Subsidiary importance in the MNC: What role does internal embeddedness play?

This paper addresses the issue of how a subsidiary's internal and external embeddedness interact in generating the importance of the subsidiary vis-a-vis the MNC as a whole. We take previous findings of the positive impact of external embeddedness on a subsidiary's importance as our starting point and consider two questions: (a) how does the internal embeddedness of a subsidiary affect its organisational importance, and (b) how do a subsidiary's internal and external embeddedness interact in generating organisational importance? We test hypotheses reflecting these questions on data from 97 foreign subsidiaries belonging to Swedish multinationals. We find that internal embeddedness is negatively related to a subsidiary's importance to product development but unrelated to its importance to production development. We also find that internal embeddedness dilutes the positive impact of external embeddedness on a subsidiary's importance to production development. We discuss the findings in the light of the extant literature and consider implications for future research and MNC managers.

[1]  A. Zaheer,et al.  Bridging ties: a source of firm heterogeneity in competitive capabilities , 1999 .

[2]  Julian Birkinshaw,et al.  Knowledge Flows Within Multinational Corporations: Explaining Subsidiary Isolation and Its Performance Implications , 2008, Organ. Sci..

[3]  A. Spadavecchia.  Managing the embedded multinational: a business network view , 2009 .

[4]  Yadong Luo,et al.  Guanxi and organizational dynamics: organizational networking in Chinese firms , 2001 .

[5]  J. Birkinshaw.  How Multinational Subsidiary Mandates are Gained and Lost , 1996 .

[6]  P. Ghauri,et al.  Managing opportunity development in business networks , 2005 .

[7]  J. W. Medcof.  Resource‐based strategy and managerial power in networks of internationally dispersed technology units , 2001 .

[8]  J. Pfeffer,et al.  An examination of need-satisfaction models of job attitudes. , 1977 .

[9]  P. M. Podsakoff,et al.  Self-Reports in Organizational Research: Problems and Prospects , 1986 .

[10]  R. Coase.  The Nature of the Firm , 1937 .

[11]  C. K. Prahalad,et al.  THE DOMINANT LOGIC: RETROSPECTIVE AND EXTENSION , 1995 .

[12]  Mats Forsgren,et al.  In Search of Centre of Excellence: Network Embeddedness and Subsidiary Roles in Multinational Corporations , 2000 .

[13]  B. Uzzi,et al.  Social Structure and Competition in Interfirm Networks: The Paradox of Embeddedness , 1997 .

[14]  J. Birkinshaw,et al.  Weight Versus Voice: How Foreign Subsidiaries Gain Attention From Corporate Headquarters , 2008 .

[15]  S. Ghoshal,et al.  Social Capital and Value Creation: The Role of Intrafirm Networks , 1998 .

[16]  Mats Forsgren,et al.  Subsidiary Embeddedness and Competence Development in MNCs A Multi-Level Analysis , 2001 .

[17]  Ulf R. Andersson,et al.  Subsidiary performance in multinational corporations: the importance of technology embeddedness , 2001 .

[18]  Ulf R. Andersson,et al.  The strategic impact of external networks: Subsidiary performance and competence development in the multinational corporation , 2002 .

[19]  Donald W. Marquaridt.  Generalized Inverses, Ridge Regression, Biased Linear Estimation, and Nonlinear Estimation , 1970 .

[20]  P. Ghauri.  New structures in MNCs based in small countries: A network approach , 1992 .

[21]  Wenpin Tsai.  Social Structure of Coopetition Within a Multiunit Organization: Coordination, Competition, and Intraorganizational Knowledge Sharing , 2002 .

[22]  Anil K. Gupta,et al.  Knowledge Flows and the Structure of Control Within Multinational Corporations , 1991 .

[23]  John Roberts,et al.  Repairing Managerial Knowledge-Ability Over Distance , 2003 .

[24]  Mike W. Peng,et al.  Managerial Ties and Firm Performance in a Transition Economy: The Nature of a Micro-Macro Link , 2000 .

[25]  Anil K. Gupta,et al.  Knowledge flows within multinational corporations , 2000 .

[26]  Louis T. Wells,et al.  Managing the multinational enterprise , 1972 .

[27]  Ulf R. Andersson,et al.  Subsidiary embeddedness and control in the multinational corporation , 1996 .

[28]  Paul W. Beamish,et al.  Multinational Firm Knowledge, Use of Expatriates, and Foreign Subsidiary Performance , 2010 .

[29]  T. Kostova,et al.  Social Capital in Multinational Corporations and a Micro-Macro Model of its Formation , 2003 .

[30]  Paul W. Beamish,et al.  MULTINATIONAL FIRM KNOWLEDGE, USE OF EXPATRIATES AND FOREIGN SUBSIDIARY PERFORMANCE. , 2008 .

[31]  R. Mudambi,et al.  Is Knowledge Power? Knowledge Flows, Subsidiary Power and Rent-Seeking within MNCs , 2004 .

[32]  Ulf R. Andersson,et al.  Balancing subsidiary influence in the federative MNC: a business network view , 2007 .

[33]  J. Daniels.  Organizing the Multinational Enterprise: An Information-Processing Perspective , 1988 .

[34]  Julian Birkinshaw,et al.  INTRA-FIRM COMPETITION AND CHARTER EVOLUTION IN THE MULTI-BUSINESS FIRM , 2008 .

[35]  J. Birkinshaw,et al.  Multinational Subsidiary Evolution: Capability and Charter Change in Foreign-Owned Subsidiary Companies , 1998 .

[36]  Peter J. Lane,et al.  Relative absorptive capacity and interorganizational learning , 1998 .

[37]  Damien McLoughlin,et al.  Markets-as-networks: notes on a unique understanding , 2002 .

[38]  Stefan Schmid,et al.  The development of critical capabilities in foreign subsidiaries: disentangling the role of the subsidiary's business network , 2003 .

[39]  Julian Birkinshaw,et al.  Intrafirm Competition and Charter Evolution in the Multibusiness Firm , 2005, Organ. Sci..

[40]  Wenpin Tsai.  Social capital, strategic relatedness and the formation of intraorganizational linkages , 2000 .

[41]  J. Birkinshaw,et al.  Fighting the corporate immune system: a process study of subsidiary initiatives in multinational corporations , 1999 .

[42]  R. Gulati.  Alliances and networks , 1998 .

[43]  C. Bartlett,et al.  Beyond the M-form: toward a managerial theory of the firm , 1993 .

[44]  M. Casson,et al.  Models of the Multinational Enterprise , 1998 .

[45]  Tony S. Frost.  The geographic sources of foreign subsidiaries' innovations , 2001 .

[46]  C. Prahalad,et al.  The dominant logic: A new linkage between diversity and performance , 1986 .

[47]  Eric von Hippel,et al.  Locating Adaptive Learning: The Situated Nature of Adaptive Learning in Organizations , 1997 .

[48]  John Cantwell,et al.  MNE competence‐creating subsidiary mandates , 2005 .

[49]  Mats Forsgren,et al.  Critical Perspectives on Internationalisation , 2002 .

[50]  Ram Mudambi,et al.  MNE internal capital markets and subsidiary strategic independence , 1999 .

[51]  J. I. Canales,et al.  Subsidiary Strategy: The Embeddedness Component , 2007 .

[52]  Devi R. Gnyawali,et al.  Knowledge ties among subsidiaries in MNCs: A multi-level conceptual model , 2009 .

[53]  M. Yamin.  Subsidiary Business Networks and Opportunity Development in Multinational Enterprises: A Comparison of the Influence of Internal and External Business Networks , 2005 .

[54]  H. Håkansson,et al.  Subsidiary Entrepreneurship and the Advantage of Multinationality , 2002 .

[55]  R. Pearce.  The evolution of technology in multinational enterprises: the role of creative subsidiaries , 1999 .

[56]  Charles Dhanaraj,et al.  Managing the Embedded Multinational: A Business Network View , 2006 .

[57]  P. Regnér.  Strategy Creation in the Periphery: Inductive Versus Deductive Strategy Making , 2003 .

[58]  J. Hair.  Multivariate data analysis , 1972 .

[59]  Torben Pedersen,et al.  The Emergence and Impact of MNC Centres of Excellence: A Subsidiary Perspective , 2000 .