Resting Myocardial Perfusion Quantification with Cmr Arterial Spin Labeling at 1.5 T and 3.0 T Recommended Citation Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Open Access Resting Myocardial Perfusion Quantification with Cmr Arterial Spin Labeling at 1.5 T and 3.0 T

Resting myocardial perfusion quantification with CMR arterial spin labeling at 1.5 T and 3.0 T. Abstract Background: The magnetic resonance technique of arterial spin labeling (ASL) allows myocardial perfusion to be quantified without the use of a contrast agent. This study aimed to use a modified ASL technique and T 1 regression algorithm, previously validated in canine models, to calculate myocardial blood flow (MBF) in normal human subjects and to compare the accuracy and repeatability of this calculation at 1.5 T and 3.0 T. A computer simulation was performed and compared with experimental findings.

[1]  N. Tamaki,et al.  Absolute quantification of myocardial blood flow , 2018, Journal of Nuclear Cardiology.

[2]  R. Kim,et al.  Detection of myocardial ischemia by stress perfusion cardiovascular magnetic resonance. , 2007, Cardiology clinics.

[3]  K. Sidaros,et al.  Slice profile optimization in arterial spin labeling using presaturation and optimized RF pulses. , 2006, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[4]  Brian M Dale,et al.  Abdominal MRI at 3.0 T: the basics revisited. , 2006, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[5]  P. Kellman,et al.  Quantitative myocardial perfusion analysis with a dual‐bolus contrast‐enhanced first‐pass MRI technique in humans , 2006, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[6]  R. Buxton.  Quantifying CBF with arterial spin labeling , 2005, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[7]  Matthias Gutberlet,et al.  In vitro validation of phase‐contrast flow measurements at 3 T in comparison to 1.5 T: Precision, accuracy, and signal‐to‐noise ratios , 2005, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[8]  Haosen Zhang,et al.  Accurate myocardial T1 measurements: Toward quantification of myocardial blood flow with arterial spin labeling , 2005, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[9]  S. Kaul,et al.  The coronary microcirculation in health and disease. , 2004, Cardiology clinics.

[10]  R. Ordidge,et al.  TurboFLASH FAIR imaging with optimized inversion and imaging profiles , 2004, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[11]  Georg Ertl,et al.  Quantitative assessment of myocardial perfusion with a spin‐labeling technique: Preliminary results in patients with coronary artery disease , 2003, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[12]  David G Norris,et al.  High field human imaging , 2003, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[13]  A. L'Abbate,et al.  How to study coronary microvascular dysfunction and its clinical relevance. , 2002, Italian heart journal : official journal of the Italian Federation of Cardiology.

[14]  O. Simonetti,et al.  Contrast‐enhanced coronary MR angiography: Relationship between coronary artery delineation and blood T1 , 2001, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[15]  Georg Ertl,et al.  Fast High-Resolution Magnetic Resonance Imaging Demonstrates Fractality of Myocardial Perfusion in Microscopic Dimensions , 2001, Circulation research.

[16]  A Haase,et al.  Myocardial perfusion and intracapillary blood volume in rats at rest and with coronary dilatation: MR imaging in vivo with use of a spin-labeling technique. , 2000, Radiology.

[17]  P. V. van Zijl,et al.  Effect of transit times on quantification of cerebral blood flow by the FAIR T1‐difference approach , 1999, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[18]  Jinyuan Zhou,et al.  Perfusion imaging using FAIR with a short predelay , 1999, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[19]  P. V. van Zijl,et al.  FAIR excluding radiation damping (FAIRER) , 1998, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[20]  Jeff H. Duyn,et al.  Multislice Imaging of Quantitative Cerebral Perfusion with Pulsed Arterial Spin-Labeling , 1998, NeuroImage.

[21]  R B Buxton,et al.  Slice profile effects in adiabatic inversion: Application to multislice perfusion imaging , 1997, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[22]  S. Rahimtoola.  Hibernating myocardium has reduced blood flow at rest that increases with low-dose dobutamine. , 1996, Circulation.

[23]  H. Schelbert,et al.  Noninvasive quantification of myocardial blood flow in humans. A direct comparison of the [13N]ammonia and the [15O]water techniques. , 1996, Circulation.

[24]  A Haase,et al.  Quantitative magnetic resonance imaging of perfusion using magnetic labeling of water proton spins within the detection slice , 1996, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[25]  T. L. Davis,et al.  Mr perfusion studies with t1‐weighted echo planar imaging , 1995, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[26]  Seong-Gi Kim.  Quantification of relative cerebral blood flow change by flow‐sensitive alternating inversion recovery (FAIR) technique: Application to functional mapping , 1995, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[27]  R. Edelman,et al.  Coronary arteries: breath-hold MR angiography. , 1991, Radiology.

[28]  W. Edelstein,et al.  The intrinsic signal‐to‐noise ratio in NMR imaging , 1986, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[29]  B. Sobel,et al.  Quantification of regional myocardial blood flow in vivo with H215O. , 1984, Circulation.

[30]  Haosen Zhang,et al.  Feasibility study of myocardial perfusion and oxygenation by noncontrast MRI: comparison with PET study in a canine model. , 2008, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[31]  J. Helpern,et al.  Perfusion imaging by un-inverted flow-sensitive alternating inversion recovery (UNFAIR). , 1997, Magnetic resonance imaging.