Robustness and efficiency of an acoustically coupled two-source superdirective array

In a number of applications it is desirable to reproduce sound in a specific region whilst minimising it elsewhere. This can, in theory, be achieved using loudspeaker arrays and optimal, or superdirective beamforming techniques. However, these superdirective methods generally require a large electrical power at low frequencies, where the wavelength is large compared to the array, and are generally sensitive to practical uncertainties that may occur in the electroacoustic response of the loudspeaker array. In order to overcome these limitations, regularisation is often used to constrain the electrical power requirements of these arrays and improve their robustness to response uncertainties. However, in the context of a two-source line array an alternative method of reducing the required electrical power by coupling the two loudspeakers together via a common acoustic enclosure has been proposed. This paper investigates the performance of the coupled two-source loudspeaker array, and compares its performance to the standard uncoupled two-source array in terms of the acoustic contrast, electrical power requirement and robustness to uncertainties in the system’s responses. It is firstly shown through a series of simulations that when there is no uncertainty in the responses, although the two arrays achieve the same acoustic contrast performance, the electrical power required by the coupled array is about 100 times lower than that required by the uncoupled array at low frequencies. It is then shown that the coupled array is significantly more robust to response uncertainties than the uncoupled array and, even when the electrical power required by the uncoupled array is limited to be equal to that required by the coupled array, it achieves a higher level of acoustic contrast performance.

[1]  Marcos F. Simón Gálvez,et al.  A superdirective array of phase shift sources. , 2012, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[2]  Jordan Cheer,et al.  Minimally radiating sources for personal audio. , 2010, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[3]  F. Jacobsen,et al.  Sound field control with a circular double-layer array of loudspeakers. , 2012, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[4]  Chan-Hui Lee,et al.  A realization of sound focused personal audio system using acoustic contrast control. , 2009, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[5]  Stephen J Elliott,et al.  An active headrest for personal audio. , 2006, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[6]  P. Jackson,et al.  Personal audio with a planar bright zone. , 2014, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[7]  Jordan Cheer,et al.  Robustness and Regularization of Personal Audio Systems , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Audio, Speech, and Language Processing.

[8]  Jordan Cheer,et al.  The effect of reverberation on personal audio devices. , 2014, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[9]  Gene H. Golub,et al.  Matrix computations , 1983 .

[10]  Young-Tae Kim,et al.  Practical implementation of personal audio in a mobile device , 2013 .

[11]  Yang-Hann Kim,et al.  Acoustic contrast sensitivity to transfer function errors in the design of a personal audio system. , 2013, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[12]  Yang-Hann Kim,et al.  Generation of an acoustically bright zone with an illuminated region using multiple sources. , 2002, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[13]  Jordan Cheer,et al.  Design and Implementation of a Car Cabin Personal Audio System , 2013 .