Potentiation of tumor responses to DNA damaging therapy by the selective ATR inhibitor VX-970

Platinum-based DNA-damaging chemotherapy is standard-of-care for most patients with lung cancer but outcomes remain poor. This has been attributed, in part, to the highly effective repair network known as the DNA-damage response (DDR). ATR kinase is a critical regulator of this pathway, and its inhibition has been shown to sensitize some cancer, but not normal, cells in vitro to DNA damaging agents. However, there are limited in vivo proof-of-concept data for ATR inhibition. To address this we profiled VX-970, the first clinical ATR inhibitor, in a series of in vitro and in vivo lung cancer models and compared it with an inhibitor of the downstream kinase Chk1. VX-970 markedly sensitized a large proportion of a lung cancer cell line and primary tumor panel in vitro to multiple DNA damaging drugs with clear differences to Chk1 inhibition observed. In vivo VX-970 blocked ATR activity in tumors and dramatically enhanced the efficacy of cisplatin across a panel of patient derived primary lung xenografts. The combination led to complete tumor growth inhibition in three cisplatin-insensitive models and durable tumor regression in a cisplatin-sensitive model. These data provide a strong rationale for the clinical evaluation of VX-970 in lung cancer patients.

[1]  Y. Summers,et al.  Third-line chemotherapy in small-cell lung cancer: an international analysis. , 2014, Clinical lung cancer.

[2]  Ivana Yen,et al.  Combination Drug Scheduling Defines a “Window of Opportunity” for Chemopotentiation of Gemcitabine by an Orally Bioavailable, Selective ChK1 Inhibitor, GNE-900 , 2013, Molecular Cancer Therapeutics.

[3]  K. Flatten,et al.  ATR inhibition broadly sensitizes ovarian cancer cells to chemotherapy independent of BRCA status. , 2013, Cancer research.

[4]  A. Shields,et al.  PET Imaging of Proliferation with Pyrimidines , 2013, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[5]  Manikandan Paramasivam,et al.  ATR-dependent phosphorylation of FANCM at serine 1045 is essential for FANCM functions. , 2013, Cancer research.

[6]  M. Mehta,et al.  Molecular profiling in non-small cell lung cancer: a step toward personalized medicine. , 2013, Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine.

[7]  Tanja Cufer,et al.  Systemic therapy of advanced non-small cell lung cancer: major-developments of the last 5-years. , 2013, European Journal of Cancer.

[8]  Summer S. Han,et al.  Common genetic variants in the 9p21 region and their associations with multiple tumours , 2013, British Journal of Cancer.

[9]  H. Piwnica-Worms,et al.  Synthetic lethality of Chk1 inhibition combined with p53 and/or p21 loss during a DNA damage response in normal and tumor cells , 2012, Oncogene.

[10]  Steven J. M. Jones,et al.  Comprehensive molecular portraits of human breast tumours , 2013 .

[11]  B. Cornelissen,et al.  Targeting ATR in vivo using the novel inhibitor VE-822 results in selective sensitization of pancreatic tumors to radiation , 2012, Cell Death and Disease.

[12]  Steven J. M. Jones,et al.  Comprehensive genomic characterization of squamous cell lung cancers , 2012, Nature.

[13]  Steven J. M. Jones,et al.  Comprehensive molecular portraits of human breast tumors , 2012, Nature.

[14]  W. Mckenna,et al.  Targeting radiation-resistant hypoxic tumour cells through ATR inhibition , 2012, British Journal of Cancer.

[15]  Y. Maehara,et al.  ATR-ATRIP kinase complex triggers activation of the Fanconi anemia DNA repair pathway. , 2012, Cancer research.

[16]  A. Ashworth,et al.  The DNA damage response and cancer therapy , 2012, Nature.

[17]  O. Fernandez-Capetillo,et al.  Oncogenic stress sensitizes murine cancers to hypomorphic suppression of ATR. , 2012, The Journal of clinical investigation.

[18]  M. Barbacid,et al.  Exploiting oncogene-induced replicative stress for the selective killing of Myc-driven tumors , 2011, Nature Structural &Molecular Biology.

[19]  P. Maxwell,et al.  BRCA1 is both a prognostic and predictive biomarker of response to chemotherapy in sporadic epithelial ovarian cancer. , 2011, Gynecologic oncology.

[20]  Rochelle L. Garcia,et al.  Secondary somatic mutations restoring BRCA1/2 predict chemotherapy resistance in hereditary ovarian carcinomas. , 2011, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[21]  J. Sarkaria,et al.  Identification and evaluation of a potent novel ATR inhibitor, NU6027, in breast and ovarian cancer cell lines , 2011, British Journal of Cancer.

[22]  P. Reaper,et al.  Selective killing of ATM- or p53-deficient cancer cells through inhibition of ATR. , 2011, Nature chemical biology.

[23]  James R Bischoff,et al.  A cell-based screen identifies ATR inhibitors with synthetic lethal properties for cancer-associated mutations , 2011, Nature Structural &Molecular Biology.

[24]  F. Bunz,et al.  ATR mediates cisplatin resistance in a p53 genotype-specific manner , 2010, Oncogene.

[25]  B. Nabet,et al.  Combining ATR suppression with oncogenic Ras synergistically increases genomic instability, causing synthetic lethality or tumorigenesis in a dosage-dependent manner. , 2010, Cancer research.

[26]  Lye Mun Tho,et al.  The ATM-Chk2 and ATR-Chk1 pathways in DNA damage signaling and cancer. , 2010, Advances in cancer research.

[27]  J. Bartek,et al.  The DNA-damage response in human biology and disease , 2009, Nature.

[28]  M. Yaffe,et al.  The combined status of ATM and p53 link tumor development with therapeutic response. , 2009, Genes & development.

[29]  F. Mulero,et al.  A mouse model of ATR-Seckel shows embryonic replicative stress and accelerated aging , 2009, Nature Genetics.

[30]  L. Karnitz,et al.  Cisplatin-Induced DNA Damage Activates Replication Checkpoint Signaling Components that Differentially Affect Tumor Cell Survival , 2009, Molecular Pharmacology.

[31]  C. Bassing,et al.  ATR and H2AX Cooperate in Maintaining Genome Stability under Replication Stress* , 2009, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[32]  Brian H. Dunford-Shore,et al.  Somatic mutations affect key pathways in lung adenocarcinoma , 2008, Nature.

[33]  Stephen Green,et al.  AZD7762, a novel checkpoint kinase inhibitor, drives checkpoint abrogation and potentiates DNA-targeted therapies , 2008, Molecular Cancer Therapeutics.

[34]  K. Cimprich,et al.  ATR: an essential regulator of genome integrity , 2008, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[35]  Jiri Bartek,et al.  An Oncogene-Induced DNA Damage Model for Cancer Development , 2008, Science.

[36]  M. O’Connor,et al.  Targeted cancer therapies based on the inhibition of DNA strand break repair , 2007, Oncogene.

[37]  E. Birney,et al.  Patterns of somatic mutation in human cancer genomes , 2007, Nature.

[38]  Elisabeth Brambilla,et al.  DNA repair by ERCC1 in non-small-cell lung cancer and cisplatin-based adjuvant chemotherapy. , 2006, The New England journal of medicine.

[39]  R. Mirimanoff,et al.  MGMT gene silencing and benefit from temozolomide in glioblastoma. , 2005, The New England journal of medicine.

[40]  Jens C. Streibig,et al.  Bioassay analysis using R , 2005 .

[41]  P. Johnston,et al.  Molecular mechanisms of drug resistance , 2005, The Journal of pathology.

[42]  Jiri Bartek,et al.  Cell-cycle checkpoints and cancer , 2004, Nature.

[43]  A. Giaccia,et al.  Inhibition of ATR Leads to Increased Sensitivity to Hypoxia/Reoxygenation , 2004, Cancer Research.

[44]  A. D’Andrea,et al.  ATR couples FANCD2 monoubiquitination to the DNA-damage response. , 2004, Genes & development.

[45]  W. Travis Pathology of lung cancer. , 2002, Clinics in chest medicine.

[46]  S. Schreiber,et al.  ATR Is Not Required for p53 Activation but Synergizes with p53 in the Replication Checkpoint* , 2002, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[47]  S. Schreiber,et al.  ATR inhibition selectively sensitizes G1 checkpoint-deficient cells to lethal premature chromatin condensation , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[48]  E. Sausville,et al.  UCN-01: a potent abrogator of G2 checkpoint function in cancer cells with disrupted p53. , 1996, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[49]  I. Cree,et al.  Chemosensitivity testing of human tumors using a microplate adenosine triphosphate luminescence assay: clinical correlation for cisplatin resistance of ovarian carcinoma. , 1995, Cancer research.

[50]  Henderson Ic Window of opportunity. , 1991 .