Information overload: when less is more in medical imaging

Abstract In medicine, data collection and analysis provide the information needed to reduce diagnostic uncertainty. An examination of how medical imaging data is collected and then transformed into diagnostic information provides testable ideas for better managing this dynamic process. In other fields, process data is systematically assessed for differences between observed and predicted values. For studies that expose patients to the potentially harmful effects of ionizing radiation, monitoring imaging studies/illness, images/imaging study and radiation exposure/image would be steps towards developing radiation dose budgets for the diagnosis and treatment of common conditions. Random variation within the expected range would signal a high quality process. Conversely, single outlying cases or nonrandom variation within the expected range would trigger an investigation for a possible underlying cause. Such investigations would provide insights into how to continually improve this important aspect of healthcare.

[1]  Sang Joon Kim,et al.  A Mathematical Theory of Communication , 2006 .

[2]  R. Khorasani,et al.  Effect of Evidence-based Clinical Decision Support on the Use and Yield of CT Pulmonary Angiographic Imaging in Hospitalized Patients. , 2015, Radiology.

[3]  D M Berwick,et al.  Controlling Variation in Health Care: A Consultation from Walter Shewhart , 1991, Medical care.

[4]  D. Miglioretti,et al.  Rising use of diagnostic medical imaging in a large integrated health system. , 2008, Health affairs.

[5]  P. B. Petersen The New Economics for Industry, Government, Education , 1993 .

[6]  Radiation Exposure: Optimizing Image Quality or Image Utility? , 2015, Journal of patient safety.

[7]  J. Duncan,et al.  Using information to optimize medical outcomes. , 2009, JAMA.

[8]  Lloyd P. Provost,et al.  The Health Care Data Guide: Learning from Data for Improvement , 2011 .

[9]  R. Morin,et al.  Radiation dose and safety: informatics standards and tools. , 2014, Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR.

[10]  Deborah Rose,et al.  The Digital Doctor: Hope, Hype, and Harm at the Dawn of Medicine’s Computer Age , 2018 .

[11]  D. Miglioretti,et al.  Radiation dose metrics in CT: assessing dose using the National Quality Forum CT patient safety measure. , 2014, Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR.

[12]  W. Deming The New Economics for Industry, Government, Education - 2nd Edition , 2000 .

[13]  Len Lichtenfeld,et al.  Overdiagnosed: Making People Sick in Pursuit of Health , 2011 .

[14]  J. Iglehart Health insurers and medical-imaging policy--a work in progress. , 2009, The New England journal of medicine.

[15]  S. Abbara ACCF/SCCT/ACR/AHA/ASE/ASNC/NASCI/SCAI/SCMR 2010 Appropriate Use Criteria for Cardiac Computed Tomography , 2011 .

[16]  Kathryn Graziano The innovator's dilemma: When new technologies cause great firms to fail , 1998 .

[17]  Donald L. Miller,et al.  Optimizing radiation use during fluoroscopic procedures: proceedings from a multidisciplinary consensus panel. , 2011, Journal of vascular and interventional radiology : JVIR.