Multiple-focal-planes 3D displays: A practical solution to the vergence-accommodation conflict?

The vergence-accommodation conflict in conventional stereo displays causes poor stereoscopic performance and observer discomfort. We examined the effectiveness of multiple-focal-plane displays in overcoming these issues. Specifically, we examined a technique referred to as `depth filtering', in which continuous variations in focal distance are approximated by distributing image intensity across several image planes [1]. A key potential advantage of this technique is that focal distance can be sampled adequately with relatively few, widely spaced focal planes. We examined this by measuring (i) stereoacuity, and (ii) the time needed for stereoscopic fusion, as a function of image-plane separation. Stereo fusion time for depth-filtered and real targets was similar. Stereoacuity for depth-filtered stimuli with image-plane separations <;0.7 diopters (D) was only slightly poorer than for real targets, but deteriorated more rapidly at larger plane separations. The results are encouraging for multi-plane displays, suggesting that a display with just five image planes, 0.6 D apart, could cover the range 42 cm to infinity.

[1]  Martin S. Banks,et al.  Creating effective focus cues in multi-plane 3D displays , 2011, Optics express.

[2]  Myron W. Krueger,et al.  Dynamic focusing in head-mounted displays , 1999, Electronic Imaging.

[3]  P. A. Ward,et al.  Modulation dependence of the accommodation response to sinusoidal gratings , 1986, Vision Research.

[4]  E F FINCHAM,et al.  The reciprocal actions of accommodation and convergence , 1957, The Journal of physiology.

[5]  M. Ernst,et al.  Focus cues affect perceived depth. , 2005, Journal of vision.

[6]  Martin S. Banks,et al.  A stereo display prototype with multiple focal distances , 2004, SIGGRAPH 2004.

[7]  I. Howard,et al.  Seeing in depth, Vol. 2: Depth perception. , 2002 .

[8]  S. McKee,et al.  A contrast ratio constraint on stereo matching , 1995, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[9]  Kevin J. MacKenzie,et al.  Accommodation to multiple-focal-plane displays: Implications for improving stereoscopic displays and for accommodation control. , 2010, Journal of vision.

[10]  Campbell Fw.  A method for measuring the depth of field of the human eye. , 1954 .

[11]  D G Pelli,et al.  The VideoToolbox software for visual psychophysics: transforming numbers into movies. , 1997, Spatial vision.

[12]  David M. Hoffman,et al.  Vergence-accommodation conflicts hinder visual performance and cause visual fatigue. , 2008, Journal of vision.

[13]  K Simons.  Effects on stereopsis of monocular versus binocular degradation of image contrast. , 1984, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[14]  Philip B. Kruger,et al.  Spatiotemporal transfer function of human accommodation , 1994, Vision Research.

[15]  Martin S. Banks,et al.  Are corresponding points fixed? , 2001, Vision Research.

[16]  James Gao,et al.  High-speed switchable lens enables the development of a volumetric stereoscopic display. , 2009, Optics express.

[17]  Gordon E. Legge,et al.  Stereopsis and contrast , 1989, Vision Research.

[18]  Felix Wichmann,et al.  The psychometric function: II. Bootstrap-based confidence intervals and sampling , 2001, Perception & psychophysics.

[19]  F A Wichmann,et al.  Ning for Helpful Comments and Suggestions. This Paper Benefited Con- Siderably from Conscientious Peer Review, and We Thank Our Reviewers the Psychometric Function: I. Fitting, Sampling, and Goodness of Fit , 2001 .

[20]  K N OGLE,et al.  Observations on accommodative convergence; especially its nonlinear relationships. , 1959, American journal of ophthalmology.

[21]  Kevin J. MacKenzie,et al.  Vergence and accommodation to multiple-image-plane stereoscopic displays: "real world" responses with practical image-plane separations? , 2012, J. Electronic Imaging.

[22]  Sheng Liu,et al.  An optical see-through head mounted display with addressable focal planes , 2008, 2008 7th IEEE/ACM International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality.

[23]  F. Campbell,et al.  A method for measuring the depth of field of the human eye. , 1957, The Journal of physiology.

[24]  D. A. Owens.  A comparison of accommodative responsiveness and contrast sensitivity for sinusoidal gratings , 1980, Vision Research.

[25]  D H Brainard,et al.  The Psychophysics Toolbox. , 1997, Spatial vision.

[26]  P. Ward,et al.  THE EFFECT OF SPATIAL FREQUENCY ON STEADY‐STATE ACCOMMODATION , 1987, Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians.