Research on classification of LiDAR images derived from waveform decomposition over a suburban area

Abstract Light detection and ranging (LiDAR), as an active remote sensing technology, is characterized by providing high-precision geographical location information. In this study, we further explored its capability in image classification over a suburban area. Firstly, full waveforms of small footprint airborne LiDAR were decomposed into discrete point clouds. During the decomposition, six parameters describing the physical interaction between laser pulse and the targets were calculated. They are amplitude, pulse width, central position, range, backscatter cross-section and backscatter coefficient. Secondly, the point clouds were interpolated into raster. Correspondingly, six high spatial resolution images (0.5 m) were produced. Three classification models namely decision tree (DT), maximum likelihood (ML) and support vector machine (SVM) were established based on these images. The objects of interest were classified into buildings, trees, bare soil and crop land. Results showed that all these three models yielded high overall accuracy and kappa coefficient. SVM performed the best with the highest overall accuracy (87.85%) and kappa coefficient (83.29%). Therefore, we came to conclude that classification models can also achieve satisfactory classification accuracy on LiDAR images as they did on common remote-sensed images. In addition, our study proved that physical information derived from waveform LiDAR showed good potential in classification.

[1]  Lorenzo Bruzzone,et al.  Classification of hyperspectral remote sensing images with support vector machines , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[2]  Chih-Jen Lin,et al.  A Practical Guide to Support Vector Classication , 2008 .

[3]  Bin Li,et al.  Stepwise decomposition and relative radiometric normalization for small footprint LiDAR waveform , 2011 .

[4]  Yifang Ban,et al.  Toward an Optimal Algorithm for LiDAR Waveform Decomposition , 2012, IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters.

[5]  W. Wagner,et al.  Gaussian decomposition and calibration of a novel small-footprint full-waveform digitising airborne laser scanner , 2006 .

[6]  W. Wagner,et al.  3D vegetation mapping using small‐footprint full‐waveform airborne laser scanners , 2008 .

[7]  S. Popescu Estimating biomass of individual pine trees using airborne lidar , 2007 .

[8]  Michael G. Wing,et al.  Airborne Light Detection and Ranging (LiDAR) for Individual Tree Stem Location, Height, and Biomass Measurements , 2011, Remote. Sens..

[9]  Z. Niu,et al.  Watershed Allied Telemetry Experimental Research , 2009 .

[10]  John A. Richards,et al.  Remote Sensing Digital Image Analysis , 1986 .

[11]  Linhai Jing,et al.  Improving the efficiency and accuracy of individual tree crown delineation from high-density LiDAR data , 2014, Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinformation.

[12]  Wolfgang Wagner,et al.  Radiometric calibration of small-footprint full-waveform airborne laser scanner measurements: Basic physical concepts , 2010 .

[13]  Chih-Jen Lin,et al.  Probability Estimates for Multi-class Classification by Pairwise Coupling , 2003, J. Mach. Learn. Res..

[14]  Emilio Chuvieco,et al.  Estimation of leaf area index and covered ground from airborne laser scanner (Lidar) in two contrasting forests , 2004 .