Protein stability imposes limits on organism complexity and speed of molecular evolution

Classical population genetics a priori assigns fitness to alleles without considering molecular or functional properties of proteins that these alleles encode. Here we study population dynamics in a model where fitness can be inferred from physical properties of proteins under a physiological assumption that loss of stability of any protein encoded by an essential gene confers a lethal phenotype. Accumulation of mutations in organisms containing Γ genes can then be represented as diffusion within the Γ-dimensional hypercube with adsorbing boundaries determined, in each dimension, by loss of a protein's stability and, at higher stability, by lack of protein sequences. Solving the diffusion equation whose parameters are derived from the data on point mutations in proteins, we determine a universal distribution of protein stabilities, in agreement with existing data. The theory provides a fundamental relation between mutation rate, maximal genome size, and thermodynamic response of proteins to point mutations. It establishes a universal speed limit on rate of molecular evolution by predicting that populations go extinct (via lethal mutagenesis) when mutation rate exceeds approximately six mutations per essential part of genome per replication for mesophilic organisms and one to two mutations per genome per replication for thermophilic ones. Several RNA viruses function close to the evolutionary speed limit, whereas error correction mechanisms used by DNA viruses and nonmutant strains of bacteria featuring various genome lengths and mutation rates have brought these organisms universally ≈1,000-fold below the natural speed limit.

[1]  M. Huynen,et al.  Neutral evolution of mutational robustness. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[2]  I. Matic,et al.  Evolution of mutation rates in bacteria , 2006, Molecular microbiology.

[3]  B. Wiedenheft,et al.  Hot crenarchaeal viruses reveal deep evolutionary connections , 2006, Nature Reviews Microbiology.

[4]  P Prabakaran,et al.  Thermodynamic databases for proteins and protein-nucleic acid interactions. , 2001, Biopolymers.

[5]  M. Karplus,et al.  How does a protein fold? , 1994, Nature.

[6]  H. Muller THE RELATION OF RECOMBINATION TO MUTATIONAL ADVANCE. , 1964, Mutation research.

[7]  S. Peng,et al.  Patients' quality of life after laparoscopic or open cholecystectomy. , 2005, Journal of Zhejiang University. Science. B.

[8]  F. Blattner,et al.  Conditional Lethal Amber Mutations in Essential Escherichia coli Genes , 2004, Journal of bacteriology.

[9]  P. Privalov,et al.  Energetics of protein structure. , 1995, Advances in protein chemistry.

[10]  J. J. Bull,et al.  Theory of Lethal Mutagenesis for Viruses , 2007, Journal of Virology.

[11]  D. Grogan,et al.  Rates of spontaneous mutation in an archaeon from geothermal environments , 1997, Journal of bacteriology.

[12]  L Serrano,et al.  Point mutations in protein globular domains: contributions from function, stability and misfolding. , 2006, Journal of molecular biology.

[13]  H. Dyson,et al.  Intrinsically unstructured proteins and their functions , 2005, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[14]  F. Arnold,et al.  Protein stability promotes evolvability. , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[15]  M. DePristo,et al.  Missense meanderings in sequence space: a biophysical view of protein evolution , 2005, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[16]  Igor N. Berezovsky,et al.  Positive and Negative Design in Stability and Thermal Adaptation of Natural Proteins , 2006, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[17]  A V Finkelstein,et al.  Rate of protein folding near the point of thermodynamic equilibrium between the coil and the most stable chain fold. , 1997, Folding & design.

[18]  E I Shakhnovich,et al.  Theory of cooperative transitions in protein molecules. I. Why denaturation of globular protein is a first‐order phase transition , 1989, Biopolymers.

[19]  Claus O Wilke,et al.  Quasispecies theory in the context of population genetics , 2005, BMC Evolutionary Biology.

[20]  Akinori Sarai,et al.  ProTherm and ProNIT: thermodynamic databases for proteins and protein–nucleic acid interactions , 2005, Nucleic Acids Res..

[21]  L. Loeb,et al.  Viral error catastrophe by mutagenic nucleosides. , 2004, Annual review of microbiology.

[22]  Ron Elber,et al.  Computational analysis of sequence selection mechanisms. , 2004, Structure.

[23]  J. Drake,et al.  Mutation rates among RNA viruses. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[24]  P. Zipperlen,et al.  Functional genomic analysis of C. elegans chromosome I by systematic RNA interference , 2000, Nature.

[25]  V. Uversky Natively unfolded proteins: A point where biology waits for physics , 2002, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[26]  P. Schuster,et al.  Self-replication with errors. A model for polynucleotide replication. , 1982, Biophysical chemistry.

[27]  P. Privalov Stability of proteins: small globular proteins. , 1979, Advances in protein chemistry.

[28]  Eugene I. Shakhnovich Protein Folding Thermodynamics and Dynamics: Where Physics, Chemistry, and Biology Meet , 2006 .

[29]  Eugene Shakhnovich,et al.  Protein folding thermodynamics and dynamics: where physics, chemistry, and biology meet. , 2006, Chemical reviews.

[30]  C. Wilke,et al.  Thermodynamics of Neutral Protein Evolution , 2006, Genetics.

[31]  M. Lynch,et al.  The mutational meltdown in asexual populations. , 1993, The Journal of heredity.

[32]  J. Gillespie The causes of molecular evolution , 1991 .

[33]  E. Shakhnovich,et al.  Influence of point mutations on protein structure: probability of a neutral mutation. , 1991, Journal of theoretical biology.

[34]  D. M. Taverna,et al.  Why are proteins marginally stable? , 2002, Proteins.

[35]  C. Cameron,et al.  RNA virus error catastrophe: Direct molecular test by using ribavirin , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[36]  E I Shakhnovich,et al.  Protein design: a perspective from simple tractable models , 1998, Folding & design.

[37]  J. Drake,et al.  The Distribution of Rates of Spontaneous Mutation over Viruses, Prokaryotes, and Eukaryotes , 1999, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.