than that apparent from the original one-dimensional versions. Furthermore, we show that including a specific type of axon–axon interaction can account for the map collapse recently observed when particular receptor levels are genetically manipulated in a subset of retinal ganglion cells. Together these results demonstrate that balancing multiple influences on map development seems to be necessary to explain many biological phenomena in retinotectal map formation, and suggest important constraints on the underlying biological variables.

[1]  E. Debski,et al.  Activity-dependent mapping in the retinotectal projection , 2002, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[2]  C A Stuermer,et al.  Trajectories of regenerating retinal axons in the goldfish tectum: II. Exploratory branches and growth cones on axons at early regeneration stages , 1988, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[3]  I. Nikolaidis Web Caching and Content Delivery [Book Review] , 2002, IEEE Network.

[4]  J. Cowan,et al.  Specificity and plasticity of retinotectal connections: a computational model , 1981, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[5]  R. Sperry CHEMOAFFINITY IN THE ORDERLY GROWTH OF NERVE FIBER PATTERNS AND CONNECTIONS. , 1963, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[6]  John G Flanagan,et al.  Complementary gradients in expression and binding of ELF-1 and Mek4 in development of the topographic retinotectal projection map , 1995, Cell.

[7]  Jack D. Cowan,et al.  Studies of a Model for the Development and Regeneration of Eye-Brain Maps , 1990, NIPS.

[8]  R. M. Gaze,et al.  The diencephalic course of regenerating retinotectal fibres in Xenopus tadpoles. , 1978, Journal of embryology and experimental morphology.

[9]  Jon H Kaas,et al.  Topographic Maps are Fundamental to Sensory Processing , 1997, Brain Research Bulletin.

[10]  Alexei A Koulakov,et al.  A stochastic model for retinocollicular map development , 2003, BMC Neuroscience.

[11]  D. O'Leary,et al.  Molecular gradients and development of retinotopic maps. , 2005, Annual review of neuroscience.

[12]  S. Levin Lectu re Notes in Biomathematics , 1983 .

[13]  Geoffrey J Goodhill,et al.  Theoretical models of neural circuit development. , 2009, Current topics in developmental biology.

[14]  John G. Flanagan,et al.  Genetic Analysis of Ephrin-A2 and Ephrin-A5 Shows Their Requirement in Multiple Aspects of Retinocollicular Mapping , 2000, Neuron.

[15]  T J Horder Retention, by fish optic nerve fibres regenerating to new terminal sites in the tectum, of 'chemospecific' affinity for their original sites. , 1971, The Journal of physiology.

[16]  Chi-Bin Chien,et al.  Pathfinding in a large vertebrate axon tract: isotypic interactions guide retinotectal axons at multiple choice points , 2008, Development.

[17]  G. Marcus,et al.  The topographic brain: from neural connectivity to cognition , 2007, Trends in Neurosciences.

[18]  Alexei A. Koulakov,et al.  A unifying model for activity-dependent and activity-independent mechanisms predicts complete structure of topographic maps in ephrin-A deficient mice , 2005, Journal of Computational Neuroscience.

[19]  M. Arbib,et al.  Systems Matching and Topographic Maps: The Branch-Arrow Model (BAM) , 1982 .

[20]  C. Holt,et al.  Retinal axons with and without their somata, growing to and arborizing in the tectum of Xenopus embryos: a time-lapse video study of single fibres in vivo. , 1987, Development.

[21]  Stephen J. Eglen,et al.  A Multi-Component Model of the Developing Retinocollicular Pathway Incorporating Axonal and Synaptic Growth , 2009, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[22]  David G. Wilkinson,et al.  Multiple roles of eph receptors and ephrins in neural development , 2001, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[23]  P. Raymond,et al.  Developing retinotectal projection in larval goldfish , 1989, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[24]  Michael A. Arbib,et al.  The Extended Branch-Arrow Model of the formation of retino-tectal connections , 2004, Biological Cybernetics.

[25]  Alfred Gierer,et al.  Directional cues for growing axons forming the retinotectal projection , 1987 .

[26]  Ian D. Thompson,et al.  Opposing Gradients of Ephrin-As and EphA7 in the Superior Colliculus Are Essential for Topographic Mapping in the Mammalian Visual System , 2005, Neuron.

[27]  S B Udin,et al.  Formation of topographic maps. , 1988, Annual review of neuroscience.

[28]  D J Willshaw,et al.  A marker induction mechanism for the establishment of ordered neural mappings: its application to the retinotectal problem. , 1979, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[29]  Jun Xu,et al.  The development of retinotectal maps: a review of models based on molecular gradients. , 2005, Network.

[30]  R. M. Gaze,et al.  The Visual System and “Neuronal Specificity” , 1972, Nature.

[31]  M. Yoon Progress of topographic regulation of the visual projection in the halved optic tectum of adult goldfish. , 1976, The Journal of physiology.

[32]  Gabriel Scicolone,et al.  Key roles of Ephs and ephrins in retinotectal topographic map formation , 2009, Brain Research Bulletin.

[33]  Analysis of mouse EphA knockins and knockouts , 2006 .

[34]  Friedrich Bonhoeffer,et al.  Position-dependent properties of retinal axons and their growth cones , 1985, Nature.

[35]  W. P. Hayes,et al.  Normal and regenerating optic fibers in goldfish tectum: HRP‐EM Evidence for rapid synaptogenesis and optic fiber‐fiber affinity , 1988, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[36]  D. O'Leary,et al.  Development of topographic order in the mammalian retinocollicular projection , 1992, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[37]  Elena B. Pasquale,et al.  Developmental cell biology: Eph receptor signalling casts a wide net on cell behaviour , 2005, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[38]  D. Willshaw,et al.  On a role for competition in the formation of patterned neural connexions , 1975, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.

[39]  R J Kaethner,et al.  Dynamics of terminal arbor formation and target approach of retinotectal axons in living zebrafish embryos: a time-lapse study of single axons , 1992, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[40]  Ingrid W. Caras,et al.  A link between axon guidance and axon fasciculation suggested by studies of the tyrosine kinase receptor EphA5/REK7 and its ligand Ephrin-A5/AL-1 , 1997, Cell and Tissue Research.

[41]  John G Flanagan,et al.  Topographically Specific Effects of ELF-1 on Retinal Axon Guidance In Vitro and Retinal Axon Mapping In Vivo , 1996, Cell.

[42]  W. Harris The transplantation of eyes to genetically eyeless salamanders: visual projections and somatosensory interactions , 1982, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[43]  A Gierer,et al.  Model for the retino-tectal projection , 1983, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.

[44]  E. S. Ruthazer,et al.  Insights into activity-dependent map formation from the retinotectal system: a middle-of-the-brain perspective. , 2004, Journal of neurobiology.

[45]  Herwig Baier,et al.  Retinotopic order in the absence of axon competition , 2008, Nature.

[46]  Cornelius Weber,et al.  DEVELOPMENT AND REGENERATION OF THE RETINOTECTAL MAP IN GOLDFISH : A COMPUTATIONAL STUDY , 1997 .

[47]  D H Perkel,et al.  Competitive and positional cues in the patterning of nerve connections. , 1990, Journal of neurobiology.

[48]  S. Easter,et al.  Expansion of the half retinal projection to the tectum in goldfish: An electrophysiological and Anatomical study , 1978, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[49]  Hisao Honda,et al.  Competition between Retinal Ganglion Axons for Targets under the Servomechanism Model Explains Abnormal Retinocollicular Projection of Eph Receptor-Overexpressing or Ephrin-Lacking Mice , 2003, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[50]  Greg Lemke,et al.  A relative signalling model for the formation of a topographic neural map , 2004, Nature.

[51]  R. M. Gaze,et al.  The growth of the retina in Xenopus laevis: an autoradiographic study. , 1971, Journal of embryology and experimental morphology.

[52]  R. M. Gaze,et al.  The arrow model: retinotectal specificity and map formation in the goldfish visual system , 1976, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.

[53]  M G Yoon Retention of the original topographic polarity by the 180 degrees rotated tectal reimplant in young adult goldfish. , 1973, The Journal of physiology.

[54]  Arjen Van Ooyen,et al.  Modeling neural development , 2003 .

[55]  Hajime Fujisawa,et al.  Retinotopic analysis of fiber pathways in the regenerating retinotectal system of the adult newt cynops pyrrhogaster , 1981, Brain Research.

[56]  M. Bastmeyer,et al.  Fish E587 glycoprotein, a member of the L1 family of cell adhesion molecules, participates in axonal fasciculation and the age-related order of ganglion cell axons in the goldfish retina , 1995, The Journal of cell biology.

[57]  H Honda,et al.  Topographic mapping in the retinotectal projection by means of complementary ligand and receptor gradients: a computer simulation study. , 1998, Journal of theoretical biology.

[58]  Horder Tj Retention, by fish optic nerve fibres regenerating to new terminal sites in the tectum, of 'chemospecific' affinity for their original sites. , 1971 .

[59]  Jürgen Löschinger,et al.  In vitro guidance of retinal ganglion cell axons by RAGS, a 25 kDa tectal protein related to ligands for Eph receptor tyrosine kinases , 1995, Cell.

[60]  Geoffrey J. Goodhill,et al.  Retinotectal maps: molecules, models and misplaced data , 1999, Trends in Neurosciences.

[61]  M. Yoon Retention of the original topographic polarity by the 180° rotated tectal reimplant in young adult goldfish , 1973 .

[62]  Paul A Yates,et al.  Computational modeling of retinotopic map development to define contributions of EphA-ephrinA gradients, axon-axon interactions, and patterned activity. , 2004, Journal of neurobiology.

[63]  Paul A Yates,et al.  Topographic Mapping from the Retina to the Midbrain Is Controlled by Relative but Not Absolute Levels of EphA Receptor Signaling , 2000, Cell.

[64]  John G Flanagan,et al.  Retinal Axon Response to Ephrin-As Shows a Graded, Concentration-Dependent Transition from Growth Promotion to Inhibition , 2004, Neuron.