When is search for a static target among dynamic distractors efficient?

Intuitively, dynamic visual stimuli, such as moving objects or flashing lights, attract attention. Visual search tasks have revealed that dynamic targets among static distractors can indeed efficiently guide attention. The present study shows that the reverse case, a static target among dynamic distractors, allows for relatively efficient selection in certain but not all cases. A static target was relatively efficiently found among distractors that featured apparent motion, corroborating earlier findings. The important new finding was that static targets were equally easily found among distractors that blinked on and off continuously, even when each individual item blinked at a random rate. However, search for a static target was less efficient when distractors abruptly varied in luminance but did not completely disappear. The authors suggest that the division into the parvocellular pathway dealing with static visual information, on the one hand, and the magnocellular pathway common to motion and new object onset detection, on the other hand, allows for efficient filtering of dynamic and static information.

[1]  D. Kahneman,et al.  The reviewing of object files: Object-specific integration of information , 1992, Cognitive Psychology.

[2]  UTE LEONARDS,et al.  The Influence of Temporal Phase Differences on Texture Segmentation , 1996, Vision Research.

[3]  H Pashler,et al.  Familiarity and visual change detection , 1988, Perception & psychophysics.

[4]  S. Zeki,et al.  A direct demonstration of perceptual asynchrony in vision , 1997, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[5]  David E. Irwin Information integration across saccadic eye movements , 1991, Cognitive Psychology.

[6]  S. Yantis,et al.  Abrupt visual onsets and selective attention: voluntary versus automatic allocation. , 1990, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[7]  Allen Allport,et al.  Visual attention , 1989 .

[8]  J. Theeuwes Perceptual selectivity for color and form , 1992, Perception & psychophysics.

[9]  S. Yantis,et al.  Object continuity in apparent motion and attention. , 1994, Canadian journal of experimental psychology = Revue canadienne de psychologie experimentale.

[10]  C. A. Marzi,et al.  A possible selective impairment of magnocellular function in compression of the anterior visual pathways , 1999, Experimental Brain Research.

[11]  D G Watson,et al.  Attention capture by contour onsets and offsets: No special role for onsets , 1995, Perception & psychophysics.

[12]  Blindness for Unchanging Targets in the Absence of Motion Filtering , 2005, Psychological science.

[13]  R. Blake,et al.  Visual features that vary together over time group together over space , 1998, Nature Neuroscience.

[14]  S. Yantis,et al.  Stimulus-driven attentional capture: evidence from equiluminant visual objects. , 1994, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[15]  W. Cowan,et al.  Visual search for colour targets that are or are not linearly separable from distractors , 1996, Vision Research.

[16]  Ronald A. Rensink,et al.  Change-blindness as a result of ‘mudsplashes’ , 1999, Nature.

[17]  Y. Yeshurun,et al.  Transient Spatial Attention Degrades Temporal Resolution , 2003, Psychological science.

[18]  J. Ross,et al.  Spatial limitations of temporal segmentation , 1999, Vision Research.

[19]  S. Yantis,et al.  Abrupt visual onsets and selective attention: evidence from visual search. , 1984, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[20]  W. A. Phillips On the distinction between sensory storage and short-term visual memory , 1974 .

[21]  Jon Driver,et al.  Visual search for a conjunction of movement and form is parallel , 1988, Nature.

[22]  Bruno G. Breitmeyer,et al.  Effects of isoluminant-background color on metacontrast and stroboscopic motion: Interactions between sustained (P) and transient (M) channels , 1990, Vision Research.

[23]  Derek H. Arnold,et al.  A paradox of temporal perception revealed by a stimulus oscillating in colour and orientation , 2003, Vision Research.

[24]  P. Burt,et al.  Time, distance, and feature trade-offs in visual apparent motion. , 1981, Psychological review.

[25]  R Blake,et al.  Spatial and temporal coherence in perceptual binding. , 1997, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[26]  J. Jonides Voluntary versus automatic control over the mind's eye's movement , 1981 .

[27]  Harold Pashler,et al.  4 - Involuntary Orienting to Flashing Distractors in Delayed Search? , 2001 .

[28]  B. Gibson,et al.  Attraction, Distraction and Action: Multiple Perspectives on Attentional Capture. Advances in Psychology , 2001 .

[29]  B G Breitmeyer,et al.  Implications of sustained and transient channels for theories of visual pattern masking, saccadic suppression, and information processing. , 1976, Psychological review.

[30]  H. Müller,et al.  Visual search for conjunctions of motion and form: display density and asymmetry reversal. , 1996, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[31]  R. W. Rodieck,et al.  Retinal ganglion cell classes in the Old World monkey: morphology and central projections. , 1981, Science.

[32]  Marius Usher,et al.  Visual synchrony affects binding and segmentation in perception , 1998, Nature.

[33]  S. Yantis,et al.  Mechanisms of attentional selection: Temporally modulated priority tags , 1991, Perception & psychophysics.

[34]  J T Todd,et al.  Implications of a transient-sustained dichotomy for the measurement of human performance. , 1979, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[35]  Terrence J. Sejnowski,et al.  Perceived luminance depends on temporal context , 2004, Nature.

[36]  G. Humphreys,et al.  Visual marking: prioritizing selection for new objects by top-down attentional inhibition of old objects. , 1997, Psychological review.

[37]  R W Remington,et al.  The structure of attentional control: contingent attentional capture by apparent motion, abrupt onset, and color. , 1994, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[38]  R Blake,et al.  Visual form created solely from temporal structure. , 1999, Science.

[39]  C. Koch,et al.  Spatial displacement, but not temporal asynchrony, destroys figural binding , 1995, Vision Research.

[40]  Michael D'Zmura,et al.  Color in visual search , 1991, Vision Research.

[41]  R. Andersen,et al.  Neural Mechanisms of Visual Motion Perception in Primates , 1997, Neuron.

[42]  J. C. Johnston,et al.  Involuntary attentional capture by abrupt onsets , 1992, Perception & psychophysics.

[43]  J. Stone,et al.  Properties of cat retinal ganglion cells: a comparison of W-cells with X- and Y-cells. , 1974, Journal of neurophysiology.

[44]  S. Yantis,et al.  Visual motion and attentional capture , 1994, Perception & psychophysics.

[45]  J. Movshon,et al.  Cortical oscillatory responses do not affect visual segmentation , 1996, Vision Research.

[46]  D. Simons In Sight, Out of Mind: When Object Representations Fail , 1996 .

[47]  Y. Yeshurun Isoluminant stimuli and red background attenuate the effects of transient spatial attention on temporal resolution , 2004, Vision Research.

[48]  Jan Theeuwes,et al.  Prioritizing selection of new elements: Bottom-up versus top-down control , 2003, Perception & psychophysics.

[49]  R. Abrams,et al.  Motion Onset Captures Attention , 2003, Psychological science.

[50]  M Fahle,et al.  Figure–ground discrimination from temporal information , 1993, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[51]  J. Theeuwes Exogenous and endogenous control of attention: The effect of visual onsets and offsets , 1991, Perception & psychophysics.

[52]  B. Gibson,et al.  Stimulus-driven attentional capture is contingent on attentional set for displaywide visual features. , 1998, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[53]  George Sperling,et al.  The information available in brief visual presentations. , 1960 .

[54]  Martin Arguin,et al.  Distinct Mechanisms Account for the Linear non–Separability and Conjunction Effects in Visual Shape Encoding , 2003, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[55]  J. C. Johnston,et al.  Involuntary covert orienting is contingent on attentional control settings. , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[56]  C. Heywood,et al.  Visual salience in the change detection paradigm: the special role of object onset. , 2004, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[57]  G H MOWBRAY,et al.  Differential sensitivity of the eye to intermittent white light. , 1955, Science.

[58]  S. Yantis,et al.  On the distinction between visual salience and stimulus-driven attentional capture. , 1999, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[59]  J. Wolfe,et al.  The role of categorization in visual search for orientation. , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[60]  J. Theeuwes No Blindness for Things that Do Not Change , 2004, Psychological science.

[61]  W. Levick,et al.  Sustained and transient neurones in the cat's retina and lateral geniculate nucleus , 1971, The Journal of physiology.

[62]  B. Bergum,et al.  Attention and performance IX , 1982 .

[63]  M. B. Mandler,et al.  Temporal frequency discrimination above threshold , 1984, Vision Research.

[64]  S. Yantis,et al.  Mechanisms of attentional priority. , 1990, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[65]  C. Enroth-Cugell,et al.  The contrast sensitivity of retinal ganglion cells of the cat , 1966, The Journal of physiology.

[66]  S. Yantis,et al.  New objects dominate luminance transients in setting attentional priority. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[67]  D. Hubel,et al.  Segregation of form, color, movement, and depth: anatomy, physiology, and perception. , 1988, Science.

[68]  Ronald A. Rensink Change detection. , 2002, Annual review of psychology.

[69]  D. Simons,et al.  Moving and looming stimuli capture attention , 2003, Perception & psychophysics.

[70]  S. Tipper,et al.  The medium of attention: Location-based, object-centered, or scene-based? , 1998 .

[71]  Time course of attention effects with abrupt-onset and offset single- and multiple-element precues. , 1999, The American journal of psychology.