Effect of Pore‐Wall Roughness and Péclet Number on Conservative Solute Transport in Saturated Porous Media

While modeling solute transport has been an active subject of research in the past few decades, the influence of pore‐wall roughness on contaminant migration has not yet been addressed. We therefore conduct particle tracking simulations in three porous domains that have different pore‐wall roughness characteristics. Specifically, we consider five surface fractal dimensions ds = 1.0, 1.1, 1.2, 1.4, and 1.6, and four different Péclet numbers Pe = 10, 102, 103, and 105. Overall, arrival time distributions are simulated for 60 scenarios (3 domains × $\times $ 5 surface fractal dimensions × $\times $ 4 Péclet numbers) some of which show heavy‐tailed patterns indicating non‐Fickian transport. To interpret the simulations and quantify the transport behavior, we analyze the resulting arrival time distributions by the continuous time random walk (CTRW) approach. Results show that, on average, as the surface fractal dimension increases from 1.0 to 1.6, the CTRW model parameters β $\beta $ , an exponent showing the degree of anomalous transport, v, the average solute velocity, and t2, the cut‐off time to Fickian transport, remain nearly constant. However, the dispersion coefficient, D, increases and the characteristic transition time, t1, decreases. We found t1 and D are more sensitive to pore‐wall roughness compared to the other CTRW parameters. We also found that as the Péclet number increases from 10 to 105, on average, v and D increase, t1 and β $\beta $ decrease, and t2 remains nearly constant. The simulations demonstrate that the exponent β $\beta $ and the dispersion coefficient are correlated to the average solute velocity.

[1]  B. Berkowitz,et al.  Process-Dependent Solute Transport in Porous Media , 2021, Transport in Porous Media.

[2]  M. Dentz,et al.  Pore-scale Transport in Rocks of Different Complexity Modeled by Random Walk Methods , 2021, Transport in Porous Media.

[3]  M. Zhang,et al.  Effect of slippery boundary on solute transport in rough-walled rock fractures under different flow regimes , 2021, Journal of Hydrology.

[4]  Y. Edery The Effect of varying correlation lengths on Anomalous Transport , 2021, Transport in Porous Media.

[5]  M. Dentz,et al.  Pore-Scale Mixing and the Evolution of Hydrodynamic Dispersion in Porous Media. , 2021, Physical review letters.

[6]  V. Cnudde,et al.  Large-scale pore network and continuum simulations of solute longitudinal dispersivity of a saturated sand column , 2020 .

[7]  B. Berkowitz,et al.  Modeling Non‐Fickian Solute Transport Due to Mass Transfer and Physical Heterogeneity on Arbitrary Groundwater Velocity Fields , 2020, Water Resources Research.

[8]  B. Berkowitz,et al.  Anomalous transport dependence on Péclet number, porous medium heterogeneity, and a temporally varying velocity field. , 2019, Physical review. E.

[9]  Zhangxin Chen,et al.  Shear Dispersion in a Rough-Walled Fracture , 2018 .

[10]  B. Ghanbarian,et al.  Three-Dimensional Lattice Boltzmann Simulations of Single-Phase Permeability in Random Fractal Porous Media with Rough Pore–Solid Interface , 2018, Transport in Porous Media.

[11]  B. Berkowitz,et al.  Inertial Effects on Flow and Transport in Heterogeneous Porous Media. , 2017, Physical review letters.

[12]  Hamdi A. Tchelepi,et al.  Minimum requirements for predictive pore-network modeling of solute transport in micromodels , 2017 .

[13]  V. Joekar‐Niasar,et al.  Hydro-dynamic Solute Transport under Two-Phase Flow Conditions , 2017, Scientific Reports.

[14]  Vladimir Cvetkovic,et al.  Modeling of Solute Transport in a 3D Rough-Walled Fracture–Matrix System , 2017, Transport in Porous Media.

[15]  Vahid Joekar-Niasar,et al.  A transport phase diagram for pore-level correlated porous media , 2016 .

[16]  Matthew T. Balhoff,et al.  Eulerian network modeling of longitudinal dispersion , 2015 .

[17]  Matthew T. Balhoff,et al.  A streamline splitting pore‐network approach for computationally inexpensive and accurate simulation of transport in porous media , 2014 .

[18]  Alberto Guadagnini,et al.  Origins of anomalous transport in heterogeneous media: Structural and dynamic controls , 2014 .

[19]  M. Cardenas,et al.  Non‐Fickian transport through two‐dimensional rough fractures: Assessment and prediction , 2014 .

[20]  Peyman Mostaghimi,et al.  Insights into non-Fickian solute transport in carbonates , 2013, Water resources research.

[21]  J. Fitts,et al.  Modifications of Carbonate Fracture Hydrodynamic Properties by CO 2 -Acidified Brine Flow , 2013 .

[22]  P. Grindrod,et al.  Application of Fractals to Soil Properties, Landscape Patterns, and Solute Transport in Porous Media , 2013 .

[23]  Kuldeep Chaudhary,et al.  Pore geometry effects on intrapore viscous to inertial flows and on effective hydraulic parameters , 2013 .

[24]  John R. Nimmo,et al.  POROSITY AND PORE-SIZE DISTRIBUTION , 2013 .

[25]  A. Hunt,et al.  Saturation dependence of dispersion in porous media. , 2012, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[26]  Peyman Mostaghimi,et al.  Signature of non-Fickian solute transport in complex heterogeneous porous media. , 2011, Physical review letters.

[27]  Mohammad Piri,et al.  Pore-scale modeling of dispersion in disordered porous media. , 2011, Journal of contaminant hydrology.

[28]  S. Geiger,et al.  Upscaling solute transport in naturally fractured porous media with the continuous time random walk method , 2009 .

[29]  Yongping Chen,et al.  Role of surface roughness characterized by fractal geometry on laminar flow in microchannels. , 2009, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[30]  Brian Berkowitz,et al.  Exploring the nature of non-Fickian transport in laboratory experiments , 2009 .

[31]  W.,et al.  A Critical Review of Data on Field-Scale Dispersion in Aquifers , 2009 .

[32]  M. Bayani Cardenas,et al.  Three‐dimensional vortices in single pores and their effects on transport , 2008 .

[33]  Martin J. Blunt,et al.  Pore‐scale modeling of transverse dispersion in porous media , 2007 .

[34]  M. Dentz,et al.  Modeling non‐Fickian transport in geological formations as a continuous time random walk , 2006 .

[35]  Marcel G. Schaap,et al.  Percolation Theory for Flow in Porous Media , 2006 .

[36]  Martin J. Blunt,et al.  Pore‐scale modeling and continuous time random walk analysis of dispersion in porous media , 2006 .

[37]  Brian Berkowitz,et al.  Computing “Anomalous” Contaminant Transport in Porous Media: The CTRW MATLAB Toolbox , 2005, Ground water.

[38]  Fawang Liu,et al.  Similarity solutions for solute transport in fractal porous media using a time- and scale-dependent dispersivity , 2005 .

[39]  B. Berkowitz,et al.  Anomalous Transport in “Classical” Soil and Sand Columns , 2004, Soil Science Society of America Journal.

[40]  Martin J. Blunt,et al.  Pore‐scale modeling of longitudinal dispersion , 2004 .

[41]  Brian Berkowitz,et al.  Time behavior of solute transport in heterogeneous media: transition from anomalous to normal transport , 2003 .

[42]  B Berkowitz,et al.  Application of Continuous Time Random Walk Theory to Tracer Test Measurements in Fractured and Heterogeneous Porous Media , 2001, Ground water.

[43]  B Berkowitz,et al.  Analysis of field observations of tracer transport in a fractured till. , 2001, Journal of contaminant hydrology.

[44]  Brian Berkowitz,et al.  Application of Continuous Time Random Walks to Transport in Porous Media , 2000 .

[45]  Hans-Jörg Vogel,et al.  A numerical experiment on pore size, pore connectivity, water retention, permeability, and solute transport using network models , 2000 .

[46]  T.-C. Jim Yeh,et al.  The effect of water content on solute transport in unsaturated porous media , 1999 .

[47]  S. Wheatcraft,et al.  Macrodispersivity Tensor for Nonreactive Solute Transport in Isotropic and Anisotropic Fractal Porous Media: Analytical Solutions , 1996 .

[48]  A. Binley,et al.  Examination of Solute Transport in an Undisturbed Soil Column Using Electrical Resistance Tomography , 1996 .

[49]  Aldo Fiori,et al.  Finite Peclet Extensions of Dagan's Solutions to Transport in Anisotropic Heterogeneous Formations , 1996 .

[50]  R. A. Greenkorn,et al.  An experimental investigation of dispersion in layered porous media , 1994 .

[51]  M. Sahimi Flow phenomena in rocks : from continuum models to fractals, percolation, cellular automata, and simulated annealing , 1993 .

[52]  Stephen R. Brown,et al.  The effect of anisotropic surface roughness on flow and transport in fractures , 1991 .

[53]  M. E. Thompson Numerical simulation of solute transport in rough fractures , 1991 .

[54]  S. Wheatcraft,et al.  Fluid Flow and Solute Transport in Fractal Heterogeneous Porous Media , 1991 .

[55]  W. Jury,et al.  A laboratory study of the dispersion scale effect in column outflow experiments , 1990 .

[56]  Scott W. Tyler,et al.  An explanation of scale‐dependent dispersivity in heterogeneous aquifers using concepts of fractal geometry , 1988 .

[57]  E. Sudicky A natural gradient experiment on solute transport in a sand aquifer: Spatial variability of hydraulic conductivity and its role in the dispersion process , 1986 .

[58]  F. De Smedt,et al.  Study of tracer movement through unsaturated sand , 1986 .

[59]  E. Montroll,et al.  Anomalous transit-time dispersion in amorphous solids , 1975 .

[60]  Elliott W. Montroll,et al.  Random walks on lattices. IV. Continuous-time walks and influence of absorbing boundaries , 1973 .

[61]  E. Montroll Random walks on lattices , 1969 .

[62]  E. Montroll,et al.  Random Walks on Lattices. II , 1965 .