Phase II Study Investigating the Safety and Efficacy of Savolitinib and Durvalumab in Metastatic Papillary Renal Cancer (CALYPSO)

PURPOSE Metastatic papillary renal cancer (PRC) has poor outcomes, and new treatments are required. There is a strong rationale for investigating mesenchymal epithelial transition receptor (MET) and programmed cell death ligand-1 (PD-L1) inhibition in this disease. In this study, the combination of savolitinib (MET inhibitor) and durvalumab (PD-L1 inhibitor) is investigated. METHODS This single-arm phase II trial explored durvalumab (1,500 mg once every four weeks) and savolitinib (600 mg once daily; ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02819596). Treatment-naïve or previously treated patients with metastatic PRC were included. A confirmed response rate (cRR) of > 50% was the primary end point. Progression-free survival, tolerability, and overall survival were secondary end points. Biomarkers were explored from archived tissue (MET-driven status). RESULTS Forty-one patients treated with advanced PRC were enrolled into this study and received at least one dose of study treatment. The majority of patients had Heng intermediate risk score (n = 26 [63%]). The cRR was 29% (n = 12; 95% CI, 16 to 46), and the trial therefore missed the primary end point. The cRR increased to 53% (95% CI, 28 to 77) in MET-driven patients (n/N = 9/27) and was 33% (95% CI, 17 to 54) in PD-L1–positive tumors (n/N = 9/27). The median progression-free survival was 4.9 months (95% CI, 2.5 to 10.0) in the treated population and 12.0 months (95% CI, 2.9 to 19.4) in MET-driven patients. The median overall survival was 14.1 months (95% CI, 7.3 to 30.7) in the treated population and 27.4 months (95% CI, 9.3 to not reached [NR]) in MET-driven patients. Grade 3 and above treatment related adverse events occurred in 17 (41%) patients. There was 1 grade 5 treatment-related adverse event (cerebral infarction). CONCLUSION The combination of savolitinib and durvalumab was tolerable and associated with high cRRs in the exploratory MET-driven subset.

[1]  Erratum: Phase II Study Investigating the Safety and Efficacy of Savolitinib and Durvalumab in Metastatic Papillary Renal Cancer (CALYPSO). , 2023, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[2]  R. Motzer,et al.  Phase II Trial of Cabozantinib Plus Nivolumab in Patients With Non–Clear-Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma and Genomic Correlates , 2022, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[3]  G. De Velasco,et al.  ESMO Clinical Practice Guideline update on the use of immunotherapy in early stage and advanced renal cell carcinoma. , 2021, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[4]  M. Atkins,et al.  Open-Label, Single-Arm, Phase II Study of Pembrolizumab Monotherapy as First-Line Therapy in Patients With Advanced Non–Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma , 2021, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[5]  I. Thompson,et al.  A comparison of sunitinib with cabozantinib, crizotinib, and savolitinib for treatment of advanced papillary renal cell carcinoma: a randomised, open-label, phase 2 trial , 2021, The Lancet.

[6]  S. Signoretti,et al.  Efficacy of Savolitinib vs Sunitinib in Patients With MET-Driven Papillary Renal Cell Carcinoma , 2020, JAMA oncology.

[7]  N. Rioux-Leclercq,et al.  Axitinib in first-line for patients with metastatic papillary renal cell carcinoma: Results of the multicentre, open-label, single-arm, phase II AXIPAP trial. , 2020, European journal of cancer.

[8]  Arnaud Boyer,et al.  Durvalumab after chemoradiotherapy in stage III non-small cell lung cancer. , 2018, Journal of thoracic disease.

[9]  S. Buti,et al.  First‐Line PAzopanib in NOn–clear‐cell Renal cArcinoMA: The Italian Retrospective Multicenter PANORAMA Study , 2017, Clinical genitourinary cancer.

[10]  T. Powles,et al.  Biomarker-Based Phase II Trial of Savolitinib in Patients With Advanced Papillary Renal Cell Cancer. , 2017, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[11]  P. Tamboli,et al.  Everolimus Versus Sunitinib Prospective Evaluation in Metastatic Non-Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma (ESPN): A Randomized Multicenter Phase 2 Trial. , 2016, European urology.

[12]  J. Hainsworth,et al.  Everolimus versus sunitinib for patients with metastatic non-clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ASPEN): a multicentre, open-label, randomised phase 2 trial. , 2016, The Lancet. Oncology.

[13]  G. Freeman,et al.  Novel Roles of c-Met in the Survival of Renal Cancer Cells through the Regulation of HO-1 and PD-L1 Expression* , 2015, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[14]  G. Gibney,et al.  c-Met is a prognostic marker and potential therapeutic target in clear cell renal cell carcinoma. , 2013, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[15]  G. Gibney,et al.  c-Met is a prognostic marker and potential therapeutic target in clear cell renal cell carcinoma. , 2013 .

[16]  R. Srinivasan,et al.  Phase II and biomarker study of the dual MET/VEGFR2 inhibitor foretinib in patients with papillary renal cell carcinoma. , 2013, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[17]  R. A’Hern Sample size tables for exact single‐stage phase II designs , 2001, Statistics in medicine.

[18]  P. Stephens,et al.  Characterization of Clinical Cases of Advanced Papillary Renal Cell Carcinoma via Comprehensive Genomic Profiling. , 2018, European urology.