An Identification Key for Selecting Methods for Sustainability Assessments

Sustainability assessments can play an important role in decision making. This role starts with selecting appropriate methods for a given situation. We observed that scientists, consultants, and decision-makers often do not systematically perform a problem analyses that guides the choice of the method, partly related to a lack of systematic, though sufficiently versatile approaches to do so. Therefore, we developed and propose a new step towards method selection on the basis of question articulation: the Sustainability Assessment Identification Key. The identification key was designed to lead its user through all important choices needed for comprehensive question articulation. Subsequently, methods that fit the resulting specific questions are suggested by the key. The key consists of five domains, of which three determine method selection and two the design or use of the method. Each domain consists of four or more criteria that need specification. For example in the domain “system boundaries”, amongst others, the spatial and temporal scales are specified. The key was tested (retrospectively) on a set of thirty case studies. Using the key appeared to contribute to improved: (i) transparency in the link between the question and method selection; (ii) consistency between questions asked and answers provided; and (iii) internal consistency in methodological design. There is latitude to develop the current initial key further, not only for selecting methods pertinent to a problem definition, but also as a principle for associated opportunities such as stakeholder identification.

[1]  Lennart Olsson,et al.  Categorising tools for sustainability assessment , 2007 .

[2]  John Turnpenny,et al.  A FRAMEWORK FOR TOOL SELECTION AND USE IN INTEGRATED ASSESSMENT FOR SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT , 2007 .

[3]  Enver Doruk Özdemir,et al.  A confusion of tongues or the art of aggregating indicators—Reflections on four projective methodologies on sustainability measurement , 2011 .

[4]  Jan Muntermann,et al.  A method for taxonomy development and its application in information systems , 2013, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[5]  A. van der Veen,et al.  SustainabilityA-Test inception report. Progress to date and future tasks , 2005 .

[6]  Angus Morrison-Saunders,et al.  Re-evaluating sustainability assessment: Aligning the vision and the practice , 2011 .

[7]  Rudolf de Groot,et al.  Framing environmental indicators: moving from causal chains to causal networks , 2008 .

[8]  Rebecca Green,et al.  Typologies and taxonomies: An introduction to classification techniques , 1996 .

[9]  László Pintér,et al.  Bellagio STAMP: Principles for sustainability assessment and measurement , 2012 .

[10]  Reinout Heijungs,et al.  Similarities, Differences and Synergisms Between HERA and LCA—An Analysis at Three Levels , 2006 .

[11]  Angus Morrison-Saunders,et al.  Conceptualising sustainability assessment , 2004 .

[12]  M. Huijbregts,et al.  Value Choices in Life Cycle Impact Assessment of Stressors Causing Human Health Damage , 2011 .

[13]  Alessandra Zamagni,et al.  Progress in sustainability science: lessons learnt from current methodologies for sustainability assessment: Part 1 , 2013, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[14]  Alessandra Zamagni,et al.  Life cycle sustainability assessment in the context of sustainability science progress (part 2) , 2013, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[15]  Adisa Azapagic,et al.  Options for broadening and deepening the LCA approaches , 2010 .

[16]  A. Gasparatosa,et al.  Choosing the most appropriate sustainability assessment tool , 2012 .

[17]  Rudolf de Groot,et al.  A conceptual framework for selecting environmental indicator sets , 2008 .

[18]  Peter Guthrie,et al.  A framework for clarifying the meaning of Triple Bottom-Line, Integrated, and Sustainability Assessment , 2008 .

[19]  Simon L. Kendal,et al.  An introduction to knowledge engineering , 2007 .

[20]  A. Verbruggen,et al.  Sustainability assessment and indicators: Tools in a decision-making strategy for sustainable development , 2014 .

[21]  Martin K. van Ittersum,et al.  Selecting the sharpest tools to explore the food-feed-fuel debate: Sustainability assessment of family farmers producing food, feed and fuel in Brazil , 2012 .

[22]  Matthias Finkbeiner,et al.  Towards life cycle sustainability assessment: an implementation to photovoltaic modules , 2012, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[23]  Audrey L Mayer,et al.  Strengths and weaknesses of common sustainability indices for multidimensional systems. , 2008, Environment international.

[24]  Robert Joumard Environmental sustainability assessments: towards a new framework , 2011 .

[25]  Adisa Azapagic,et al.  Assessing the sustainability of Best Available Techniques (BAT): Methodology and application in the ceramic tiles industry , 2013 .

[26]  Göran Finnveden,et al.  Environmental systems analysis tools – an overview , 2005 .

[27]  Christoph Böhringer,et al.  Measuring the Immeasurable: A Survey of Sustainability Indices , 2007 .

[28]  A. Hoekstra,et al.  Humanity’s unsustainable environmental footprint , 2014, Science.

[29]  R. Kates,et al.  Characterizing and measuring sustainable development , 2003 .

[30]  Dale S. Rothman,et al.  Discursive biases of the environmental research framework DPSIR , 2008 .

[31]  Bruno Colomb,et al.  A guide for choosing the most appropriate method for multi-criteria assessment of agricultural systems according to decision-makers’ expectations , 2013 .

[32]  Isabella Peters,et al.  Folksonomies - Indexing and Retrieval in Web 2.0 , 2009, Knowledge and Information.

[33]  Walter Klöpffer,et al.  Analytical tools for environmental design and management in a systems perspective , 2012 .

[34]  Peter Smith,et al.  An introduction to knowledge engineering , 1996 .

[35]  Diego Rosso,et al.  Impact of direct greenhouse gas emissions on the carbon footprint of water reclamation processes employing nitrification-denitrification. , 2015, The Science of the total environment.

[36]  Saurabh Gupta,et al.  An overview of sustainability assessment methodologies , 2009 .

[37]  M. El-Haram,et al.  A critical review of reductionist approaches for assessing the progress towards sustainability , 2008 .

[38]  A. Scolobig,et al.  Choosing the most appropriate sustainability assessment tool , 2012 .

[39]  Teresa M. Mata,et al.  Lca Tool for Sustainability Evaluations in the Pharmaceutical Industry , 2012 .

[40]  Peter Nijkamp,et al.  A meta-framework for sustainability assessment , 2013 .

[41]  John Whyte,et al.  Treatment taxonomy for rehabilitation: past, present, and prospects. , 2014, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[42]  Claudia R. Binder,et al.  Considering the normative, systemic and procedural dimensions in indicator-based sustainability assessments in agriculture , 2010 .

[43]  Martin Kumar Patel,et al.  A Novel Methodology for the Sustainability Impact Assessment of New Technologies , 2013 .

[44]  Kees Zoeteman,et al.  Sustainability of Nations , 2001 .

[45]  Bo Pedersen Weidema,et al.  Commission Recommendation on the use ofcommon methods to measure and communicate the life cycle environmental performanceof products and organisations , 2013 .

[46]  Ruediger Kuehr,et al.  Strategic sustainable development — selection, design and synergies of applied tools , 2002 .

[47]  Simon Dietz,et al.  Weak and Strong Sustainability in the SEEA: Concepts and Measurement , 2007 .

[48]  Steven Van Passel,et al.  Multilevel and multi-user sustainability assessment of farming systems , 2012 .

[49]  Robert Ries,et al.  Environmental decision making in multi-stakeholder contexts: applicability of life cycle thinking in development planning and implementation , 2009 .

[50]  Bernadette O’Regan,et al.  Comparison of energy flow accounting, energy flow metabolism ratio analysis and ecological footprinting as tools for measuring urban sustainability: A case-study of an Irish city-region , 2012 .