Water within, moving through, and shaping the Earth's surface: Introducing a special issue on water in the critical zone

As the sole habitat for terrestrial life, the Earth's critical zone (CZ) refers to the upper, porous layer of the continental crust that is interacting with the circulating meteoric waters. Conceptually, water is central to the intriguing co‐evolution of both the hydrologic behaviour and the structure of the CZ. On one hand, the path and rate of water circulating through the CZ are shaped by the CZ physical structure itself, such as the distribution of material porosity and permeability. On the other hand, and at longer time scales, the circulating water shapes the CZ structure through physical and chemical alterations of porosity and permeability and through being an agent of denudation, thereby reshaping the surface of the CZ and shifting its hydraulic boundaries. It is possible to alternate between thinking of the CZ as a storage container for water or thinking of water as an agent shaping CZ architecture, in much the same way that it is possible either to see a vase or to see profiles of two faces in the classic Rubin's vase illusion (Figure 1). This perspective shifting duality of the water–CZ relationship is further modulated by biological forces such as plants and soil organisms, as well as anthropogenic actions that both alter the flow and chemistry of the water in the CZ. How the modern‐day CZ structure shapes current hydrologic processes, how vegetation and humans alter the hydrology and biogeochemistry of the CZ, and how the hydrology and CZ structure co‐evolve via feedbacks arising from this duality of the water–CZ relationship are the three broad categories of questions that motivated this collection of 20 papers comprising the Special Issue of Hydrological Processes on Water in the Critical Zone. A brief introduction to the contributions organized by these overarching questions follows.

[1]  K. Singha,et al.  Transpiration‐ and precipitation‐induced subsurface water flow observed using the self‐potential method , 2019, Hydrological Processes.

[2]  C. Harman,et al.  A low‐dimensional model of bedrock weathering and lateral flow coevolution in hillslopes: 2. Controls on weathering and permeability profiles, drainage hydraulics, and solute export pathways , 2019, Hydrological Processes.

[3]  Minseok Kim,et al.  A low‐dimensional model of bedrock weathering and lateral flow coevolution in hillslopes: 1. Hydraulic theory of reactive transport , 2019, Hydrological Processes.

[4]  J. Hartmann,et al.  Catchment chemostasis revisited: Water quality responds differently to variations in weather and climate , 2017, Hydrological Processes.

[5]  G. Tallec,et al.  Chemical weathering and CO2 consumption rate in a multilayered‐aquifer dominated watershed under intensive farming: The Orgeval Critical Zone Observatory, France , 2018, Hydrological Processes.

[6]  M. Goulden,et al.  Evapotranspiration response to multiyear dry periods in the semiarid western United States , 2018, Hydrological Processes.

[7]  S. P. Anderson,et al.  Climate driven coevolution of weathering profiles and hillslope topography generates dramatic differences in critical zone architecture , 2018, Hydrological Processes.

[8]  D. Grana,et al.  Estimating the water holding capacity of the critical zone using near‐surface geophysics , 2018, Hydrological Processes.

[9]  A. Stumpf,et al.  Impacts of environmental stressors on the water resources of intensively managed hydrologic systems , 2018, Hydrological Processes.

[10]  A. Binley,et al.  Characterizing the heterogeneity of karst critical zone and its hydrological function: An integrated approach , 2018, Hydrological Processes.

[11]  S. Godsey,et al.  Concentration–discharge relationships describe solute and sediment mobilization, reaction, and transport at event and longer timescales , 2018, Hydrological Processes.

[12]  M. Mast,et al.  Linking transit times to catchment sensitivity to atmospheric deposition of acidity and nitrogen in mountains of the western United States , 2018, Hydrological Processes.

[13]  W. Dietrich,et al.  Quantification of the seasonal hillslope water storage that does not drive streamflow , 2018 .

[14]  Gerard Govers,et al.  Impacts of forest conversion and agriculture practices on water pathways in Southern Brazil , 2018, Hydrological Processes.

[15]  L. A. Bearup,et al.  Factors controlling seasonal groundwater and solute flux from snow‐dominated basins , 2018, Hydrological Processes.

[16]  Zhao Jin,et al.  Soil moisture response to rainfall on the Chinese Loess Plateau after a long‐term vegetation rehabilitation , 2018, Hydrological Processes.

[17]  H. Laudon,et al.  Storage, mixing, and fluxes of water in the critical zone across northern environments inferred by stable isotopes of soil water , 2018, Hydrological Processes.

[18]  M. Zimmer,et al.  Run‐off processes from mountains to foothills: The role of soil stratigraphy and structure in influencing run‐off characteristics across high to low relief landscapes , 2018 .

[19]  K. Singha,et al.  Influence of climate on alpine stream chemistry and water sources , 2018, Hydrological Processes.

[20]  K. Weathers,et al.  Reviews and syntheses: on the roles trees play in building and plumbing the critical zone , 2017 .

[21]  Susan L. Brantley,et al.  Controls on deep critical zone architecture: a historical review and four testable hypotheses , 2017 .

[22]  James P. McNamara,et al.  Using geophysical surveys to test tracer‐based storage estimates in headwater catchments , 2016 .

[23]  C. Riebe,et al.  Geophysical imaging reveals topographic stress control of bedrock weathering , 2015, Science.

[24]  J. McDonnell,et al.  Global separation of plant transpiration from groundwater and streamflow , 2015, Nature.

[25]  Stephen P. Good,et al.  Hydrologic connectivity constrains partitioning of global terrestrial water fluxes , 2015, Science.

[26]  J. McDonnell The two water worlds hypothesis: ecohydrological separation of water between streams and trees? , 2014 .

[27]  William E Dietrich,et al.  A bottom-up control on fresh-bedrock topography under landscapes , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[28]  J. Schooler Bridging the Objective/Subjective Divide: Towards a Meta-Perspective of Science and Experience , 2014 .

[29]  M. Lebedeva,et al.  Exploring geochemical controls on weathering and erosion of convex hillslopes: beyond the empirical regolith production function , 2013 .

[30]  S. P. Anderson,et al.  Rock damage and regolith transport by frost: an example of climate modulation of the geomorphology of the critical zone , 2013 .

[31]  J. Kirchner,et al.  Concentration–discharge relationships reflect chemostatic characteristics of US catchments , 2009 .