Generalized classification modeling of activated sludge process based on microscopic image analysis

ABSTRACT The state of activated sludge wastewater treatment process (AS WWTP) is conventionally identified by physico-chemical measurements which are costly, time-consuming and have associated environmental hazards. Image processing and analysis-based linear regression modeling has been used to monitor the AS WWTP. But it is plant- and state-specific in the sense that it cannot be generalized to multiple plants and states. Generalized classification modeling for state identification is the main objective of this work. By generalized classification, we mean that the identification model does not require any prior information about the state of the plant, and the resultant identification is valid for any plant in any state. In this paper, the generalized classification model for the AS process is proposed based on features extracted using morphological parameters of flocs. The images of the AS samples, collected from aeration tanks of nine plants, are acquired through bright-field microscopy. Feature-selection is performed in context of classification using sequential feature selection and least absolute shrinkage and selection operator. A support vector machine (SVM)-based state identification strategy was proposed with a new agreement solver module for imbalanced data of the states of AS plants. The classification results were compared with state-of-the-art multiclass SVMs (one-vs.-one and one-vs.-all), and ensemble classifiers using the performance metrics: accuracy, recall, specificity, precision, F measure and kappa coefficient (κ). The proposed strategy exhibits better results by identification of different states of different plants with accuracy 0.9423, and κ 0.6681 for the minority class data of bulking.

[1]  Jouko Niinimäki,et al.  On-line optical monitoring of activated sludge floc morphology , 2015 .

[2]  Awwa,et al.  Standard Methods for the examination of water and wastewater , 1999 .

[3]  S. Pizer,et al.  The Image Processing Handbook , 1994 .

[4]  Y. Özbay,et al.  Prediction of sludge volume index bulking using image analysis and neural network at a full-scale activated sludge plant , 2016 .

[5]  Majid Bagheri,et al.  Modeling and optimization of activated sludge bulking for a real wastewater treatment plant using hybrid artificial neural networks-genetic algorithm approach , 2015 .

[6]  Humaira Nisar,et al.  Estimation of sludge volume index (SVI) using bright field activated sludge images , 2016, 2016 IEEE International Instrumentation and Measurement Technology Conference Proceedings.

[7]  Aamir Saeed Malik,et al.  Digital image processing and analysis for activated sludge wastewater treatment. , 2015, Advances in experimental medicine and biology.

[8]  Yap Vooi Voon,et al.  Application of imaging techniques for monitoring flocs in activated sludge , 2012, 2012 International Conference on Biomedical Engineering (ICoBE).

[9]  Junfei Qiao,et al.  A fuzzy neural network approach for online fault detection in waste water treatment process , 2014, Comput. Electr. Eng..

[10]  Tin Kam Ho,et al.  The Random Subspace Method for Constructing Decision Forests , 1998, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[11]  Humaira Nisar,et al.  Illumination Compensated Segmentation of Microscopic Images of Activated Sludge Flocs , 2015, 2015 International Conference on Digital Image Computing: Techniques and Applications (DICTA).

[12]  Aamir Saeed Malik,et al.  Segmentation assessment of activated sludge flocs at different magnifications for wastewater treatment , 2014, 2014 IEEE International Conference on Control System, Computing and Engineering (ICCSCE 2014).

[13]  Variations of morphology of activated sludge flocs studied at full-scale wastewater treatment plants , 2015, Environmental technology.

[14]  Ashutosh Kumar Singh,et al.  The Elements of Statistical Learning: Data Mining, Inference, and Prediction , 2010 .

[15]  I Sekoulov,et al.  Early warning-system for operation-failures in biological stages of WWTPs by on-line image analysis. , 2002, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[16]  D P Mesquita,et al.  Characterization of activated sludge abnormalities by image analysis and chemometric techniques. , 2011, Analytica chimica acta.

[17]  A. E. Greenberg,et al.  Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater : supplement to the sixteenth edition , 1988 .

[18]  A. L. Amaral,et al.  Automatic identification of activated sludge disturbances and assessment of operational parameters. , 2013, Chemosphere.

[19]  Yoav Freund,et al.  A decision-theoretic generalization of on-line learning and an application to boosting , 1995, EuroCOLT.

[20]  J. F. Van Impe,et al.  Towards on-line quantification of flocs and filaments by image analysis , 2004, Biotechnology Letters.

[21]  Eugénio C. Ferreira,et al.  Estimation of effluent quality parameters from an activated sludge system using quantitative image analysis , 2016 .

[22]  Taghi M. Khoshgoftaar,et al.  RUSBoost: Improving classification performance when training data is skewed , 2008, 2008 19th International Conference on Pattern Recognition.

[23]  A. L. Amarala,et al.  Activated sludge monitoring of a wastewater treatment plant using image analysis and partial least squares regression , 2005 .

[24]  Elisavet Amanatidou,et al.  Influence of wastewater treatment plants' operational conditions on activated sludge microbiological and morphological characteristics , 2016, Environmental technology.

[25]  J Niinimäki,et al.  Optical monitoring of activated sludge flocs in bulking and non-bulking conditions , 2013, Environmental technology.

[26]  M. Obert NUMERICAL ESTIMATES OF THE FRACTAL DIMENSION D AND THE LACUNARITY L BY THE MASS RADIUS RELATION , 1993 .

[27]  Wilhelm Burger,et al.  Digital Image Processing - An Algorithmic Introduction using Java , 2008, Texts in Computer Science.

[28]  Maria Alice Zarur Coelho,et al.  Activated sludge morphology characterization through an image analysis procedure , 2006 .

[29]  W A Taber,et al.  Wastewater microbiology. , 1976, Annual review of microbiology.

[30]  Ying Li,et al.  A soft computing method to predict sludge volume index based on a recurrent self-organizing neural network , 2016, Appl. Soft Comput..

[31]  Leo Breiman,et al.  Random Forests , 2001, Machine Learning.

[32]  G. Daigger,et al.  Manual on the Causes and Control of Activated Sludge Bulking, Foaming, and Other Solids Separation Problems , 2017 .

[33]  B. Smolka,et al.  Feature analysis of activated sludge based on microscopic images , 2001, Canadian Conference on Electrical and Computer Engineering 2001. Conference Proceedings (Cat. No.01TH8555).

[34]  A. L. Amaral,et al.  Monitoring of activated sludge settling ability through image analysis: validation on full-scale wastewater treatment plants , 2009, Bioprocess and biosystems engineering.

[35]  J. Niinimäki,et al.  A comparison between floc morphology and the effluent clarity at a full-scale activated sludge plant using optical monitoring , 2014, Environmental technology.

[36]  Esko Juuso,et al.  Real-time optical monitoring of the wastewater treatment process , 2016, Environmental technology.

[37]  Humaira Nisar,et al.  Local adaptive approach toward segmentation of microscopic images of activated sludge flocs , 2015, J. Electronic Imaging.

[38]  A. L. Amaral,et al.  Activated sludge characterization through microscopy: a review on quantitative image analysis and chemometric techniques. , 2013, Analytica chimica acta.