Early Child Grammars: Qualitative and Quantitative Analysis of Morphosyntactic Production

This article reports on a series of 5 analyses of spontaneous production of verbal inflection (tense and person-number agreement) by 2-year-olds acquiring French as a native language. A formal analysis of the qualitative and quantitative results is developed using the unique resources of Optimality Theory (OT; Prince & Smolensky, 2004). It is argued that acquisition of morphosyntax proceeds via overlapping grammars (rather than through abrupt changes), which OT formalizes in terms of partial rather than total constraint rankings. Initially, economy of structure constraints take priority over faithfulness constraints that demand faithful expression of a speaker's intent, resulting in child production of tense that is comparable in level to that of child-directed speech. Using the independent Predominant Length of Utterance measure of syntactic development proposed in Vainikka, Legendre, and Todorova (1999), production of agreement is shown first to lag behind tense then to compete with tense at an intermediate stage of development. As the child's development progresses, faithfulness constraints become more dominant, and the overall production of tense and agreement becomes adult-like.

[1]  Jürgen M. Meisel,et al.  Bilingual first language acquisition : French and German grammatical development , 1994 .

[2]  J. Stemberger,et al.  The Emergence of Faithfulness , 1999 .

[3]  J. Grimshaw.  Projection, heads, and optimality , 1997 .

[4]  A. E. Pierce,et al.  Language Acquisition and Syntactic Theory: A Comparative Analysis of French and English Child Grammars , 1992 .

[5]  Jürgen M. Meisel.  Two first languages : early grammatical development in bilingual children , 1990 .

[6]  T. Klee,et al.  The relation between grammatical development and mean length of utterance in morphemes , 1985, Journal of Child Language.

[7]  Bill Reynolds,et al.  Optimality Theory and variable word-final deletion in Faetar , 1997, Language Variation and Change.

[8]  Eve V. Clark,et al.  Comprehension, Production, and Language Acquisition , 1983 .

[9]  Dorothy V. M. Bishop,et al.  Uncommon Understanding: Development and Disorders of Language Comprehension in Children , 1997 .

[10]  Boersma,et al.  [Review of: A. Anttila (1997) Variation in Finnish phonology and morphology] , 2001 .

[11]  A. Gnanadesikan.  Constraints in Phonological Acquisition: Markedness and faithfulness constraints in child phonology , 2004 .

[12]  Paul Hagstrom,et al.  Deriving output probabilities in child Mandarin from a Dual-Optimization grammar $ , 2004 .

[13]  Katherine Demuth,et al.  Markedness and the Development of Prosodic Structure , 1995 .

[14]  M. Tomasello.  First Verbs: A Case Study of Early Grammatical Development , 1994 .

[15]  M. Tomasello.  Do young children have adult syntactic competence? , 2000, Cognition.

[16]  Andrew Radford,et al.  Syntactic Theory and the Acquisition of English Syntax: The Nature of Early Child Grammars of English , 1990 .

[17]  Géraldine Legendre,et al.  Defaults and competition in the acquisition of functional categories in Catalan and French , 2003 .

[18]  Philip H. Miller,et al.  Clitics and constituents in phrase structure grammar , 1992 .

[19]  P. Smolensky,et al.  When is less more? Faithfulness and minimal links in wh-chains , 1998 .

[20]  Julie Auger,et al.  Pronominal Clitics in Québec Colloquial French: A Morphological Analysis , 1994 .

[21]  J. Pine,et al.  Lexically-based learning and early grammatical development , 1997, Journal of Child Language.

[22]  K. Wexler,et al.  Verb movement: Finiteness and head movement in early child grammars , 1994 .

[23]  P. Boersma,et al.  Empirical Tests of the Gradual Learning Algorithm , 2001, Linguistic Inquiry.

[24]  Yves Roberge,et al.  The syntactic recoverability of null arguments , 1990 .

[25]  G. Miller,et al.  Cognitive science. , 1981, Science.

[26]  C. Parisse,et al.  How children build their morphosyntax: the case of French , 2000, Journal of Child Language.

[27]  Elizabeth Bates,et al.  COMPREHENSION AND PRODUCTION IN EARLY LANGUAGE DEVELOPMENT , 1993 .

[28]  C Snow,et al.  Child language data exchange system , 1984, Journal of Child Language.

[29]  Pilar Barbosa,et al.  Is the best good enough? : optimality and competition in syntax , 1998 .

[30]  Letitia R. Naigles,et al.  Form is easy, meaning is hard: resolving a paradox in early child language , 2002, Cognition.

[31]  Walter Daelemans,et al.  Learnability in Optimality Theory , 2000, Linguistic Inquiry.

[32]  R. Brown,et al.  A First Language , 1973 .

[33]  Paul Hagstrom,et al.  Partial Constraint Ordering in Child French Syntax , 2002 .

[34]  D. Slobin.  The Crosslinguistic Study of Language Acquisition , 1987 .

[35]  Gunlög Josefsson,et al.  The Use and Function of Nonfinite Root Clauses in Swedish Child Language , 2002 .

[36]  E. Bates,et al.  Language comprehension in ape and child. , 1993, Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development.

[37]  F. Antinucci,et al.  How children talk about what happened , 1976, Journal of Child Language.

[38]  William Thomas Reynolds,et al.  Variation and phonological theory , 1994 .

[39]  P. Smolensky.  The Initial State and 'Richness of the Base' in Optimality Theory , 1996 .

[40]  Gail E. Kaiser,et al.  More about INFL-ection and Agreement: The Acquisition of Clitic Pronouns in French , 1994 .

[41]  P. Boersma.  How we learn variation, optionality and probalility , 1997 .

[42]  Harald Clahsen,et al.  Functional Categories in Early Child German , 1993 .

[43]  C. Levelt.  On the acquisition of place , 1994 .

[44]  P. Smolensky,et al.  Optimality Theory: Constraint Interaction in Generative Grammar , 2004 .

[45]  K. Wexler.  Very early parameter setting and the unique checking constraint: a new explanation of the optional infinitive stage: a new explanation of the optional infinitive stage , 1998 .

[46]  C. Foley,et al.  The development of functional categories : The acquisition of the subject in French , 1998 .

[47]  Jürgen M. Meisel.  Chapter 9. INFL–ection: Subjects and subject–verb agreement , 1990 .