Non-Euclidean classification of medically imaged objects via s-reps

Classifying medically imaged objects, e.g., into diseased and normal classes, has been one of the important goals in medical imaging. We propose a novel classification scheme that uses a skeletal representation to provide rich non-Euclidean geometric object properties. Our statistical method combines distance weighted discrimination (DWD) with a carefully chosen Euclideanization which takes full advantage of the geometry of the manifold on which these non-Euclidean geometric object properties (GOPs) live. Our method is evaluated via the task of classifying 3D hippocampi between schizophrenics and healthy controls. We address three central questions. 1) Does adding shape features increase discriminative power over the more standard classification based only on global volume? 2) If so, does our skeletal representation provide greater discriminative power than a conventional boundary point distribution model (PDM)? 3) Especially, is Euclideanization of non-Euclidean shape properties important in achieving high discriminative power? Measuring the capability of a method in terms of area under the receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curve, we show that our proposed method achieves strongly better classification than both the classification method based on global volume alone and the s-rep-based classification method without proper Euclideanization of non-Euclidean GOPs. We show classification using Euclideanized s-reps is also superior to classification using PDMs, whether the PDMs are first Euclideanized or not. We also show improved performance with Euclideanized boundary PDMs over non-linear boundary PDMs. This demonstrates the benefit that proper Euclideanization of non-Euclidean GOPs brings not only to s-rep-based classification but also to PDM-based classification.

[1]  L. Younes,et al.  On the metrics and euler-lagrange equations of computational anatomy. , 2002, Annual review of biomedical engineering.

[2]  Corinna Cortes,et al.  Support-Vector Networks , 1995, Machine Learning.

[3]  M. C. Jones Kumaraswamy’s distribution: A beta-type distribution with some tractability advantages , 2009 .

[4]  Timothy F. Cootes,et al.  Active Shape Models-Their Training and Application , 1995, Comput. Vis. Image Underst..

[5]  Anuj Srivastava,et al.  Statistical Shape Analysis , 2014, Computer Vision, A Reference Guide.

[6]  J. S. Marron,et al.  Non-linear Hypothesis Testing of Geometric Object Properties of Shapes Applied to Hippocampi , 2015, Journal of Mathematical Imaging and Vision.

[7]  Paul A. Yushkevich,et al.  Deformable Modeling Using a 3D Boundary Representation with Quadratic Constraints on the Branching Structure of the Blum Skeleton , 2013, IPMI.

[8]  Martin Styner,et al.  Entropy-based correspondence improvement of interpolated skeletal models , 2016, Comput. Vis. Image Underst..

[9]  J. S. Marron,et al.  Nested Sphere Statistics of Skeletal Models , 2013, Innovations for Shape Analysis, Models and Algorithms.

[10]  J. S. Marron,et al.  Backwards Principal Component Analysis and Principal Nested Relations , 2014, Journal of Mathematical Imaging and Vision.

[11]  Michael I. Miller,et al.  Large Deformation Diffeomorphism and Momentum Based Hippocampal Shape Discrimination in Dementia of the Alzheimer type , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[12]  J. Marron,et al.  A Backward Generalization of PCA for Image Analysis , 2010 .

[13]  Rui Wang,et al.  Skeletal Shape Correspondence Through Entropy , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[14]  Guido Gerig,et al.  Morphometry of anatomical shape complexes with dense deformations and sparse parameters , 2014, NeuroImage.

[15]  Stephan Huckemann,et al.  Dimension Reduction on Polyspheres with Application to Skeletal Representations , 2015, GSI.

[16]  Martin Bauer,et al.  Almost Local Metrics on Shape Space of Hypersurfaces in n-Space , 2010, SIAM J. Imaging Sci..

[17]  Marius George Linguraru,et al.  Digital facial dysmorphology for genetic screening: Hierarchical constrained local model using ICA , 2014, Medical Image Anal..

[18]  Aaron F. Bobick,et al.  Multiscale 3-D Shape Representation and Segmentation Using Spherical Wavelets , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[19]  Martin Styner,et al.  Skeletal shape correspondence via entropy minimization , 2015, Medical Imaging.

[20]  J. Marron,et al.  Analysis of principal nested spheres. , 2012, Biometrika.

[21]  Gregg Tracton,et al.  Training models of anatomic shape variability. , 2008, Medical physics.

[22]  Anuj Srivastava,et al.  Elastic Geodesic Paths in Shape Space of Parameterized Surfaces , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[23]  Peter T Fox,et al.  Asymmetry of the brain surface from deformation field analysis , 2003, Human brain mapping.

[24]  Martin Bauer,et al.  Sobolev metrics on shape space of surfaces , 2010, 1211.3515.

[25]  Alain Trouvé,et al.  Computing Large Deformation Metric Mappings via Geodesic Flows of Diffeomorphisms , 2005, International Journal of Computer Vision.

[26]  Stefan Sommer,et al.  Anisotropic Distributions on Manifolds: Template Estimation and Most Probable Paths , 2015, IPMI.

[27]  Martin Bauer,et al.  Sobolev metrics on shape space of surfaces in n-space , 2010 .

[28]  Douglas W. Jones,et al.  Shape analysis of brain ventricles using SPHARM , 2001, Proceedings IEEE Workshop on Mathematical Methods in Biomedical Image Analysis (MMBIA 2001).

[29]  Timothy F. Cootes,et al.  Training Models of Shape from Sets of Examples , 1992, BMVC.

[30]  D. Louis Collins,et al.  Hippocampal shape analysis using medial surfaces , 2001, NeuroImage.

[31]  Jan J. Koenderink,et al.  Solid shape , 1990 .

[32]  Martin Styner,et al.  Boundary and Medial Shape Analysis of the Hippocampus in Schizophrenia , 2003, MICCAI.

[33]  Martin Styner,et al.  Multi-Object Analysis of Volume, Pose, and Shape Using Statistical Discrimination , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[34]  Martin Styner,et al.  Localized differences in caudate and hippocampal shape are associated with schizophrenia but not antipsychotic type , 2013, Psychiatry Research: Neuroimaging.

[35]  James Stephen Marron,et al.  Generalized PCA via the Backward Stepwise Approach in Image Analysis , 2010 .

[36]  James Stephen Marron,et al.  Distance‐weighted discrimination , 2015 .

[37]  Кпсс,et al.  Первая конференция военных и боевых организаций РСДРП. Ноябрь 1906 год , 1932 .

[38]  Timothy F. Cootes,et al.  Shape Discrimination in the Hippocampus Using an MDL Model , 2003, IPMI.

[39]  Anuj Srivastava,et al.  Parameterization-Invariant Shape Statistics and Probabilistic Classification of Anatomical Surfaces , 2011, IPMI.

[40]  Martin Styner,et al.  Subcortical structure segmentation using probabilistic atlas priors , 2007, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[41]  Colin Rose Computational Statistics , 2011, International Encyclopedia of Statistical Science.

[42]  Anuj Srivastava,et al.  Elastic Shape Matching of Parameterized Surfaces Using Square Root Normal Fields , 2012, ECCV.

[43]  Miriah D. Meyer,et al.  Entropy-Based Particle Systems for Shape Correspondence , 2006 .

[44]  Martin Styner,et al.  Framework for the Statistical Shape Analysis of Brain Structures using SPHARM-PDM. , 2006, The insight journal.

[45]  D. Kendall SHAPE MANIFOLDS, PROCRUSTEAN METRICS, AND COMPLEX PROJECTIVE SPACES , 1984 .