Cloud and traditional videoconferencing technology for telemedicine and distance learning.

INTRODUCTION Cloud-based videoconferencing versus traditional systems are described for possible use in telemedicine and distance learning. MATERIALS AND METHODS Differences between traditional and cloud-based videoconferencing systems are examined, and the methods for identifying and testing systems are explained. Findings are presented characterizing the cloud conferencing genre and its attributes versus traditional H.323 conferencing. RESULTS Because the technology is rapidly evolving and needs to be evaluated in reference to local needs, it is strongly recommended that this or other reviews not be considered substitutes for personal hands-on experience. CONCLUSIONS This review identifies key attributes of the technology that can be used to appraise the relevance of cloud conferencing technology and to determine whether migration from traditional technology to a cloud environment is warranted. An evaluation template is provided for assessing systems appropriateness.

[1]  Ajay Luthra,et al.  Overview of the H.264/AVC video coding standard , 2003, IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst. Video Technol..

[2]  Peter Steenkiste,et al.  A conference gateway supporting interoperability between SIP and H.323 , 2001, MULTIMEDIA '01.

[3]  Philip K. Chan,et al.  Learning rules for anomaly detection of hostile network traffic , 2003, Third IEEE International Conference on Data Mining.

[4]  Dagny Evans.  An introduction to unified communications: challenges and opportunities , 2004, Aslib Proc..

[5]  Craig Locatis,et al.  Internet-based videoconferencing coder/decoders and tools for telemedicine. , 2011, Telemedicine journal and e-health : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association.

[6]  Joaquín Salvachúa,et al.  VaaS: Videoconference as a service , 2009, 2009 5th International Conference on Collaborative Computing: Networking, Applications and Worksharing.