Demand and innovation in productivity growth

The labour productivity impact of demand and innovation is investigated in this paper combining insights from the Kaldorian and Schumpeterian traditions. After a review of studies in such traditions, a general model is proposed for explaining productivity growth in European manufacturing and service industries in the late 1990s, followed by two distinct specifications for the industries oriented toward product innovation, and for those where process innovation dominates. The empirical analysis is based on the match of the SIEPI‐CIS2 database developed at the University of Urbino and Eurostat Input–Output Tables at the industry level, for 22 manufacturing sectors and 10 services sectors. Six European countries are considered: Germany, France, Italy, the Netherlands, Portugal and the United Kingdom. The results show that productivity growth in European industries can be explained by a combination of technology factors and demand dynamics, confirming the complementarity of technology and demand effects. On the demand side, household consumption emerges as the most pervasive component of demand, able to stimulate greater efficiency in all manufacturing and service industries. Investment also has a role, focused however on the capital goods producing industries. On the technology side, the mechanisms of productivity growth are fundamentally different in the industries oriented towards product innovation and in those dominated by process innovation. This evidence supports the view that innovation in firms and industries can be associated to two contrasting strategies, searching either for technological competitiveness, through knowledge generation, product innovation and expansion of new markets, or aiming at greater cost competitiveness, through job reductions, labour saving investment, flexibility and restructuring.

[1]  Zvi Griliches,et al.  R&D and Productivity: The Unfinished Business , 1998 .

[2]  Luigi Lodovico Pasinetti,et al.  Structural economic dynamics : a theory of the economic consequences of human learning , 1993 .

[3]  Jianmin Tang,et al.  Link between innovation and productivity in Canadian manufacturing industries , 2004 .

[4]  M. León-Ledesma.  Verdoorn's Law and increasing returns: an empirical analysis of the Spanish regions , 1999 .

[5]  Robert Dixon,et al.  A Model of Regional Growth-Rate Differences on Kaldorian Lines , 1975 .

[6]  F. Malerba.  Sectoral systems of innovation and production , 2002 .

[7]  J. Schumpeter.  The Theory of Economic Development: An Inquiry into Profits, Capital, Credit, Interest, and the Business Cycle , 1934 .

[8]  Jean Gadrey,et al.  Productivity, Innovation and Knowledge in Services , 2002 .

[9]  Katharina Wakelin,et al.  Productivity growth and R&D expenditure in UK manufacturing firms , 2001 .

[10]  Erkin I. Bairam.  THE VERDOORN LAW, RETURNS TO SCALE AND INDUSTRIAL GROWTH: A REVIEW OF THE LITERATURE , 1987 .

[11]  A. Parikh.  Differences in Growth Rates and Kaldor's Laws , 1978 .

[12]  Luc Soete,et al.  Technology and the Future of European Employment , 2001 .

[13]  M. Pugno,et al.  Productivity Growth and Economic Performance , 2002 .

[14]  Bernhard Felderer,et al.  Why Growth Rates Differ , 1967 .

[15]  Jacques Mairesse,et al.  Exploring the Relationship between R&D and Productivity in French Manufacturing Firms , 1992 .

[16]  William D. Nordhaus,et al.  Productivity Growth and the New Economy , 2002 .

[17]  Jan Fagerberg,et al.  Technological progress, structural change and productivity growth: a comparative study , 2000 .

[18]  J. Mairesse,et al.  Recherche-développement et performances des entreprises: une étude économétrique sur données individuelles , 1985 .

[19]  R. Solow.  TECHNICAL CHANGE AND THE AGGREGATE PRODUCTION FUNCTION , 1957 .

[20]  Erkin I. Bairam.  Economic growth and Kaldor's law: the case of Turkey, 1925–78 , 1991 .

[21]  S. Fabricant,et al.  Employment in Manufacturing, 1899-1939. , 1943 .

[22]  M. Pianta.  The employment impact of product and process innovations , 2000 .

[23]  Carluccio Bianchi.  A Reappraisal of Verdoorn’s Law for the Italian Economy, 1951–1997 , 2002 .

[24]  P. Petit.  Employment and technical change , 1993 .

[25]  Marco Vivarelli,et al.  The economics of technology and employment : theory and empirical evidence , 1995 .

[26]  S. Seiter.  Productivity and Employment in the Information Economy: What Kaldor’s and Verdoorn’s Growth Laws Can Teach the US , 2005 .

[27]  Hiroyuki Odagiri,et al.  The impact of R&D on productivity increase in Japanese manufacturing companies , 1986 .

[28]  J. Triplett.  The mismeasurement hypothesis and the productivity slowdown: the evidence , 2002 .

[29]  M. Pugno,et al.  Productivity growth and economic performance : essays on Verdoorn's law , 2002 .

[30]  D. Jorgenson.  Economic growth in the information age , 2002 .

[31]  C. Freeman,et al.  As Time Goes By: From the Industrial Revolutions to the Information Revolution , 2001 .

[32]  B. Soro.  ‘Fattori che regolano lo sviluppo della produttività del lavoro’ Fifty Years On , 2002 .

[33]  Dominique Guellec,et al.  Technological Innovation and Employment Reallocation , 2000 .

[34]  Kenneth I. Carlaw,et al.  The sources of total factor productivity growth: Evidence from Canadian data , 2004 .

[35]  J. Mccombie,et al.  Increasing Returns, Productivity, and Output Growth: The Case of the United States , 1983 .

[36]  F. Castellacci,et al.  Innovation, Diffusion and Cumulative Causation: Changes in the Spanish Growth Regime, 1960–2001 , 2006 .

[37]  Mario Pianta,et al.  The employment impact of innovation: Evidence and policy , 2000 .

[38]  Jacques Mairesse,et al.  Accounting for Innovation and Measuring Innovativeness: An Illustrative Framework and an Application , 2002 .

[39]  M. León-Ledesma.  Economic Growth and Verdoorn's Law in the Spanish Regions, 1962-91 , 2000 .

[40]  J. Mccombie.  What Still Remains of Kaldor's Laws? , 1981 .

[41]  Mario Pianta,et al.  Innovation and Employment , 2006 .

[42]  C. Antonelli.  The Economics of Innovation, New Technologies and Structural Change , 2002 .

[43]  Z. Griliches,et al.  The Explanation of Productivity Change , 1967 .

[44]  F. Crespi,et al.  Diversity in innovation and productivity in Europe , 2008 .

[45]  Dubravko Radic,et al.  Employment and Technological Change , 2002 .

[46]  Jacques Mairesse,et al.  R&D Productivity: A Survey of Econometric Studies at the Firm Level , 1991 .

[47]  M. Pianta.  Innovation, demand and employment , 2001 .

[48]  Jonathan Eaton,et al.  Trade in Ideas: Patenting and Productivity in the OECD , 1995 .

[49]  Giorgio Sirilli,et al.  Measuring innovation in services , 1995 .

[50]  Jacques Mairesse,et al.  Research Investment, Innovation and Productivity: An Econometric Analysis at the Firm Level , 1998 .

[51]  J. Mairesse,et al.  Productivity, Inequality, and the Digital Economy: A Transatlantic Perspective , 2002 .

[52]  Mario Pianta,et al.  Employment Effects of Product and Process Innovation in Europe , 2002 .

[53]  R. Rowthorn.  A Note on Verdoorn's Law , 1979 .

[54]  J. Cornwall,et al.  A Demand and Supply Analysis of Productivity Growth , 2002 .

[55]  Zvi Griliches,et al.  Issues in Assessing the Contribution of Research and Development to Productivity Growth , 1979 .

[56]  A. Simonazzi.  Innovation and growth: supply and demand factors in the recent US expansion , 2003 .

[57]  J. Fagerberg,et al.  'Modern Capitalism' in the 1970s and 1980s , 1999 .

[58]  S. Destefanis.  The Verdoorn Law: Some Evidence from Non-parametric Frontier Analysis , 2002 .

[59]  M. Pugno.  On Competing Theories of Economic Growth: a Cross-country Evidence , 1995 .

[60]  E. Brynjolfsson,et al.  Beyond Computation: Information Technology, Organizational Transformation and Business Performance , 2000 .

[61]  Innovativity: A comparison across seven European countries , 2006 .

[62]  Warwick Lightfoot,et al.  The sources of economic growth in OECD countries , 2004 .

[63]  Paolo Pini.  Economic growth, technological change and employment: empirical evidence for a cumulative growth model with external causation for nine OECD countries: 1960–1990 , 1995 .

[64]  N. Kaldor.  Causes of the slow rate of economic growth of the United Kingdom , 1966 .

[65]  J. Mccombie,et al.  "The Verdoorn Law Controversy": Some New Empirical Evidence Using U.S. State Data , 1984 .

[66]  J. Fagerberg,et al.  The Oxford handbook of innovation , 2006 .

[67]  D. Jorgenson,et al.  Raising the Speed Limit: U.S. Economic Growth in the Information Age , 2000 .

[68]  E. Brynjolfsson,et al.  Computing Productivity: Firm-Level Evidence , 2003 .

[69]  F. Crespi,et al.  Demand and Innovation in European Industries , 2007 .

[70]  F. Malerba,et al.  Technological Regimes and Schumpeterian Patterns of Innovation , 2000 .

[71]  Jora R. Minasian,et al.  Research and Development, Production Functions, and Rates of Return , 1969 .

[72]  Marcel P. Timmer,et al.  Does information and communication technology drive EU-US productivity growth differentials? , 2005 .

[73]  P. Schreyer.  The Contribution of Information and Communication Technology to Output Growth: A Study of the G7 Countries , 2000 .

[74]  Allyn A. Young,et al.  INCREASING RETURNS AND ECONOMIC PROGRESS , 1928 .

[75]  R. Rowthorn.  What Remains of Kaldor's Law? , 1975 .

[76]  K. Arrow.  The Economic Implications of Learning by Doing , 1962 .