ANALYTICAL AND NUMERICAL MODELING METHODS FOR IMPEDANCE ANALYSIS OF SINGLE CELLS ON-CHIP

Electrical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) is a noninvasive method for characterizing the dielectric properties of biological particles. The technique can differentiate between cell types and provide information on cell properties through measurement of the permittivity and conductivity of the cell membrane and cytoplasm. In terms of lab-on-a-chip (LOC) technology, cells pass sequentially through the microfluidic channel at high speed and are analyzed individually, rather than as traditionally done on a mixture of particles in suspension. This paper describes the analytical and numerical modeling methods for EIS of single cell analysis in a microfluidic cytometer. The presented modeling methods include Maxwell’s mixture theory, equivalent circuit model and finite element method. The difference and advantages of these methods have been discussed. The modeling work has covered the static case — an immobilized cell in suspension and the dynamic case — a moving cell in the channel.

[1]  H. Schwan Electrical properties of tissue and cell suspensions. , 1957, Advances in biological and medical physics.

[2]  Hywel Morgan,et al.  High speed simultaneous single particle impedance and fluorescence analysis on a chip , 2006 .

[3]  Hywel Morgan,et al.  Design and fabrication of travelling wave dielectrophoresis structures , 2000 .

[4]  Hywel Morgan,et al.  Broadband single cell impedance spectroscopy using maximum length sequences: theoretical analysis and practical considerations , 2007 .

[5]  A. Irimajiri,et al.  A method for determining the dielectric constant and the conductivity of membrane-bounded particles of biological relevance , 1975, Biophysics of structure and mechanism.

[6]  E. Cummings,et al.  Dielectrophoretic concentration and separation of live and dead bacteria in an array of insulators. , 2004, Analytical chemistry.

[7]  G. R. Facer,et al.  Capacitance cytometry: measuring biological cells one by one. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[8]  H Morgan,et al.  Analytical electric field and sensitivity analysis for two microfluidic impedance cytometer designs. , 2007, IET nanobiotechnology.

[9]  S. Gawad,et al.  Micromachined impedance spectroscopy flow cytometer for cell analysis and particle sizing. , 2001, Lab on a chip.

[10]  H. Morgan,et al.  Ac electrokinetics: a survey of sub-micrometre particle dynamics , 2000 .

[11]  Wilson C. K. Poon,et al.  Phase behavior and crystallization kinetics of PHSA-coated PMMA colloids , 2003 .

[12]  F F Becker,et al.  Dielectric properties of human leukocyte subpopulations determined by electrorotation as a cell separation criterion. , 1999, Biophysical journal.

[13]  Hywel Morgan,et al.  Dielectric spectroscopy of single cells: time domain analysis using Maxwell's mixture equation , 2007 .

[14]  Hywel Morgan,et al.  Bead-based immunoassays using a micro-chip flow cytometer. , 2007, Lab on a chip.

[15]  H. Pauly,et al.  Über die Impedanz einer Suspension von kugelförmigen Teilchen mit einer Schale , 1959 .

[16]  H Morgan,et al.  Discrimination and analysis of phytoplankton using a microfluidic cytometer. , 2007, IET nanobiotechnology.

[17]  H. Fricke,et al.  A Mathematical Treatment of the Electric Conductivity and Capacity of Disperse Systems I. The Electric Conductivity of a Suspension of Homogeneous Spheroids , 1924 .

[18]  Hywel Morgan,et al.  High speed multi-frequency impedance analysis of single particles in a microfluidic cytometer using maximum length sequences. , 2007, Lab on a chip.

[19]  J. Voldman Electrical forces for microscale cell manipulation. , 2006, Annual review of biomedical engineering.

[20]  Hywel Morgan,et al.  Large-area travelling-wave dielectrophoresis particle separator , 1997 .

[21]  D. A. G. Bruggeman Berechnung Verschiederner Physikalischer Konstante von Heterogenen Substanzan , 1935 .

[22]  J. Maxwell A Treatise on Electricity and Magnetism , 1873, Nature.

[23]  C. Dalton,et al.  Analysis of parasites by electrorotation , 2004, Journal of applied microbiology.

[24]  S. Gawad,et al.  Single cell dielectric spectroscopy , 2007 .

[25]  Hywel Morgan,et al.  AC ELECTROKINETICS: COLLOIDS AND NANOPARTICLES. , 2002 .

[26]  Y. Huang,et al.  Electrokinetic behaviour of colloidal particles in travelling electric fields: studies using yeast cells , 1993 .

[27]  Urban Seger,et al.  Dielectric spectroscopy in a micromachined flow cytometer: theoretical and practical considerations. , 2004, Lab on a chip.

[28]  Andrew G. Glen,et al.  APPL , 2001 .

[29]  R. Hölzel,et al.  Electrorotation of single yeast cells at frequencies between 100 Hz and 1.6 GHz. , 1997, Biophysical journal.

[30]  H. Fricke,et al.  A Mathematical Treatment of the Electric Conductivity and Capacity of Disperse Systems ii. The Capacity of a Suspension of Conducting Spheroids Surrounded by a Non-Conducting Membrane for a Current of Low Frequency , 1925 .

[31]  H. Fricke THE ELECTRIC CONDUCTIVITY OF DISPERSE SYSTEMS , 1924, The Journal of general physiology.

[32]  Richard D. Rabbitt,et al.  Electric impedance spectroscopy using microchannels with integrated metal electrodes , 1999 .

[33]  H Morgan,et al.  Separation of submicron bioparticles by dielectrophoresis. , 1999, Biophysical journal.