A novel methodology for generating 3D finite element models of the hip from 2D radiographs.

Finite element (FE) modelling has been proposed as a tool for estimating fracture risk and patient-specific FE models are commonly based on computed tomography (CT). Here, we present a novel method to automatically create personalised 3D models from standard 2D hip radiographs. A set of geometrical parameters of the femur were determined from seven a-p hip radiographs and compared to the 3D femoral shape obtained from CT as training material; the error in reconstructing the 3D model from the 2D radiographs was assessed. Using the geometry parameters as the input, the 3D shape of another 21 femora was built and meshed, separating a cortical and trabecular compartment. The material properties were derived from the homogeneity index assessed by texture analysis of the radiographs, with focus on the principal tensile and compressive trabecular systems. The ability of these FE models to predict failure load as determined by experimental biomechanical testing was evaluated and compared to the predictive ability of DXA. The average reconstruction error of the 3D models was 1.77 mm (±1.17 mm), with the error being smallest in the femoral head and neck, and greatest in the trochanter. The correlation of the FE predicted failure load with the experimental failure load was r(2)=64% for the reconstruction FE model, which was significantly better (p<0.05) than that for DXA (r(2)=24%). This novel method for automatically constructing a patient-specific 3D finite element model from standard 2D radiographs shows encouraging results in estimating patient-specific failure loads.

[1]  M. Nevitt,et al.  Active Shape Modeling of the Hip in the Prediction of Incident Hip Fracture , 2010, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[2]  P. Meunier Prevention of hip fractures. , 1993, The American journal of medicine.

[3]  Isao Ohnishi,et al.  Prediction of the strength and fracture location of the femoral neck by CT-based finite-element method: a preliminary study on patients with hip fracture , 2004, Journal of orthopaedic science : official journal of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association.

[4]  H. Skinner,et al.  Three-dimensional finite element modelling of bone: effects of element size. , 1992, Journal of biomedical engineering.

[5]  Volker Kuhn,et al.  Reproducibility and Side Differences of Mechanical Tests for Determining the Structural Strength of the Proximal Femur , 2003, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[6]  J. Kanis,et al.  Diagnosis of osteoporosis and assessment of fracture risk , 2002, The Lancet.

[7]  Guoyan Zheng,et al.  A 2D/3D correspondence building method for reconstruction of a patient-specific 3D bone surface model using point distribution models and calibrated X-ray images , 2009, Medical Image Anal..

[8]  A. Hofman,et al.  Fracture incidence and association with bone mineral density in elderly men and women: the Rotterdam Study. , 2004, Bone.

[9]  J. Wolff Das Gesetz der Transformation der Knochen , 1893 .

[10]  David Mitton,et al.  Prediction of femoral fracture load: cross-sectional study of texture analysis and geometric measurements on plain radiographs versus bone mineral density. , 2010, Radiology.

[11]  T. Myers,et al.  A structural approach , 1998 .

[12]  H. Skinner,et al.  Correlations between orthogonal mechanical properties and density of trabecular bone: use of different densitometric measures. , 1994, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[13]  Angelo Cappello,et al.  A new software for prediction of femoral neck fractures , 2004, Comput. Methods Programs Biomed..

[14]  L Cristofolini,et al.  A comparative study on different methods of automatic mesh generation of human femurs. , 1998, Medical engineering & physics.

[15]  T. Jämsä,et al.  Experimental hip fracture load can be predicted from plain radiography by combined analysis of trabecular bone structure and bone geometry , 2008, Osteoporosis International.

[16]  Mircea Arcan,et al.  Trabecular bone adaptation with an orthotropic material model. , 2002, Journal of biomechanics.

[17]  T. Keller Predicting the compressive mechanical behavior of bone. , 1994, Journal of biomechanics.

[18]  J. Wolff The Law of Bone Remodelling , 1986, Springer Berlin Heidelberg.

[19]  T. Jämsä,et al.  BMD T-score discriminates trochanteric fractures from unfractured controls, whereas geometry discriminates cervical fracture cases from unfractured controls of similar BMD , 2010, Osteoporosis International.

[20]  D. C. Drucker,et al.  Soil mechanics and plastic analysis or limit design , 1952 .

[21]  Ego Seeman,et al.  Femoral neck shape and the spatial distribution of its mineral mass varies with its size: Clinical and biomechanical implications. , 2005, Bone.

[22]  S. Schumann,et al.  Validation of statistical shape model based reconstruction of the proximal femur--A morphology study. , 2010, Medical engineering & physics.

[23]  Timo Jämsä,et al.  Trabecular Homogeneity Index Derived From Plain Radiograph to Evaluate Bone Quality , 2013, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[24]  G. Niebur,et al.  Comparison of the elastic and yield properties of human femoral trabecular and cortical bone tissue. , 2004, Journal of biomechanics.

[25]  P. Delmas,et al.  Structural determinants of hip fracture in elderly women: re-analysis of the data from the EPIDOS study , 2006, Osteoporosis International.

[26]  S. Cummings,et al.  Epidemiology and outcomes of osteoporotic fractures , 2002, The Lancet.

[27]  Prasanth B. Nair,et al.  Use of a statistical model of the whole femur in a large scale, multi-model study of femoral neck fracture risk. , 2009, Journal of biomechanics.

[28]  T Jämsä,et al.  Influence of the Upper Femur and Pelvic Geometry on the Risk and Type of Hip Fractures , 2001, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[29]  M Lengsfeld,et al.  Comparison of geometry-based and CT voxel-based finite element modelling and experimental validation. , 1998, Medical engineering & physics.

[30]  D. Hans,et al.  Different Morphometric and Densitometric Parameters Predict Cervical and Trochanteric Hip Fracture: The EPIDOS Study , 1997, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[31]  J. Michelotti,et al.  Femoral Neck Length and Hip Fracture Risk , 1999, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[32]  F. Eckstein,et al.  Ct-based finite element models can be used to estimate experimentally measured failure loads in the proximal femur. , 2012, Bone.

[33]  R. Giardino,et al.  Proximal Femur Geometry To Detect and Distinguish Femoral Neck Fractures from Trochanteric Fractures in Postmenopausal Women , 2002, Osteoporosis International.

[34]  J. Keyak,et al.  Generation of a 3D proximal femur shape from a single projection 2D radiographic image , 2009, Osteoporosis International.

[35]  Rachid Harba,et al.  Anisotropy changes in post-menopausal osteoporosis: characterization by a new index applied to trabecular bone radiographic images , 2005, Osteoporosis International.

[36]  Timo Jämsä,et al.  Combination of bone mineral density and upper femur geometry improves the prediction of hip fracture , 2004, Osteoporosis International.

[37]  V. Bousson,et al.  Prediction of mechanical properties of cortical bone by quantitative computed tomography. , 2008, Medical engineering & physics.

[38]  J. Meakin,et al.  Compression or Tension? the Stress Distribution in the Proximal Femur , 2022 .

[39]  J H Keyak,et al.  Prediction of femoral fracture load using finite element models: an examination of stress- and strain-based failure theories. , 2000, Journal of biomechanics.

[40]  Haisheng Yang,et al.  Some factors that affect the comparison between isotropic and orthotropic inhomogeneous finite element material models of femur. , 2010, Medical engineering & physics.

[41]  F. Eckstein,et al.  Discrimination of Cervical and Trochanteric Hip Fractures Using Radiography-Based Two-Dimensional Finite Element Models , 2009 .

[42]  Kozo Nakamura,et al.  Prediction of strength and strain of the proximal femur by a CT-based finite element method. , 2007, Journal of biomechanics.

[43]  S. Goldstein,et al.  Femoral strength is better predicted by finite element models than QCT and DXA. , 1999, Journal of biomechanics.

[44]  Marco Viceconti,et al.  Subject-specific finite element models implementing a maximum principal strain criterion are able to estimate failure risk and fracture location on human femurs tested in vitro. , 2008, Journal of biomechanics.

[45]  R. Aspden,et al.  A method for assessment of the shape of the proximal femur and its relationship to osteoporotic hip fracture , 2004, Osteoporosis International.

[46]  Kenji Shimada,et al.  Cost‐ and time‐effective three‐dimensional bone‐shape reconstruction from X‐ray images , 2007, The international journal of medical robotics + computer assisted surgery : MRCAS.

[47]  F. Eckstein,et al.  Association of Geometric Factors and Failure Load Level With the Distribution of Cervical vs. Trochanteric Hip Fractures , 2006, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[48]  G U Rao,et al.  Predicting femoral neck strength from bone mineral data. A structural approach. , 1990, Investigative radiology.

[49]  L. Claes,et al.  Prediction of fracture load at different skeletal sites by geometric properties of the cortical shell , 1996, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[50]  A. Cappello,et al.  Prediction of Hip Fracture Can Be Significantly Improved by a Single Biomedical Indicator , 2002, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.