The dependence of the elastic properties of osteoporotic cancellous bone on volume fraction and fabric.

Osteoporosis is a progressive systemic skeletal condition characterized by low bone mass and microarchitectural deterioration, with a consequent increase in susceptibility to fracture. Hence, osteoporosis would be best diagnosed by in vivo measurements of bone strength. As this is not clinically feasible, our goal is to estimate bone strength through the assessment of elastic properties, which are highly correlated to strength. Previously established relations between morphological parameters (volume fraction and fabric) and elastic constants could be applied to estimate cancellous bone stiffness in vivo. However, these relations were determined for normal cancellous bone. Cancellous bone from osteoporotic patients may require different relations. In this study we set out to answer two questions. First, can the elastic properties of osteoporotic cancellous bone be estimated from morphological parameters? Second, do the relations between morphological parameters and elastic constants, determined for normal bone, apply to osteoporotic bone as well? To answer these questions we used cancellous bone cubes from femoral heads of patients with (n=26) and without (n=32) hip fractures. The elastic properties of the cubes were determined using micro-finite element analysis, assuming equal tissue moduli for all specimens. The morphological parameters were determined using microcomputed tomography. Our results showed that, for equal tissue properties, the elastic properties of cancellous bone from fracture patients could indeed be estimated from morphological parameters. The morphology-based relations used to estimate the elastic properties of cancellous bone are not different for women with or without fractures.

[1]  P. Rüegsegger,et al.  Finite element analysis of trabecular bone structure: a comparison of image-based meshing techniques. , 1998, Journal of biomechanics.

[2]  W. J. Whitehouse The quantitative morphology of anisotropic trabecular bone , 1974, Journal of microscopy.

[3]  S A Goldstein,et al.  The relationship between the structural and orthogonal compressive properties of trabecular bone. , 1994, Journal of biomechanics.

[4]  J. Currey,et al.  Separate effects of osteoporosis and density on the strength and stiffness of human cancellous bone. , 1993, Clinical biomechanics.

[5]  W C Hayes,et al.  Differences between the tensile and compressive strengths of bovine tibial trabecular bone depend on modulus. , 1994, Journal of biomechanics.

[6]  A. Boyde,et al.  DISORDERS OF BONE AND FRACTURE OF THE FEMORAL NECK Evaluation of Computer Image Analysis in Diagnosis , 1976, The Lancet.

[7]  W. Ambrosius,et al.  Trabecular bone volume and microdamage accumulation in the femoral heads of women with and without femoral neck fractures. , 1997, Bone.

[8]  P Rüegsegger,et al.  Introduction and evaluation of a gray-value voxel conversion technique. , 2001, Journal of biomechanics.

[9]  J. Laidlaw,et al.  ISONIAZID TREATMENT OF BOVINE TUBERCULOSIS. , 1964, Lancet.

[10]  S. Majumdar,et al.  Magnetic resonance imaging of trabecular bone structure in the distal radius: Relationship with X-ray tomographic microscopy and biomechanics , 2005, Osteoporosis International.

[11]  W H Harris,et al.  Limitations of the continuum assumption in cancellous bone. , 1988, Journal of biomechanics.

[12]  A Odgaard,et al.  Three-dimensional methods for quantification of cancellous bone architecture. , 1997, Bone.

[13]  S. H. Kan,et al.  Epidemiology of vertebral fractures in women. , 1989, American journal of epidemiology.

[14]  J. Kinney,et al.  Numerical errors and uncertainties in finite-element modeling of trabecular bone. , 1998, Journal of biomechanics.

[15]  K L White,et al.  Technology and health care. , 1972, The New England journal of medicine.

[16]  H Weinans,et al.  Cancellous bone mechanical properties from normals and patients with hip fractures differ on the structure level, not on the bone hard tissue level. , 2002, Bone.

[17]  S. Goldstein,et al.  Evaluation of a microcomputed tomography system to study trabecular bone structure , 1990, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[18]  Claus Christiansen,et al.  Consensus development conference: Prophylaxis and treatment of osteoporosis , 2005, Osteoporosis International.

[19]  S. Majumdar,et al.  Correlation of Trabecular Bone Structure with Age, Bone Mineral Density, and Osteoporotic Status: In Vivo Studies in the Distal Radius Using High Resolution Magnetic Resonance Imaging , 1997, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[20]  R. Huiskes,et al.  Relationships between bone morphology and bone elastic properties can be accurately quantified using high‐resolution computer reconstructions , 1998, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[21]  P Rüegsegger,et al.  Resolution dependency of microstructural properties of cancellous bone based on three-dimensional mu-tomography. , 1996, Technology and health care : official journal of the European Society for Engineering and Medicine.

[22]  P. Rüegsegger,et al.  In vivo high resolution 3D-QCT of the human forearm. , 1998, Technology and health care : official journal of the European Society for Engineering and Medicine.

[23]  S. Majumdar,et al.  Impact of spatial resolution on the prediction of trabecular architecture parameters. , 1998, Bone.

[24]  S. Goldstein,et al.  Variations in Three‐Dimensional Cancellous Bone Architecture of the Proximal Femur in Female Hip Fractures and in Controls , 2000, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[25]  B. Mccreadie Structural and material changes in osteoporosis: Their impact on the mechanical environment of the osteocyte. , 2000 .

[26]  S. Goldstein,et al.  The direct examination of three‐dimensional bone architecture in vitro by computed tomography , 1989, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[27]  S C Cowin,et al.  The fabric dependence of the orthotropic elastic constants of cancellous bone. , 1990, Journal of biomechanics.

[28]  D P Fyhrie,et al.  Human vertebral body apparent and hard tissue stiffness. , 1998, Journal of biomechanics.

[29]  R. Aspden,et al.  Composition and Mechanical Properties of Cancellous Bone from the Femoral Head of Patients with Osteoporosis or Osteoarthritis , 1997, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[30]  L. Gibson The mechanical behaviour of cancellous bone. , 1985, Journal of biomechanics.

[31]  R. Huiskes,et al.  Constitutive relationships of fabric, density, and elastic properties in cancellous bone architecture. , 1999, Bone.

[32]  R Huiskes,et al.  The role of an effective isotropic tissue modulus in the elastic properties of cancellous bone. , 1999, Journal of biomechanics.