Optimization of intensity-modulated 3D conformal treatment plans based on biological indices.

To overcome the limitations of the intensity modulation optimization techniques based on dose criteria, we introduce a method for optimizing intensity distributions in which we employ an objective function based on biological indices. The objective function also includes constraints on dose and dose-volume combinations to ensure that the results are consistent with the physician's judgement. We apply a variant of the steepest-descent method to optimize the objective function. The method is three-dimensional and incorporates scattered radiation in the optimization process using an iterative scheme employing the pencil beam convolution method. Previously we had shown that the inverse technique of obtaining optimum intensity distributions, for which the objectives are defined in terms of a desired uniform dose to the target volume and desired upper limits of dose to normal organs, produces satisfactory approximations of the desired dose distributions for prostate plans. However, for lung, the performance of this technique was considerably inferior. Our conclusion was that, in general, it is not sufficient to specify the objectives of optimization purely in terms of a desired pattern of dose and that the objectives should also incorporate biology, perhaps in the form of biological indices. We demonstrate that the biology-based approach produces lung plans that are superior to those produced when only dose-based objectives are used. For the treatment of prostate, the two methods produce comparable dose distributions.

[1]  A. Cormack,et al.  A problem in rotation therapy with X rays. , 1987, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[2]  A Brahme,et al.  Optimization of the dose delivery in a few field techniques using radiobiological objective functions. , 1993, Medical physics.

[3]  J M Galvin,et al.  Combining multileaf fields to modulate fluence distributions. , 1993, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[4]  A. Brahme,et al.  Optimization of stationary and moving beam radiation therapy techniques. , 1988, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[5]  Goitein The Comparison of Treatment Plans. , 1992, Seminars in radiation oncology.

[6]  D. Convery,et al.  The generation of intensity-modulated fields for conformal radiotherapy by dynamic collimation , 1992 .

[7]  A B Wolbarst,et al.  Optimization of radiation therapy, III: A method of assessing complication probabilities from dose-volume histograms. , 1987, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[8]  G J Kutcher,et al.  The potential and limitations of the inverse radiotherapy technique. , 1994, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[9]  Wolfgang Schlegel,et al.  Three-Dimensional Solution of the Inverse Problem in Conformation Radiotherapy , 1992 .

[10]  A Brahme,et al.  An algorithm for maximizing the probability of complication-free tumour control in radiation therapy , 1992, Physics in medicine and biology.

[11]  R Mohan,et al.  Clinically relevant optimization of 3-D conformal treatments. , 1992, Medical physics.

[12]  R. Cormack,et al.  A problem in rotation therapy with X-rays: dose distributions with an axis of symmetry. , 1987, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[13]  T. Bortfeld,et al.  Methods of image reconstruction from projections applied to conformation radiotherapy. , 1990, Physics in medicine and biology.

[14]  A. Brahme,et al.  Optimization of radiation therapy , 1994 .

[15]  N. Barth,et al.  An inverse problem in radiation therapy. , 1990, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[16]  A Brahme,et al.  The clinical value of different treatment objectives and degrees of freedom in radiation therapy optimization. , 1993, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[17]  R Svensson,et al.  An analytical solution for the dynamic control of multileaf collimators. , 1994, Physics in medicine and biology.

[18]  A Brahme,et al.  Solution of an integral equation encountered in rotation therapy. , 1982, Physics in medicine and biology.

[19]  H M Kooy,et al.  The verification of an inverse problem in radiation therapy. , 1990, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[20]  T. Bortfeld,et al.  X-ray field compensation with multileaf collimators. , 1994, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[21]  Anders Brahme,et al.  Two accurate algorithms for calculating the energy fluence profile in inverse radiation therapy planning , 1993 .

[22]  S. Webb Optimization by simulated annealing of three-dimensional, conformal treatment planning for radiation fields defined by a multileaf collimator: II. Inclusion of two-dimensional modulation of the x-ray intensity. , 1992, Physics in medicine and biology.

[23]  S. Spirou,et al.  Generation of arbitrary intensity profiles by dynamic jaws or multileaf collimators. , 1994, Medical physics.

[24]  R Mackie,et al.  Letter in response to "Optimization of radiation therapy and the development of multileaf collimation" by Anders Brahme. , 1994, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[25]  B K Lind,et al.  Experimental verification of an algorithm for inverse radiation therapy planning. , 1990, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[26]  R Mohan,et al.  Compensators for three-dimensional treatment planning. , 1991, Medical physics.