Item-Based Acquisition of Dislocation in Early Child French

This study tests whether the usage-based concept of item-based schema can explain the development of constructions other than verb-argument constructions (VACs). Through a corpus study of 600 dislocations produced by two French children between age 1;7.12 and 2;5.11, and 600 from their input, we show that the concept of item-based schemas can indeed be extended to other types of constructions. We also show that the earliest item-based schemas produced by children are similar to specific syntactic featuress of dislocations in their input, and that the dislocations produced by the adults of our corpus can also be described in terms of item-based schemas. Based on these results, we make the hypothesis that the dislocations of adults may not necessarily be produced based on a more abstract construction, and that the radical exemplar model developed by Ambridge (2019) could also explain our data.

[1]  K. Lambrecht.  On the status of SVO sentences in French discourse , 1987 .

[2]  M. Tomasello.  First Steps toward a Usage-Based Theory of Language Acquisition , 2001 .

[3]  Analyse pragmatico-discursive des SN disloqués à droite du français parlé , 2016 .

[4]  A. Ferdinand.  The Development of Phrase Structure in Child French , 1997 .

[5]  C. D. Cat.  Experimental Evidence for Preschoolers' Mastery of "Topic" , 2009 .

[6]  Devin M. Casenhiser,et al.  The role of prediction in construction-learning , 2005, Journal of Child Language.

[7]  Knud Lambrecht,et al.  Information structure and sentence form , 1994 .

[8]  Katherine Demuth,et al.  Prosodically-conditioned variability in children's production of French determiners* , 2008, Journal of Child Language.

[9]  C. Rowland,et al.  The acquisition of questions with long-distance dependencies , 2009 .

[10]  Michael Tomasello,et al.  A Construction Based Analysis of Child Directed Speech. , 2003 .

[11]  Joan L. Bybee,et al.  From Usage to Grammar: The Mind's Response to Repetition , 2007 .

[12]  Alison Wray.  Identifying formulaic language: persistent challenges and new opportunities , 2009 .

[13]  H. Andersen.  Anmeldelse af: Mylène Blasco-Dulbecco: Les dislocations en français contemporain, Etude syntaxique. Paris, Honoré Champion 1999 , 2002 .

[14]  Colin Bannard,et al.  Stored Word Sequences in Language Learning , 2008, Psychological science.

[15]  M. Tomasello,et al.  Early syntactic creativity: a usage-based approach. , 2003, Journal of child language.

[16]  William Croft,et al.  Radical Construction Grammar: Syntactic Theory in Typological Perspective , 2001 .

[17]  A. Goldberg.  Constructions: A Construction Grammar Approach to Argument Structure , 1995 .

[18]  Les îlots verbaux dans les dislocations chez l’enfant français , 2018 .

[19]  Morten H. Christiansen,et al.  The Role of Multiword Building Blocks in Explaining L1-L2 Differences , 2017, Top. Cogn. Sci..

[20]  Nick C. Ellis,et al.  Thinking About Multiword Constructions: Usage-Based Approaches to Acquisition and Processing , 2017, Top. Cogn. Sci..

[21]  Fernand Gobet,et al.  Simulating the cross-linguistic pattern of Optional Infinitive errors in children’s declaratives and Wh- questions , 2015, Cognition.

[22]  Adele E. Goldberg,et al.  Support from processing for a constructional approach to grammar , 2005 .

[23]  Inbal Arnon,et al.  Why Brush Your Teeth Is Better Than Teeth – Children's Word Production Is Facilitated in Familiar Sentence-Frames , 2011 .

[24]  Morten H. Christiansen,et al.  Processing of relative clauses is made easier by frequency of occurrence , 2007 .

[25]  Adele E. Goldberg,et al.  Learning argument structure generalizations , 2004 .

[26]  M. Avanzi,et al.  Is there a prosodic difference between left-dislocated and heavy subjects? evidence from spontaneous French , 2010, Speech Prosody 2010.

[27]  William D. Raymond,et al.  Probabilistic Relations between Words: Evidence from Reduction in Lexical Production , 2008 .

[28]  Ewa Dąbrowska,et al.  Towards a lexically specific grammar of children’s question constructions , 2005 .

[29]  A. Goldberg.  Constructions at Work: The Nature of Generalization in Language , 2006 .

[30]  Ewa Dabrowska,et al.  From formula to schema: The acquisition of English questions , 2001 .

[31]  T. Reinhart.  Pragmatics and Linguistics: an analysis of Sentence Topics , 1981, Philosophica.

[32]  J. Pine,et al.  Lexically-based learning and early grammatical development , 1997, Journal of Child Language.

[33]  B. Erman,et al.  The idiom principle and the open choice principle , 2000 .

[34]  Edward Kako,et al.  The semantics of syntactic frames , 2006 .

[35]  G. Zipf.  The Psycho-Biology Of Language: AN INTRODUCTION TO DYNAMIC PHILOLOGY , 1999 .

[36]  J. Pine,et al.  Individual differences in early vocabulary development: redefining the referential-expressive distinction , 1992, Journal of Child Language.

[37]  M. Labelle,et al.  The status of post-verbal subjects in French child language , 1994 .

[38]  Manfred Krifka,et al.  Basic notions of information structure , 2008 .

[39]  B. Ambridge.  Against stored abstractions: A radical exemplar model of language acquisition , 2020, First Language.

[40]  Christophe Parisse,et al.  Left-dislocated subjects: A construction typical of young French-speaking children? , 2008 .

[41]  A. Belletti,et al.  Topics and passives in Italian-speaking children and adults , 2018, Language Acquisition.

[42]  Cécile De Cat,et al.  French Dislocation: Interpretation, Syntax, Acquisition , 2007 .

[43]  Devin M. Casenhiser,et al.  Fast mapping between a phrasal form and meaning. , 2005, Developmental science.

[44]  B. MacWhinney,et al.  The Child Language Data Exchange System: an update , 1990, Journal of Child Language.

[45]  Knud Lambrecht,et al.  Topic, Antitopic and Verb Agreement in Non-Standard French , 1981 .