Experimental identification of specificity determinants in the domain linker of a LacI/GalR protein: Bioinformatics‐based predictions generate true positives and false negatives

In protein families, conserved residues often contribute to a common general function, such as DNA‐binding. However, unique attributes for each homolog (e.g. recognition of alternative DNA sequences) must arise from variation in other functionally‐important positions. The locations of these “specificity determinant” positions are obscured amongst the background of varied residues that do not make significant contributions to either structure or function. To isolate specificity determinants, a number of bioinformatics algorithms have been developed. When applied to the LacI/GalR family of transcription regulators, several specificity determinants are predicted in the 18 amino acids that link the DNA‐binding and regulatory domains. However, results from alternative algorithms are only in partial agreement with each other. Here, we experimentally evaluate these predictions using an engineered repressor comprising the LacI DNA‐binding domain, the LacI linker, and the GalR regulatory domain (LLhG). “Wild‐type” LLhG has altered DNA specificity and weaker lacO1 repression compared to LacI or a similar LacI:PurR chimera. Next, predictions of linker specificity determinants were tested, using amino acid substitution and in vivo repression assays to assess functional change. In LLhG, all predicted sites are specificity determinants, as well as three sites not predicted by any algorithm. Strategies are suggested for diminishing the number of false negative predictions. Finally, individual substitutions at LLhG specificity determinants exhibited a broad range of functional changes that are not predicted by bioinformatics algorithms. Results suggest that some variants have altered affinity for DNA, some have altered allosteric response, and some appear to have changed specificity for alternative DNA ligands. Proteins 2008. © 2008 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.