Gamification for Astronaut Training

This paper reports on the use and the evaluation of applying gaming aspects as a means to promote self-study and increase motivation to train for executing operations on human space flight missions that have a duration that exceeds the typical duration of low earth orbit missions. The gaming aspects that are evaluated include avatar representation, leaderboards, short ‘quest’ lessons, immediate rewarding, the notion of achievements, the structuring of training content using a skill-graph, and character development. These aspects are implemented in a prototype that integrates training execution, monitoring and evaluation. Subsequently, the prototype is used to evaluate the applicability and efficiency of gaming concepts for training. The evaluation is based on a structured walkthrough, where participants are guided and questioned while using the prototype in a predetermined way. In general, the results indicate that the use of gaming aspects have a positive impact on self-study and motivation. In particular the structuring of training content and the character development that is linked to it invites to train more. However, rich training material should be coupled tightly into the gaming aspects in order to achieve these results. This study provides an initial step into applying gaming aspects for astronaut training. More research should be done to further study the applicability of this approach.

[1]  J. McGonigal.  Reality Is Broken: Why Games Make Us Better and How They Can Change the World , 2011 .

[2]  Richard E. Clark,et al.  Why Minimal Guidance During Instruction Does Not Work: An Analysis of the Failure of Constructivist, Discovery, Problem-Based, Experiential, and Inquiry-Based Teaching , 2006 .

[3]  T. Grant,et al.  The mission execution crew assistant : Improving human-machine team resilience for long duration missions , 2008 .

[4]  Yao-Hua Tan,et al.  Information Technology (IT) , 2011, Accelerating Global Supply Chains with IT-Innovation.

[5]  Lloyd P. Rieber,et al.  Seriously considering play: Designing interactive learning environments based on the blending of microworlds, simulations, and games , 1996 .

[6]  Willem-Paul Brinkman,et al.  Improving crew support methods in human-machine teams for long-durations missions , 2012 .

[7]  Michele D. Dickey.  Engaging by design: How engagement strategies in popular computer and video games can inform instructional design , 2005 .

[8]  Mark A. Neerincx,et al.  Engineering planetary exploration systems : Integrating novel technologies and the human element using work domain analysis , 2008 .

[9]  John-Jules Ch. Meyer,et al.  Situated cognitive engineering : the requirements and design of directed scenario-based training , 2011, AIED 2011.

[10]  Tom Murray,et al.  Toward Measuring and Maintaining the Zone of Proximal Development in Adaptive Instructional Systems , 2002, Intelligent Tutoring Systems.

[11]  John-Jules Ch. Meyer,et al.  Scenario-Based Training: Director's Cut , 2011, AIED.

[12]  Mark A. Neerincx.  Situated cognitive engineering for crew support in space , 2010, Personal and Ubiquitous Computing.

[13]  Thomas W. Malone,et al.  Toward a Theory of Intrinsically Motivating Instruction , 1981, Cogn. Sci..