On defining image schemas

In this theoretical paper we propose three diff erent kinds of cognitive structure that have not been diff erentiated in the psychological and cognitive linguistic literatures. They are spatial primitives , image schemas , and schematic integrations . Spatial primitives are the fi conceptual building blocks formed in infancy, image schemas are simple spatial stories built from them, and schematic integrations use the fi rst two types to build concepts that include non-spatial elements, such as force and emotion. These diff erent kinds of structure have all come under the umbrella term of ‘image schemas’. However, they diff er in their content, developmental origin, imageability, and role in meaning construction in language and in thought. The present paper indicates how preverbal conceptualization needs to be taken into account for a complete understanding of image schemas and their uses. It provides examples to illustrate this infl uence, the most important of these being the primacy of imageable spatial information.

[1]  G. Lakoff,et al.  Metaphors We Live By , 1980 .

[2]  E. Spelke,et al.  Origins of knowledge. , 1992, Psychological review.

[3]  Leonard Talmy,et al.  Force Dynamics in Language and Cognition , 1987, Cogn. Sci..

[4]  G. Fauconnier,et al.  The Way We Think: Conceptual Blending and the Mind''s Hidden Complexities. Basic Books , 2002 .

[5]  Kelly McCormick,et al.  How Linguistic and Cultural Forces Shape Conceptions of Time: English and Mandarin Time in 3D , 2011, Cogn. Sci..

[6]  S. Ozçalişkan,et al.  On learning to draw the distinction between physical and metaphorical motion: is metaphor an early emerging cognitive and linguistic capacity? , 2005, Journal of Child Language.

[7]  John A. Michon,et al.  Guyau and the Idea of Time , 1989 .

[8]  Jean M. Mandler,et al.  A leaner nativist solution to the origin of concepts , 2011, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[9]  B. Hampe,et al.  Image schemas in Cognitive Linguistics: Introduction , 2005 .

[10]  G. Fauconnier.  Mappings in thought and language , 1997 .

[11]  L. Gleitman,et al.  When English proposes what Greek presupposes: The cross-linguistic encoding of motion events , 2006, Cognition.

[12]  D. Frye,et al.  Object-person discrimination and communication at 3 and 10 months , 1983 .

[13]  H. H. Clark.  SPACE, TIME, SEMANTICS, AND THE CHILD , 1973 .

[14]  L. Gogate,et al.  Attention and memory for faces and actions in infancy: the salience of actions over faces in dynamic events. , 2002, Child development.

[15]  R. Gibbs.  Embodiment and Cognitive Science: Concepts , 2005 .

[16]  J. Mandler,et al.  Studies in Inductive Inference in Infancy , 1998, Cognitive Psychology.

[17]  Ellen Winner,et al.  "Metaphorical" Mapping in Human Infants , 1981 .

[18]  Susan J. Hespos,et al.  Conceptual development in infancy: The case of containment , 2002 .

[19]  Mark L. Johnson.  The body in the mind: the bodily basis of meaning , 1987 .

[20]  Barbara Landau,et al.  Conceptual Foundations of Spatial Language: Evidence for a Goal Bias in Infants , 2007 .

[21]  J. Russell,et al.  A closer look at preschoolers' freely produced labels for facial expressions. , 2003, Developmental psychology.

[22]  G. Lakoff,et al.  Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things: What Categories Reveal about the Mind , 1988 .

[23]  W. Bruce Croft,et al.  Domains, image-schemas and construal. , 1999 .

[24]  S. Carey.  The Origin of Concepts , 2000 .

[25]  G. Csibra,et al.  Goal attribution without agency cues: the perception of ‘pure reason’ in infancy , 1999, Cognition.

[26]  T. Vecchi,et al.  Blind Vision: The Neuroscience of Visual Impairment , 2011 .

[27]  G. Mandler.  Mind and Body: Psychology of Emotion and Stress , 1984 .

[28]  Robert B. Dewell.  Dynamic patterns of CONTAINMENT , 2012 .

[29]  Gilles Fauconnier,et al.  Conceptual Projection and Middle Spaces , 2008 .

[30]  Nora S. Newcombe,et al.  Infants' coding of location in continuous space. , 1999 .

[31]  M. Legerstee.  A review of the animate-inanimate distinction in infancy: Implications for models of social and cognitive knowing , 1992 .

[32]  P. D. Eimas,et al.  Evidence for Representations of Perceptually Similar Natural Categories by 3-Month-Old and 4-Month-Old Infants , 1993, Perception.

[33]  J. Mandler.  How to build a baby: II. Conceptual primitives. , 1992, Psychological review.

[34]  Jean M. Mandler,et al.  The spatial foundations of the conceptual system , 2010, Language and Cognition.

[35]  Mark H. Johnson,et al.  Biology and Cognitive Development: The Case of Face Recognition , 1993 .

[36]  J. Russell,et al.  Children acquire emotion categories gradually , 2008 .

[37]  Jean M. Mandler,et al.  On the Spatial Foundations of the Conceptual System and Its Enrichment , 2012, Cogn. Sci..

[38]  D. Swingley,et al.  At 6–9 months, human infants know the meanings of many common nouns , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[39]  Marc Ouellet,et al.  In hindsight, life flows from left to right , 2010, Psychological research.

[40]  Carolyn Rovee-Collier,et al.  Latent Learning and Deferred Imitation at 3 Months. , 2005, Infancy : the official journal of the International Society on Infant Studies.

[41]  Z. Kövecses,et al.  Metaphor in Culture: Universality and Variation , 2005 .

[42]  R. Baillargeon,et al.  Young infants' reasoning about hidden objects: evidence from violation-of-expectation tasks with test trials only , 2004, Cognition.

[43]  J. Mandler.  On the Birth and Growth of Concepts , 2008 .

[44]  A. Leslie.  The Perception of Causality in Infants , 1982, Perception.

[45]  S. Pauen,et al.  Early differentiation within the animate domain: are humans something special? , 2000, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[46]  A. Woodward.  Infants selectively encode the goal object of an actor's reach , 1998, Cognition.

[47]  J. Grady.  Image schemas and perception: Refining a definition , 2005 .

[48]  R. Baillargeon,et al.  When the ordinary seems unexpected: evidence for incremental physical knowledge in young infants , 2005, Cognition.

[49]  L. Gleitman,et al.  Language and Experience: Evidence from the Blind Child , 1988 .

[50]  Jean M. Mandler,et al.  A summary of The foundations of mind: Origins of conceptual thought , 2004 .

[51]  J. Grady.  THEORIES ARE BUILDINGS revisited , 1997 .

[52]  A. Gopnik,et al.  Early reasoning about desires: evidence from 14- and 18-month-olds. , 1997, Developmental psychology.

[53]  David Barner,et al.  Slow mapping: Color word learning as a gradual inductive process , 2013, Cognition.

[54]  P. Bauer,et al.  When the event is more than the sum of its parts: 9-month-olds' long-term ordered recall. , 1999, Memory.

[55]  Daniel Casasanto,et al.  Space and Time in the Child's Mind: Evidence for a Cross-Dimensional Asymmetry , 2010, Cogn. Sci..

[56]  F. Simion,et al.  A predisposition for biological motion in the newborn baby , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[57]  J. Mandler,et al.  Putting the horse before the cart: The use of temporal order in recall of events by one-year-old children. , 1992 .

[58]  G. Lakoff.  The Contemporary Theory of Metaphor , 1993 .

[59]  Seana Coulson,et al.  Understanding Timelines: Conceptual Metaphor and Conceptual Integration , 2009 .

[60]  Rafael E. Núñez,et al.  With the Future Behind Them: Convergent Evidence From Aymara Language and Gesture in the Crosslinguistic Comparison of Spatial Construals of Time , 2006, Cogn. Sci..

[61]  J. Mandler,et al.  Understanding spatial relations: Flexible infants, lexical adults , 2003, Cognitive Psychology.

[62]  J. Zlatev.  What's in a schema? Bodily mimesis and the grounding of language , 2005 .

[63]  Herbert L. Colston,et al.  The cognitive psychological reality of image schemas and their transformations , 1995 .

[64]  A. Leslie.  Mapping the mind: ToMM, ToBY, and Agency: Core architecture and domain specificity , 1994 .

[65]  G. Csibra.  Goal attribution to inanimate agents by 6.5-month-old infants , 2008, Cognition.

[66]  Kelly L. Madole,et al.  The relation between infants' activity with objects and attention to object appearance. , 2008, Developmental psychology.

[67]  R. Baillargeon,et al.  Young infants’ reasoning about physical events involving inert and self-propelled objects , 2009, Cognitive Psychology.

[68]  B. Landau,et al.  Starting at the end: the importance of goals in spatial language , 2005, Cognition.

[69]  Z. Kövecses,et al.  Metaphor and Emotion: Language, Culture, and Body in Human Feeling , 2000 .

[70]  Rochel Gelman,et al.  Young infants have biological expectations about animals , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[71]  Marshall M. Haith,et al.  Rules That Babies Look By: The Organization of Newborn Visual Activity , 1980 .

[72]  S. Carey,et al.  The long and the short of it: On the nature and origin of functional overlap between representations of space and time , 2010, Cognition.

[73]  Susan J. Hespos,et al.  Reasoning about containment events in very young infants , 2001, Cognition.

[74]  Katherine Nelson,et al.  Language In Cognitive Development , 1996 .

[75]  J. Piaget.  Play, dreams and imitation in childhood , 1951 .

[76]  D. Gentner.  Structure‐Mapping: A Theoretical Framework for Analogy* , 1983 .

[77]  E. Spelke,et al.  Number-Space Mapping in Human Infants , 2010, Psychological science.

[78]  Susan J. Hespos,et al.  Infants' Knowledge About Occlusion and Containment Events: A Surprising Discrepancy , 2001, Psychological science.

[79]  R. Baillargeon,et al.  2.5-Month-Old Infants' Reasoning about When Objects Should and Should Not Be Occluded , 1999, Cognitive Psychology.

[80]  P. Rochat,et al.  Young infants' sensitivity to movement information specifying social causality , 1997 .